2018 ORP - Really not much ground clearance?

Fox also makes a lower cost circlip 2.0 shock that's about $500 for the pair. My guess is that they're relatively plush and progressive valved. But I don't know anyone who's used them.

Are you talking about the normal Fox 2.0 coilover or is there something else I'm missing? Those for the pair are closer to $900 and probably what I'd go with if I ever upgrade. Aluminum body for heat dissipation and corrosion resistance is important to me here in NJ, but still starting to get up there in price.

Fox 2.0 Performance Series Coilovers Front Pair for 2010-2022 Toyota 4 – Shock Surplus
 
Are you talking about the normal Fox 2.0 coilover or is there something else I'm missing? Those for the pair are closer to $900 and probably what I'd go with if I ever upgrade. Aluminum body for heat dissipation and corrosion resistance is important to me here in NJ, but still starting to get up there in price.

Fox 2.0 Performance Series Coilovers Front Pair for 2010-2022 Toyota 4 – Shock Surplus

naw, its a similar setup to the bilstein 5100, you reuse the OEM spring and mounting hardware. my guess is they ride like the 2.0's for the rear. "sportier" ie not mushy... PERFORMANCE SERIES 2.0 SNAP RING COIL-OVER IFP SHOCK (SPRING NOT INCL) | Truck Shocks | FOX
 
Maybe it’s me, because I’m old. I just don’t see the need for speed when crawling along a difficult trail. I’m of the old school. Low range and locked in 1st going through a technical section. And years of off road driving has taught me tire placement by feel. I seldom have used a spotter, they distract me.

I’ve never had a lifted vehicle. I’d have everything from a 1970 Ford F-250 4x4, to my current ‘18 SR5. All stock suspension, all stock size tires.

My priority is overall value. I know my 4Runner isn’t made to do Moab trails at speed. I have no desire for a rig that can do that. So there is no need for me to turn my stock rig into a Frankenstein, along with the price tag up front and the price tag in the future in high failure rate of parts and diminished overall drivability day to day. I’m sure there’s someone with talent that could turn a Lincoln Town Car limo into a Moab rock crawler, but what’s the point? My 4Runner can do the trails I want to take, yet it can run down the highway comfortably, quietly and smoothly when the wife and I with another couple go to a city two hours away for some fine dining. And I’ve used it as a tractor in developing my acreage by dragging out sagebrush and driveways. I tow a utility trailer and haul a ton of heating pellets once or twice annually. It is stable in the deep ice and snow on the unplowed country dirt roads where I live. And the list goes on. It’s versitle.

I’ve had acquaintance with others who spent $$$$ above the $$$$$ sticker of their rigs in lifts and all sorts of off road bling. All of them spent $$$$ in repairs before their rigs turned over 75,000 to 90,000 miles. One even finally gave up after his second engine and second transmission in his 2011 Rubicon with only 90,000 miles. All were surprised and jealous that I spent $0 in repairs to my bone stock 2002 Tacoma TRD, even though it now has over 200,000 miles (I gave it to my 44 year old son when I bought the 4Runner). We all took the same routes through some difficult eastern California, Nevada and Death Valley trails over the decades. That truck was like a Timex watch - it took a licking but keeps on ticking. It’s even been on its side (a badly eroded shelf road caved in underneath me).

Some may think my 4Runner is just a pavement troller, until they notice the deep pinstriping, then notice the skid plates. But my experience of where to put my tires has kept the rest of the undersides unmolested. I know my 4Runner has limits, but I accept that and have a lot of fun within those limits. And I don’t have to spend an additional dime.
Great post, great perspective to just do a lot of driving in places you want to go, then decide.. I bought my first 4x4 in college, a 1977 F-150. It was totally stock except tires. Learned that "yes, Virginia, 4 wheel drive is not a get out of being stuck in the mud free" card, as did my buddy in his '72 Landcruiser. I learned a lot about tire placement and what my truck could and couldn't do, and what I would have to do do to my truck if I wanted to keep from high centering on rutty trails or big rocks/moguls. I decided to keep it stock (with 33' tires) and enjoy. Almost everything is a tradeoff in some degree or another.
 
Last edited:
naw, its a similar setup to the bilstein 5100, you reuse the OEM spring and mounting hardware. my guess is they ride like the 2.0's for the rear. "sportier" ie not mushy... PERFORMANCE SERIES 2.0 SNAP RING COIL-OVER IFP SHOCK (SPRING NOT INCL) | Truck Shocks | FOX

Thank you! I didn't realize they made a non-spring version 2.0 like that. Makes it certainly more attainable for the same shock just without the threaded body and Fox spring. I'd be curious to know how much of a difference a fox spring would make over the OE front spring. For on road, the OE spring may be the ticket as I'm sure it's a lower spring rate than the Fox. Both are up to 2" too.
 
Thank you! I didn't realize they made a non-spring version 2.0 like that. Makes it certainly more attainable for the same shock just without the threaded body and Fox spring. I'd be curious to know how much of a difference a fox spring would make over the OE front spring. For on road, the OE spring may be the ticket as I'm sure it's a lower spring rate than the Fox. Both are up to 2" too.

