V8 AWD 4EVR
New member
Hi all, been enjoying the 2010 4Runner news on this forum for last couple months.
In 2003 I bought a V8 4Runner, and waited to get one until the V8 with full-time 4wd and no black fender cladding was available. I would not have purchased a V6 model 4Runner.
I use my truck pretty hard, not rock crawling much, but back road travel, fishing, hunting, skiing, snowshoeing, hiking, exploring, etc. I am pretty active and doing something at least every other weekend. It has been the perfect vehicle for snow, road trips, off-road, and daily driving. It has great power to pull, pass, and cruise the interstates.
Like many of you, I am frustrated by Toyota taking what was to me a perfect vehicle and eliminating the v8 option and forcing poorly thought out options packages on us, instead of upgrading the great platform they had and changing the sheet metal. No more v8 (yes I know the 2010 has a more powerful v6 than my 2003 v8, but I wanted a more powerful 2010 v8, thanks - like 350 hp/375 torque). the loss of the AWD and locking center diff on Sport or SR5 models, and Then the further insult of 20 inch wheels on the Limited. KDSS forces a crappy navigation system which we all know is no where near as good as my iPhone's free navigation. Arrrggghhhh. It's not that hard to figure out.
I think one of two things happened.
1) Toyota decided that they were selling a Landcruiser for 35K, which was killing the LC market. I think there is a strong chance this is a serious factor, if you look at the 2003 v8 4Runner, it was basically a 2003 LC with different exterior and interior look. My understanding is it has same motor and AWD system as 2003 LC. An extra 35K for lots of headroom is not a good buy! I believe most LC's are just larger and with some extra electoronic do0-dads, but don't offer anything more (unlike say the Mercedes G-Wagon with AWD and 3 locking differentials!!)
and/or
2) Toyota does not really understand the 4Runner market. You do not buy a new vehicle for 35K and go rock crawling. Very few people will do that until the truck is 5 years old or more and they have a second vehicle. What people really do with 4Runners is tow smaller boats like 16 foot outboards, drift boats, rafts, motorcycles, etc. and do other active outdoor activities in mud and snow. The full-time v8 AWD is so superior to any other car or truck I have owned I don't see why I would want to go backwards.
I also get an average of 19 MPG, and around town it is closer to 17 and on a long highway drive it is about 21. That is pretty good mileage for a v8 SUV from 2003.
*** One last thing, the whole navigation system issue is pretty outrageous. They want $2,000 bucks for this system they are forcing on you, when we all know you would be way better off with an iPhone and 2 years of ATT service for about the same $2,000.00, plus you would get 75,000 apps and a cell phone for free. In dash navigation systems make no sense and I bet they just had a warehouse full of them then needed to dump so thats why you can't say no to navigation. Rant off.
In 2003 I bought a V8 4Runner, and waited to get one until the V8 with full-time 4wd and no black fender cladding was available. I would not have purchased a V6 model 4Runner.
I use my truck pretty hard, not rock crawling much, but back road travel, fishing, hunting, skiing, snowshoeing, hiking, exploring, etc. I am pretty active and doing something at least every other weekend. It has been the perfect vehicle for snow, road trips, off-road, and daily driving. It has great power to pull, pass, and cruise the interstates.
Like many of you, I am frustrated by Toyota taking what was to me a perfect vehicle and eliminating the v8 option and forcing poorly thought out options packages on us, instead of upgrading the great platform they had and changing the sheet metal. No more v8 (yes I know the 2010 has a more powerful v6 than my 2003 v8, but I wanted a more powerful 2010 v8, thanks - like 350 hp/375 torque). the loss of the AWD and locking center diff on Sport or SR5 models, and Then the further insult of 20 inch wheels on the Limited. KDSS forces a crappy navigation system which we all know is no where near as good as my iPhone's free navigation. Arrrggghhhh. It's not that hard to figure out.
I think one of two things happened.
1) Toyota decided that they were selling a Landcruiser for 35K, which was killing the LC market. I think there is a strong chance this is a serious factor, if you look at the 2003 v8 4Runner, it was basically a 2003 LC with different exterior and interior look. My understanding is it has same motor and AWD system as 2003 LC. An extra 35K for lots of headroom is not a good buy! I believe most LC's are just larger and with some extra electoronic do0-dads, but don't offer anything more (unlike say the Mercedes G-Wagon with AWD and 3 locking differentials!!)
and/or
2) Toyota does not really understand the 4Runner market. You do not buy a new vehicle for 35K and go rock crawling. Very few people will do that until the truck is 5 years old or more and they have a second vehicle. What people really do with 4Runners is tow smaller boats like 16 foot outboards, drift boats, rafts, motorcycles, etc. and do other active outdoor activities in mud and snow. The full-time v8 AWD is so superior to any other car or truck I have owned I don't see why I would want to go backwards.
I also get an average of 19 MPG, and around town it is closer to 17 and on a long highway drive it is about 21. That is pretty good mileage for a v8 SUV from 2003.
*** One last thing, the whole navigation system issue is pretty outrageous. They want $2,000 bucks for this system they are forcing on you, when we all know you would be way better off with an iPhone and 2 years of ATT service for about the same $2,000.00, plus you would get 75,000 apps and a cell phone for free. In dash navigation systems make no sense and I bet they just had a warehouse full of them then needed to dump so thats why you can't say no to navigation. Rant off.