Amsoil for my 4Runner V8

Royal Purple

I just changed to Royal Purple 5/30 oil at 8K. Anyone have imput on this oil? I was told that small dyno proven Hp gains were made using RP oil throughout.

I did this switch mainly believing that start up wear would be reduced due to the cold weather effect on dino. I wonder if Royal Purple is overkill and a semi- syn oil would provide the same effect. I heard that most wear is caused from cold startups.
 
Koz said:
This test data is the most current data available. It was done by Amsoil, but don't think that they can just make themselves look good. All other manufactures can do the same testing and publish there findings. Also you will see that other oils are just as good (almost).

http://www.amsoil.com/performancetests/g1971/index.aspx

Koz

Koz, I'm sure amsoil is good oil but so is Mobil 1 and it's easy to get, cheaper to get at Costco and it has the API seal of approval that meets warranty requirements. Comparing these two oils is kind of like getting shot in the head with a 357 Mag. or a 44 Mag. your dead either way. Amsoil for most people is a hassle to get and costs more, plus it won't make your engine last longer or run better than Mobil 1 and it does not meet warranty requirements of Toyota. Where is the payoff for anyone to use Amsoil versus Mobil 1??
 
At about the 2,000 mile mark, I took my 4Runner to the dealer in NJ and they used Castrol dyno oil.

At about the 4,000 mile mark, I bought an OEM factory oil filter and purchased the new Mobil 1 5w30 new extended 15,000 mile oil from Walmart in Virginia. I don't think that I have noticed much of a difference performance wise, but it does seem that with the new Mobil 1 it gets a bit better gas mileage as per the computer.

I now have about 9,000 miles on the truck, and I will change it again at 10,000 miles. I will probably use full synthetic lubricants on the differential and other non-engine parts (and probably AMSOIL). However, I don't think that I am going to use AMSOIL for the engine because I will probably change the oil every 5,000 miles anyway. Even with the new Mobil-1 15k oil, I would probably change the oil every 7,500 at the most.

I am going to check my oil tomorrow and see what it looks like after 5,000 miles of mostly highway use.
 
SWUtah said:
Koz, I'm sure amsoil is good oil but so is Mobil 1 and it's easy to get, cheaper to get at Costco and it has the API seal of approval that meets warranty requirements.

Toyota requires an API SJ certification. First post in this thread .

All Amsoil oil is certified API SJ and meets warranty requirements.
 
Bluto said:
Toyota requires an API SJ certification. First post in this thread .

All Amsoil oil is certified API SJ and meets warranty requirements.

Bluto, I think you are wrong about the term "CERTIFIED" and how it applys to this discussion.

I know that some of their dino oil does display the API donut which means they meet the requirements of Toyota as stated in your owners manual. If you look at the bottle of their synthetic automobile motor oil it has never displayed the API donut and if used and you have a lubrication problem, toyota will void your warranty when they look at your documentation of oil changes. Amsoil plays fast and loose with the term "certified" the only certification that is important to Toyota is the API certification that lets Amsoil display the donut on the bottle. If this has changed let me know which synthetics now display the API donut. Amsoil does not disclose anywhere on their web site that they have the API donut for their synthetic automobile motor oil and if they did they would be touting it all over their site since this has been a problem for them for years. The reason is that they want a competitive edge from a cost standpoint and don't want to pay the money to have the synthetic API approved, since everytime a oil maker changes any ingredent they have to pay again to have the oil retested.
 
Last edited:
I was incorrect. Not all Amsoil is 'API Certified.' The XL line is API certified.

I read the owners manual. Where does it explicitly require API certified oil? The manual has the viscosity and grade to use. It shows the API symbol to assist when choosing oil (but does not require it).

Does Toyota require an oil meeting the API grade requirements (which Amsoil does), or API Certified? I'll e-mail Toyota for clarification. I find the manual misleading on such a simple topic.


You are incorrect stating Amsoil avoids API certification due to the cost. The extended drain oils aren't API certified because of the phosphorous content. "AMSOIL motor oils, except for the API licensed XL-7500 5W-30, 5W-20 and 10W-30 viscosity grades, all have greater than .10% phosphorous levels, and therefore, cannot be API licensed." Read below if you want to know why.


Our TSO 0W30 is not API certified.



