Stikk
New member
Hasselblad Xpan
It uses film...
Loved that camera when I had it.
Moved to Nikon D800 now.
Hasselblad Xpan
It uses film...
Loved that camera when I had it.
Moved to Nikon D800 now.
I don't know about you guys, but Sony's really kicking ass in the mid-high range for slr/dslr's.
nikon D700... first full frame DSLR... a buddy of mine was going completely into mirrorless and moving away from the DSLR.. so he sold it to me for a great price.. well used but loving the opportunity to learn photography with it...
just like 4Runner modifications and stuff, all the accessories for these great cameras can break the bank real fast.
nikon D700... first full frame DSLR... a buddy of mine was going completely into mirrorless and moving away from the DSLR.. so he sold it to me for a great price.. well used but loving the opportunity to learn photography with it...
just like 4Runner modifications and stuff, all the accessories for these great cameras can break the bank real fast.
You guys that jump out of perfectly functional planes for fun really are on a totally different level.
That said, not a bad skill to have.
Nikon D50. Been thinking of adding a D3400 for something cheap that should add a few features (such as video and much higher quality and range of settings, plus having only a 2GB card capacity is a royal pain), however good pics from a D50 are reaaaaaaaally good, having a hard time deciding if I want to replace it. Also have a Minolta XK kicking around, but dealing with film is a hassle. (Yeah yeah, lazy young person...whatever, probably true!)
I'm sure you're already used to it since you have a D50, but don't consider a 3000/5000 series body...
The on body AF motor opens up a huge range of older, cheap, and very good lenses. All of your AFS lenses will still work, but then you can use a 50mm 1.8 with AF and, new, they're under $150 - and one of the sharpest/lowest lenses you can reasonably buy. (I remember reading a scientific study Adorama had done to compare 1.4 to 1.8 50mm, both Nikon and Canon, and the photo quality on the 1.8s was actually "scientifically" better - the only thing the 1.4 had over the 1.8 was one stop lower).
Go to Adorama and buy a good condition used 7000 series (any of them will blow you away). What will really surprise you is the ISO capability.
I will say, however, that something around the time the D7000 came out the "look" of Nikon photos changed. That's, in part, why I keep my D300.
IMHO there's a huge difference in the color and saturation of Nikon vs Canon before that camera came out - Canon gets photos that are hyper-realistic, and Nikon has a bit of a "fantasy"/surreal look to them. When I first got the D7000 I was happy with it (I debated a D7000 vs D700 - and at the time a used D700 was still 2-3x the cost of a D7000 and the only thing the D700 had over the D7000 was full frame) but I noticed a somewhat "Canon" look to the photos.