2017 Wish List

You guys kill me.

Almost everything on the different lists can be had by buying a Land Cruiser or a Lexus 460. What? Oh you don't want to spend anymore money than what a 4Runner, in it's current configuration, costs? So you guys want a V8 with all the bells and whistles and Toyota reliability and durability with no more additional cost? Wait, if you want all that stuff like Ford, Jeep and GM offer you just need to go buy those vehicles.
You can get:
Reliability and durability for $$$
or
Bling, bells and whistles for $$$
or
Reliability, durability, Bling, bells and whistles for $$$$$$$

Land Cruiser FTW.

If I could bring myself to drive something that costs $80K I would buy a new Land Cruiser. It is the ultimate SUV. Rode in a new one last week and they are really really nice with exceptional capability.


I never said I had any issue paying more money. I absolutely would. My max is $50k so my $40k Limited came in well under budget. Just a wish list. We can all dream can't we??
 
Sure, I "like" the 460, but I don't get back in personal value what the extra money costs me. Besides all 3 times I've gone to look at one, I'm totally put off by their stupid barn door.

I feel your pain, I have never seriously considered making a move on a GX... but have occasionally day-dreamed about the Luxury features plus V8 and keep coming back to the rear hatch. I was able to overcome styling issues, bu the the "barn-door" and no roll down back window were too much.
 
I've been putting off replacing my '03 SE. Every time I go to Yota show room I'm put off that what's there is 4 years behind other vehicles. While I appreciate the mechanical dependability - On 4th Gen, a cracking dash, rusting calipers, flaking clear coat, crappy MPG, rusting rock shields (not from rocks but from inside out) have kept me from paying a premium for a new Toyota (including the 4RNR).
 
The small new Lexus NX SUV has a new turbo 4 cylinder that is out now. First turbo from Lexus.

Maybe we will see Toyota producing more Turbos in the future. I'm pretty sure they will be more turbo offerings from Toyota.

Toyota needs to make a 3.0L V6 turbo for the next 4runner. :)
 
Last edited:
Conservative: 4.6 V8 w/ 6-Speed Auto and better gas mileage than current.

Dreaming: Powertrain similar to new Ford 2.7 Ecoboost V6 325hp/375tq w/ 6-speed Auto, better gas mileage and power than current.


I had one of them for a bit.. well, it was the 1.6L ecoboost... Lots of them are developing issue with carbon buildup on the valves, resulting in Ford replacing the heads.. Ever since hearing that, Ford Turbo'd motors scare me lol. Maybe Toyota could do better... I personally wouldn't want to see it though. More issues down the road.
 
I had one of them for a bit.. well, it was the 1.6L ecoboost... Lots of them are developing issue with carbon buildup on the valves, resulting in Ford replacing the heads.. Ever since hearing that, Ford Turbo'd motors scare me lol. Maybe Toyota could do better... I personally wouldn't want to see it though. More issues down the road.

The carbon buildup issue isn't limited to FI engines, it appears to be an issue related to DI engines.

I have full confidence and faith that Toyota can do turbocharging while keeping reliability and durability. They are the company that brought us the MK4 Supra...
 
The carbon buildup issue isn't limited to FI engines, it appears to be an issue related to DI engines.

I have full confidence and faith that Toyota can do turbocharging while keeping reliability and durability. They are the company that brought us the MK4 Supra...

Toyota, Honda and Subaru can all add turbos and superchargers and still maintain a certain reliability and durability. The problem is cost, as it is in any endeavor. Let's say you could add a turbo for $2K and get a 10% power increase. Now let's say you can add that turbo to get the 10% power increase but to get the same reliability and durability as you had with the stock power plant its gonna cost you (better design, parts) $3K. That's the way Toyota and Honda do it. Ford, GM and Chrysler? um no. It's all about the price point fellas.
 
Toyota, Honda and Subaru can all add turbos and superchargers and still maintain a certain reliability and durability. The problem is cost, as it is in any endeavor. Let's say you could add a turbo for $2K and get a 10% power increase. Now let's say you can add that turbo to get the 10% power increase but to get the same reliability and durability as you had with the stock power plant its gonna cost you (better design, parts) $3K. That's the way Toyota and Honda do it. Ford, GM and Chrysler? um no. It's all about the price point fellas.

I think you have it right.

Toyota won't do it until they can do it right and within the pricepoint they need. Ford will get it pretty close, and then use customers as field testers and just warranty and make changes once it's on the market.

I'd also assume there are several platforms that a smaller turbo V6 could be used in to spread costs. Though I don't expect a change like this sooner than 7th Gen.
 
You guys kill me.

Almost everything on the different lists can be had by buying a Land Cruiser or a Lexus 460. What? Oh you don't want to spend anymore money than what a 4Runner, in it's current configuration, costs? So you guys want a V8 with all the bells and whistles and Toyota reliability and durability with no more additional cost? Wait, if you want all that stuff like Ford, Jeep and GM offer you just need to go buy those vehicles.
You can get:
Reliability and durability for $$$
or
Bling, bells and whistles for $$$
or
Reliability, durability, Bling, bells and whistles for $$$$$$$

Land Cruiser FTW.

If I could bring myself to drive something that costs $80K I would buy a new Land Cruiser. It is the ultimate SUV. Rode in a new one last week and they are really really nice with exceptional capability.


So I have to spend $80,000 to get a console with a small compartment on top (like I had on my '04 Tundra) or a coin holder that holds more than 8 quarters (quarters only)?
 
