Question...why is the Heisman presented before the bowl games?? Shouldn't it be given after the bowl games?? According to college standings/rankings, a bowl game is like a regular season game...that is, if you lost, then you have a -1 on your record. Thus, a bowl game should be no different than other games, right?? If so, then shouldn't the Heisman be presented after the bowl games??
Unfortunately, Troy Smith joins the ranks of many other Heisman winners with average talent (too small, relatively weak arm, frail looking...only good is running the ball), but blessed with a good team.
In the NFL, "Most Valuable Player" is presented after the season has ended but before the playoffs because MVP is an award for regular season play. And in the NFL, if you lose a playoff game, it does NOT change the regular season record. Thus, MVP makes sense.
I don't get the Heisman...it should be given to the nation's top player who has done the most for his/her team. Losing or choking the national championship game is NOT helping your team.