2010 Toyota 4Runner Trail Edition: Review and Pics (TruckTrend)

Looks like www.toyota.com finally has all the 2010 4Runner info/pricing available.

Time to build my own...

:tongue:

When I looked at it this morning, it did not have the Trail Version as a selection choice. Comparing an SR5 w/convenience package only--without the TE specifics, the sticker was just about the same as on my 09 loaded TE.
Bill W
 
Looks like www.toyota.com finally has all the 2010 4Runner info/pricing available.

Time to build my own...

:tongue:

wow, look how mean the Trail Edition looks in black, as compared to the SR5. For fun, I'll add the blue limited for contrast.
 

Attachments

  • trail.jpg
    trail.jpg
    28 KB · Views: 31,118
  • sr5.jpg
    sr5.jpg
    27.9 KB · Views: 3,942
  • limited.jpg
    limited.jpg
    28.3 KB · Views: 4,616
Overall, I like the aggressive look of the trail, the black separation on the headlights is pretty cool. The sr5 and the limited are too, blah.

Still, I agree it looks like a sequoia and fj cruiser mix, but its not that bad. If you think about all the yota styling of today, it matches. This is just the look that they are going for right now, and in that context, its not bad. I also hate the scoop. It reflects the sun straight into my eyes and I just hate the stupid scoops. It's not like they serve a purpose anyway. Overall, I still think that 2nd and 3rd gen are the best in terms of looks. I'm really diggin the V6 and expect they will add the v8 option in a year or so. Toyota has always been slow and cautious with their engines. The tundra was the biggest leap they ever made and now they just want to take it slow again.

Besides, even though you can technically get a 4 cyl, its not like any dealers are going to have any on the lot.

those lights are asking for trouble. its like they want them to be smashed. Oh well, just another excuse to get a new bumper!

I don't like the interior either. It does look cheap and plasticy. 3rd gen is my personal fav - it would have been nice if it could have been a mix of the 3rd gen and the fj 80. ironic how the best looking ones are all in about the same time period...

Maybe if I had enough money, I'd trade my 91 for this new guy, but only if I could get rid of that scoop and get a v8.
 
Last edited:
That's exactly what reviews said about the RAV4, why bother with the 4-banger. It's also one the reasons why the RAV4 gotten high praises in reviews in the cute-ute segment, because Toyota offers a V6 when others are just 4-cyl.

Actually, there are reviews stating just the opposite about the new I4 for the 2009 and 2010 RAV. One is entitled "No V6 needed here..."
Yet I believe that the new I4 in the RAV is more powerful than the one for the new 4Runner!
 
Well, now that I've had a few days to really look over all the information & pics on the 5th gen, I think I'll have to eventually say goodbye to Toyota and join the Jeep camp. I love my 4th gen and have no plans to sell it, but when the time comes to buy another SUV, Toyota will not be a consideration.

I think it's time to start following the Jeep forums to learn more about the 2011 Grand Cherokee.
 
Damnit!! they shoulda put a Solid Front Axle!! haha that would be sick! :) and toytec is right i dont think i will buy a 4runner in the future:( but jeep!! Absolutely Not! but a slim chance of the 09 wrangler but next purchase will most likely be an FJ or a Tacoma.
 
If the base price of the Trail Edition listed on this thread is accurate, then I believe Toyota has priced it to fail.
 
IMHO i dont think the grand cherokee looks all that great. but the wranglers have a timeless look, and i have always wanted to buy an old cherokee to turn into a rock crawler:) with an exo roll cage custom built. that would be sick!
 
If the base price of the Trail Edition listed on this thread is accurate, then I believe Toyota has priced it to fail.
i agree. pretty spendy for a vehicle that, while adding some standard niceties (i.e., rear e-locker), conspicuously removes other highly indispensable features (torsen center diff). :lightsaber:
 
Do they offer a v8 option in the 2010 4runner or do they plan to?

Nope... I e-mailed their Communications Director and their stance is that the new V6 is equal or better than the 4.x V8, so there is no need for a V8.

Of course that is probably the party line and doesn't mean much.
 
Damnit!! they shoulda put a Solid Front Axle!! haha that would be sick!
Solid front axle? Then their sales of 2-3000 4Runners per month would drop to 500 per month.

Solid front axles have their benefits offroad, but have severe penalties on the road, which is where 99.99% of 4Runner spend their time.
 
Solid front axle? Then their sales of 2-3000 4Runners per month would drop to 500 per month.

Solid front axles have their benefits offroad, but have severe penalties on the road, which is where 99.99% of 4Runner spend their time.

dude trail edition only and make it an option so u can have it if u really want it
 
dude trail edition only and make it an option so u can have it if u really want it

The people who are that serious about off road driving to put up with a solid front axle want something with better angles. Something like a Wrangler Rubicon, not something as big as a 4Runner.
 
The people who are that serious about off road driving to put up with a solid front axle want something with better angles. Something like a Wrangler Rubicon, not something as big as a 4Runner.

Ehhh idk about that. Land cruisers (80 series)are one of the best off-roaders there are.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
278,315
Messages
3,554,130
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top