The V8 with Toyota reliability and durability was already done in the 4th gen. I imagine getting rid of the FJ and GX, are part of a reallignment to rope in vehicles that were overlapping too much. For example the 4Runner outsold both the FJ and GX combined in 2013 and pretty handily too, at 51,625 4Runners to 25,267 FJ/GX. So I don't think it's unrealistic to assume the V8 w/ 6-speed could easily come back to the 4Runner.

While you are right the LC hits all the marks for the most part, I don't think people cross-shop an SUV that's over twice as expensive as the average Limited T4R. If Toyota axed the Seqouia, and lowered the price of the LC then that might change. I don't see that happening though.

I included the 2.7 Ecoboost style option because Toyota has indicated in the past that turbocharging is epxected to be brought back to meet power/mpg goals. Looking at vehicles like the Supra, Toyota obviously has experience in this area. Ford may be having some issues with the Ecoboost, but they are selling like hotcakes and offer an exciting combo of power and fuel efficiency. I assume Toyota could do it better...

yeah the GX460 and LC, they sell 1/2 the amount of the 4runners, but the $$$ made per unit sold is gonna be higher than the 4runner by a big margin.

and for all those that want a v8, you folks need to realize its not gonna happen. hence they removed the v8 and gave it to the lexus models. why have a 4runner with a v8 killing your v8 lexus sales.

and the numbers show a jump in sales in the v8 lexus once they dropped the v8 in the 4runner. the sales jumped from 6k to 16k in 1 year and leveled off around 11-12k a year after that.

the price differential was like 16k in 2004 between the v8 4runner and the GX470.

and we don't even know how the café rules will affect the 4runner with a v8 on Toyota compared to the lexus selling ~12k vs 50k+.
 
Toyota, Honda and Subaru can all add turbos and superchargers and still maintain a certain reliability and durability. .

most turbo-charged subaru variants of their 2.5 boxter engines are notoriously UNreliable. you wouldn't think so, but it's the truth, i can tell you first-hand.
 
yeah the GX460 and LC, they sell 1/2 the amount of the 4runners, but the $$$ made per unit sold is gonna be higher than the 4runner by a big margin.

and for all those that want a v8, you folks need to realize its not gonna happen. hence they removed the v8 and gave it to the lexus models. why have a 4runner with a v8 killing your v8 lexus sales.

and the numbers show a jump in sales in the v8 lexus once they dropped the v8 in the 4runner. the sales jumped from 6k to 16k in 1 year and leveled off around 11-12k a year after that.

the price differential was like 16k in 2004 between the v8 4runner and the GX470.

and we don't even know how the café rules will affect the 4runner with a v8 on Toyota compared to the lexus selling ~12k vs 50k+.

The GX has been cancelled... Leaving a window open for the 4Runner to get the V8 back as an option.

most turbo-charged subaru variants of their 2.5 boxter engines are notoriously UNreliable. you wouldn't think so, but it's the truth, i can tell you first-hand.

I would argue that most 2.5 turbo Subaru's kept stock are reliable. While some have failed stock, most have ring land issues with tune. There is speculation that it has to do with injector pulse causing a lean condition. It doesn't show up in the afr across the board but the 2k-3k rpm stumble is at least one piston going very lean.
 
The GX has been cancelled... Leaving a window open for the 4Runner to get the V8 back as an option.


still wont happen. just means it will go in the replacement if they do replace the GX stateside.

GX will still be around due to the rest of the world using the Prado.
 
Oh and a power lift gate. That'd be nice. I've been spoiled by all other SUVs that have it.

I wonder how hard it would be to integrate the power lift gate system from the highlander. the power struts probably wouldn't fit in the body pocket for the struts.
 
Toyota won't do it until they can do it right and within the pricepoint they need. Ford will get it pretty close, and then use customers as field testers and just warranty and make changes once it's on the market.

I'd also assume there are several platforms that a smaller turbo V6 could be used in to spread costs. Though I don't expect a change like this sooner than 7th Gen.

Toyota uses a combination of port and direct injection to help combat the carbon build up.

Ford has a pretty solid history of reliable supercharging ('03-04 Cobras, Lightnings) and the new turbo engines aren't all that bad (Carbon deposits notwithstanding). So it can be done.

Oh and a power lift gate. That'd be nice. I've been spoiled by all other SUVs that have it.

I could see wanting it once you have had it, but I personally don't want a power lift gate. I have been cross shopping the new Outbacks as well and am not enthralled with being forced into it.

As for what I'd like to see, after test driving a Limited the other day....

I'd like to see a removable front air dam to get that extra 1-2 mpg on the highway and maybe the 3.5L from the Highlander for $1000 less.
 
Toyota uses a combination of port and direct injection to help combat the carbon build up.

Ford has a pretty solid history of reliable supercharging ('03-04 Cobras, Lightnings) and the new turbo engines aren't all that bad (Carbon deposits notwithstanding). So it can be done.



I could see wanting it once you have had it, but I personally don't want a power lift gate. I have been cross shopping the new Outbacks as well and am not enthralled with being forced into it.

As for what I'd like to see, after test driving a Limited the other day....

I'd like to see a removable front air dam to get that extra 1-2 mpg on the highway and maybe the 3.5L from the Highlander for $1000 less.

Front air dam HELPS, not hurts, efficiency. If you took that off the FT 4WD, combined with the bit of extra pounds the LE has, would drop the LE below the SR5 and the TE models that are configured the same.
 
Front air dam HELPS, not hurts, efficiency. If you took that off the FT 4WD, combined with the bit of extra pounds the LE has, would drop the LE below the SR5 and the TE models that are configured the same.

I think that was what he meant. Removable so you can put it on to pick up MPG on the highway, and take it off when you want the extra clearance offroad.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
278,309
Messages
3,554,068
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top