Clemsonfan15 said:
People say well McCain could die in office, sure that is true, but so could Obama. This is not a valid point.
You serious Clark?
Clemsonfan15 said:
People say well McCain could die in office, sure that is true, but so could Obama. This is not a valid point.
Originally posted by SonRunner
You bring up Ayers, Wright, Resko (sic), etc. and then ask for people to stop being partisan? Isn't that like the pot calling the kettle black?
Denio said:
To me it's when you have a person like Sarah Palin who has been brutally attacked for accepting the VP postion.. What was her crime?.
Denio said:Sonrunner...
I forgot to mention your Partisan Video that you posted...
Here is a Partisan Article that you might want to read...
The Republican National Committee has spent more than $150,000 to clothe and accessorize vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin and her family since her surprise pick by John McCain in late August. According to financial disclosure records, the accessorizing began in early September and included bills from Saks Fifth Avenue in St. Louis and New York for a combined $49,425.74. The records also document a couple of big-time shopping trips to Neiman Marcus in Minneapolis, including one $75,062.63 spree in early September. The RNC also spent $4,716.49 on hair and makeup through September after reporting no such costs in August. The cash expenditures immediately raised questions among campaign finance experts about their legality under the Federal Election Commission's long-standing advisory opinions on using campaign cash to purchase items for personal use.
TheBlueWave said:Ok, I'm officially out of this one, based on the post above. This was supposed to talk about issues, not campaign spending. Its not cheap to get in front of cameras, and this issue is of little to no importance.
Not like you guys will miss my commentary, but this is getting out of hand.:awais:
Let Thai vs. SonRunner commence!
SonRunner said:How about being woefully unqualified for the job of Presidency?
Joe the Plumber was a plant. It's already been established, check out wikipedia. That's a fact.
Thai said:BTW, so clothes are important but previous associations are not?
![]()
SonRunner said:It's not the clothes, it's spending 150k of contributors money on clothes for 3 months of campaigning. You can't see the forest for the trees.
Denio said:I have to put in my two cents about Wikipedia..
"Wikipedia is a flawed and irresponsible research tool," Seigenthaler wrote.
Thai said:How different is that from Obama spending millions/billions on TV ads?? Does Obama shop at Salvation Army??
Double standard BS.
Maybe you're too blind to see how ridiculous your post sounds...again, so clothes are important but previous associations are not?![]()
Which is more important for the Presidency??
Denio said:SonRunner..
How did they get Obama to go down the street where he lived.. Common Sense says that he was not a plant..
And if he was a plant SO WHAT! all he did was ask a question about taxes..
The whole problem is the loons on the left didn't like the answer that Obama gave.. So in the Clinton Playbook it's attack the person.. not the stupid answer that was given..
Thai said:Hmm, i hear crickets.....where in the world is SonRunner???
Since you like to be petty with your attacks, maybe you should read this article before anymore petty bashing on your part: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...obamas_allout_blitz_drowns_out_mccain_wi.html
"Obama can outspend McCain because, after promising to accept public campaign dollars and the spending limits that go with them, he instead opted to raise money privately.
...while McCain - who did accept public campaign dollars - is limited to the $47 million he had left as of Oct. 1."
:awais:
Thai said:How different is that from Obama spending millions/billions on TV ads?? Does Obama shop at Salvation Army??
Double standard BS.
Maybe you're too blind to see how ridiculous your post sounds...again, so clothes are important but previous associations are not?![]()
Which is more important for the Presidency??