Jetboy
New member
There is a distinction between audio and video recordings. The wiretapping statutes deal with audio recording. If the OP is in a two-party state, then his recording is illegal and he could face prosecution as previously pointed out by others. If the owner of the dealership is friends with the District Attorney... the OP's life could become very difficult very quickly.
The OP was not part of the conversation. Therefore the one or two party consent rule has no bearing on the outcome.
Second he is at the same risk of bigfoot assaulting him. A prosecutor would never prosecute this regardless of his relationship with the dealer. No government agency in the history of the united states has done so. Or at least no one has been able to find even a single example of such a prosecution. That should give you some indication of the probability. It is close enough to zero to be about the same as the odds of bigfoot assaulting him today.