Thanks, this made me consider those tires as well!OP, FWIW I bought my 'runner with brand new General Grabber AT2's on it and I really liked them. I drive mostly on road as well and do quite a bit of towing between March-November. Those tires left little to be desired- they look virtually identical to the BFG KO's you are considering except they're cheaper, they rode well and were quiet. Winter performance was excellent, they rocked in snow but ice was just OK (winter tires are always the best choice). Wet weather/hydroplaning was good as well. I got 20-22 highway and 17-18 DD to work everyday. They are also lightweight, which helps in a lot of ways. I put a solid 17K on them and they have at least that much to go. I replaced them because they were stock size and I put an OME lift on. If you are looking for a good performing tire that won't break the bank or make your truck look like a mall-cruiser, give them a look. If my situation didn't change, I was totally going to replace them with the same tire when they wore out. BTW I had the P-metric, not the LT tire.
I replaced them with Kelly Safari TSR's, LT load range C. Totally different tire!
Thanks! I was looking for an aggressive AT and I like the look of those toyos. I'll definitely have to look into themGot my Toyo Open Country AT II 265/70/17's on today. They ride just like the firestone destination le i had on, look badass, and got a great deal on them at discount tire. $671 otd.. original price they quoted me was 895. then i told them someone gots them for 759, they dropped it to 671..
OP i hope you get a great deal, *I cant speak for the rest of the tires but these at2's are nice, 60k warranty, mpg seems the same so far,and nice aggressive tire.. Good luck
I would not want to run the Hankook AT in wet road conditions. But with that being said tires are very personal preference.. I won't run khumo, hankook or falken tires again, just had to many failures over the past few years.
Yes four , I'm getting them tomorrow
....I too have a 2007 V-6 Sport, and the owner's manual clearly states that tire rotation is to be all five (5) tires every 5000 miles, the idea being that doing so will cause the set of five to last longer than just rotating four. Of course, the downside is that buying/mounting/balancing 5 tires will always be more expensive than doing so to four, but will occur rather less frequently if all five are rotated. So, what am I missing here? Why are so many guys only rotating the four on the ground when they bought their truck? How does one dare to ignore the instructions given by the owner's manual god? Fear thee not his wrath? Enquiring minds want to know.......