I'd love to hear from anyone who has them. It seems like its super rare for anyone to buy this set at $1k for the pair of coilovers when a similar non-reservoir 2.5 is just a little more $. And you can usually find fox trd pro takeoffs for $700ish for a set. IMO that's a much better value than $1k for the 2.0 complete coilovers. At $450 or so for the pair it starts to look like a better value.

They might be great, but they also might be really crappy. It seems like no one ever knows. I've never seen a review from anyone who's had them. Maybe fox would tell you what the valving is compared to the 2.5s?

I had Fox performance 2.0 rear shocks on my 4Runner for a while. I did not love them when empty. They were valved too firmly for no load. With 400-600lbs of load they did great. What was a bit odd for me was that they were firmer than the front Fox 2.5s in front. But that's not necessarily any indication of how the fronts will feel. I would think Fox would shoot for the same valve resistance as the 2.5's.

The springs shouldn't make much difference. OEM front springs IIRC are 580lb/in. The Fox 2.5's are I think 600lb/in. King uses 550lb/in springs. And I think the TRD Pro are even a little softer. So the OEM springs are right in the middle of the common range of spring rate. The coils are linear springs on all of them. There's no difference in function between a spring from any manufacture. A bad spring will lose its height or other issues over time. But in general - two springs with the same rate will perform identically. So a 580lb OEM spring will be practically identical to a 600lb spring that comes with the Fox shocks.

I bought my Fox 2.5s in the before time. (If you're new to this - all of this stuff used to be a lot cheaper a few years ago.) In today's pricing world I think the 2.0's are a pretty good value at first look.
 
When my 2016 with KDSS was stock I found it very difficult to not hit the undercarriage over very simple trails. A small lift with stock tire size made all the difference. Strangely, looking at the front drive line it is perfectly straight after the lift. This tells me it was intended to be higher from the factory by design but for other reasons it was lowered by about 1.5 inches.

I agree with this 100%. I have off roaded in the Arizona desert for over 20 years. A small lift with some good all terrain tires for puncture resistance makes a day and night difference to keep from dragging the bottom of the 4runner. Approach, departure and breakover angles are all improved. The advertised ground clearance is not correct. The front sets lower than they say. Once you add passengers, cargo etc. the front is lower yet.When you hit a bump in the front the front clearance is even lower when the suspension drops. Measure your front clearance from the skid plate to the ground on a level surface and you will see what I mean.
 
Last edited:
I'd love to hear from anyone who has them. It seems like its super rare for anyone to buy this set at $1k for the pair of coilovers when a similar non-reservoir 2.5 is just a little more $. And you can usually find fox trd pro takeoffs for $700ish for a set. IMO that's a much better value than $1k for the 2.0 complete coilovers. At $450 or so for the pair it starts to look like a better value.

They might be great, but they also might be really crappy. It seems like no one ever knows. I've never seen a review from anyone who's had them. Maybe fox would tell you what the valving is compared to the 2.5s?

I had Fox performance 2.0 rear shocks on my 4Runner for a while. I did not love them when empty. They were valved too firmly for no load. With 400-600lbs of load they did great. What was a bit odd for me was that they were firmer than the front Fox 2.5s in front. But that's not necessarily any indication of how the fronts will feel. I would think Fox would shoot for the same valve resistance as the 2.5's.

The springs shouldn't make much difference. OEM front springs IIRC are 580lb/in. The Fox 2.5's are I think 600lb/in. King uses 550lb/in springs. And I think the TRD Pro are even a little softer. So the OEM springs are right in the middle of the common range of spring rate. The coils are linear springs on all of them. There's no difference in function between a spring from any manufacture. A bad spring will lose its height or other issues over time. But in general - two springs with the same rate will perform identically. So a 580lb OEM spring will be practically identical to a 600lb spring that comes with the Fox shocks.

I bought my Fox 2.5s in the before time. (If you're new to this - all of this stuff used to be a lot cheaper a few years ago.) In today's pricing world I think the 2.0's are a pretty good value at first look.

I'd like to hear reviews as well as I don't see many. Watched some videos on Shock Surplus and seems Fox is definitely better off road over the Bilstein 5100, but is definitely firmer. However, it is a better shock with aluminum bodies, it's rebuildable, takes hard hits better, etc. The price point at $875 is still $500 less than the Fox 2.5 which is overkill for my purposes. But, the TRD Pro Fox is a 2.5" shock too and can find at a much cheaper price than both. Just need to get lift somehow for them.

The snap ring shocks would be $500, but then you'd have to pay for the struts to be built which shops would charge probably 1-2 hours of labor for which makes the gap even closer to the full 2.0 Coilover.

It's easy to see why Fox probably doesn't have many reviews. Bilstein sets are considerably cheaper and is still a high quality shock that is pretty good with whatever you put in front of it.
 
A bit OT. But driving into a snow covered gas station they have this odd island curb jutting out and I drove over it without realizing I drove over a 5" curb. lol
 

Forum statistics

Threads
278,312
Messages
3,554,089
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top