Major SNAFU
New member
The title says it all.
I bought it with 5K on it from a dealership. Bought the extended 6-year, 100K warranty but the converters are NOT covered because it is only the "Gold" plan.
(From now on when I buy warranties I am only going to demand a list of what isn't covered I don't care what is.)
This is a really frustrating problem. I traded away my Tahoe for the 4Runner because of pressure to get something more economical. I will not buy/drive anything that isn't built on a truck-chassis.
Over time, I came to like the 4RUnner 90% of the time. The anti-slip logic frustrated me often in deep snow when sometimes you just have to go all out, but no biggie. Only on major family trips was the vehicle too small. We wound up having to take both the 4-Runner and the Rav on every major trip because of this (so much for improved gas mileage).
But I came to like the vehicle over all and had settled my mind to drive it into the ground. But now this has happened and I need some serious advice.
There are 4 converters on this thing and 2 have gone bad. Dealer wants $2K to replace them, another shop will do it for about $1500K. Too much money for a 6-year old vehicle with 2 more converters that I have to assume are on the brink as well.
Because it shows up as a engine fault, it also disables all of the traction control. Thank goodness is isn't winter right now or I would be really screwed.
So, what to do? Based on friends who have 4Runners, I was expecting an easy 150000 miles before any major problems. If I have these problems at 84000, I am reluctant to pour money into a potential money-pit.
I am also disinclined to get another one. Every GMC truck I have owned hit the 150000k mark with ease without any major fault.
Also, one other observation is that I would like to make, since I track the mileage of all our vehicles constantly is this. Yes, the 4-Runner got as high as 26 mpg on the highway - with only me and no load on it. Put the canoe and other things on top of it and the best you could do was 21 mpg. Ad the headwinds going west across Ohio and I have recorded as low as 14 mpg with only 4 people and luggage and a bag on top.
The point is that my Tahoe, with the 350 V8 got 20-21 mpg on the highway, all of the time. Canoe, load whatever. Unless I hooked on a 2000 lbs or more trailer, the thing was a rock.
So is the 4_runner or something like it really more economical over the long run?
I am not trying to troll, I need advice and data from more knowledgeable 4_Runner users that am I.
Thanks in advance.
I bought it with 5K on it from a dealership. Bought the extended 6-year, 100K warranty but the converters are NOT covered because it is only the "Gold" plan.
(From now on when I buy warranties I am only going to demand a list of what isn't covered I don't care what is.)
This is a really frustrating problem. I traded away my Tahoe for the 4Runner because of pressure to get something more economical. I will not buy/drive anything that isn't built on a truck-chassis.
Over time, I came to like the 4RUnner 90% of the time. The anti-slip logic frustrated me often in deep snow when sometimes you just have to go all out, but no biggie. Only on major family trips was the vehicle too small. We wound up having to take both the 4-Runner and the Rav on every major trip because of this (so much for improved gas mileage).
But I came to like the vehicle over all and had settled my mind to drive it into the ground. But now this has happened and I need some serious advice.
There are 4 converters on this thing and 2 have gone bad. Dealer wants $2K to replace them, another shop will do it for about $1500K. Too much money for a 6-year old vehicle with 2 more converters that I have to assume are on the brink as well.
Because it shows up as a engine fault, it also disables all of the traction control. Thank goodness is isn't winter right now or I would be really screwed.
So, what to do? Based on friends who have 4Runners, I was expecting an easy 150000 miles before any major problems. If I have these problems at 84000, I am reluctant to pour money into a potential money-pit.
I am also disinclined to get another one. Every GMC truck I have owned hit the 150000k mark with ease without any major fault.
Also, one other observation is that I would like to make, since I track the mileage of all our vehicles constantly is this. Yes, the 4-Runner got as high as 26 mpg on the highway - with only me and no load on it. Put the canoe and other things on top of it and the best you could do was 21 mpg. Ad the headwinds going west across Ohio and I have recorded as low as 14 mpg with only 4 people and luggage and a bag on top.
The point is that my Tahoe, with the 350 V8 got 20-21 mpg on the highway, all of the time. Canoe, load whatever. Unless I hooked on a 2000 lbs or more trailer, the thing was a rock.
So is the 4_runner or something like it really more economical over the long run?
I am not trying to troll, I need advice and data from more knowledgeable 4_Runner users that am I.
Thanks in advance.