Question answered a lot. 2nd gen rear links work for rear, 3rd gen front links work for rear, or remove sway bar. Both alternative links are an inch longer. This is about the most you can go without interfearing with rear lcas. I this this was all accurate bu someone confirm please.
I put 3rd gen front end links on my rear and have been very happy with them.
TNR - what difference did you notice with the longer links? My rear end seems a bit stiff and it could use a bit more articulation, but I don't want to loose the sway bar completely. Could longer links be the answer?
Longer links get the sway back to it's intended position. Running a link that is too short will limit the flex, and so will a link that is too long. If the links aren't the correct length they'll bind on the top side (short) and contact the lower arm (long). I make links on here and sell quite a few. IMO, there isn't really a need to have a sway bar on the front, but I'd keep it on the rear. The IFS on the front does a pretty good job of managing body roll, and the front coilovers you have will help more than stock. I'd keep the rears, since the majority of you'r body roll is going to come from the rear since coils are more forgiving than coilovers are.
TNR - what difference did you notice with the longer links? My rear end seems a bit stiff and it could use a bit more articulation, but I don't want to loose the sway bar completely. Could longer links be the answer?