AMSOIL API Licensing

Q. Why aren't all AMSOIL motor oils API licensed?

A. Good question. AMSOIL staffers have recently read some message boards with misinformation regarding this issue. Let us address API licensing in depth, as well as the issue of warranties. Some AMSOIL motor oils are API licensed, some are not. If you're concerned about your warranty and feel pressures to use an API licensed oil, even after reading this answer, then the 5W-30 (XLF), 5W-20 (XLM) or 10W-30 (XLT) XL-7500 or our 15W-40 (PCO) API licensed oils should be your choice. If you are looking for an alternative to frequent oil changes or just want the best performing oil for your car, then one of our top tier non-API licensed synthetic oils are for you. Read on, and decide for yourself.

API Licensing - Passenger Cars - What is it?

An API (American Petroleum Institute) license indicates that a specific motor oil formulation has passed the minimum performance standards as defined by a series of laboratory bench, physical, chemical and engine tests. These tests were selected and minimum performance standards were set by the API Lubricants Committee to address specific areas such as engine wear, deposits, fuel economy, emissions, etc. The committee is comprised of representatives from automobile, oil and additive companies. The current specification is SJ/GF-2, and in July 2001 the first use of SL/GF-3 will begin.

Costs

The cost for running a test program for a single passenger car motor oil formulation is from $125,000 to $300,000, depending on if the formula passes the tests the first time through or requires multiple test runs or formula modifications to achieve a passing average. (That amount goes to $275,000 to $500,000 for a Heavy Duty Diesel licensing program on a specific formula.) Once that testing is complete and the formula has passed all of the minimum requirements, it can be licensed for $825 per year for non-members and $625 per year for members. There is also a small royalty fee per gallon sold for all gallons over one million. The length of time between new specifications is now approximately 2 to 3 years, which does not allow a great deal of time to recover testing costs.

Who Licenses What Formulas?

Additive companies, such as Lubrizol, Ethyl,, Infinium and Oronite, develop licensed formulas that they offer to oil companies to re-license. It is inexpensive to re-license one of these formulas, and the majority of oil companies choose to do this to avoid the costs associated with testing. This, however, tends to commoditize the market. The same chemistry is being sold under many brand names. Most of the major oil companies do have their own proprietary formulas developed, tested and licensed. All of AMSOIL INC.'s lubricant formulas are unique and proprietary.

Flexibility In Manufacturing An API Licensed Formula

API licensing was originally developed for mineral based oils, and it affords these oils more flexibility than synthetic oils.

Mineral oils comprised of group I and Group II petroleum basestocks may use a simple program called basestock interchange for added flexibility in manufacturing and purchasing. Interchange means that by completing the proper paperwork and running a few minor engine tests an oil company can choose to buy these petroleum basestocks from many different suppliers. This ensures adequate supply and competitive pricing. However, basestock interchange for Group III and V synthetic basestocks is not allowed. For example, if a formula was tested with an ester (Group V) basestock from a specific supplier, then anyone blending that formula must buy only that supplier's ester. Complete engine testing would need to be performed on the formula using another supplier's ester before an oil company could buy it from that alternative supplier. This additional testing is normally not performed because of the associated costs. This inflexibility makes it very difficult for synthetic lubricant manufacturers to negotiate prices with synthetic basestock suppliers. Click HERE for more information about Group I through Group V basestocks.

There is also something called viscosity grade read-across. Fortunately, this applies to both petroleum and synthetic basestocks although the better cold temperature performance of synthetics makes it more difficult to achieve in some situations. (That's another whole story.) What this means is that if you properly formulate the lubricant for which you have run all of the API tests, there are guidelines that allow you to use that same formula to make 0W-30, 5W-30, 10W-30, etc. viscosity motor oil.

Finally, there is a rule for substitutions in the CMA (Chemical Manufacturers Association) code of practice that allows a small degree of flexibility for all formulas. It allows a company to change the percentages of components in the formula by varying amounts from the original formula with limited testing and paperwork requirements. For example, if the licensed formula used 10% of a certain V.I. improver, you would have the ability to utilize from 9% to 11% of the same V.I. improver for your formula.

Key Limitations For API Licensed Formulas

Phosphorous content - .10% maximum
(API SL; 0W-20, 5W-20, 0W-30, 5W-30, 10W-30 viscosity grades, only)

NOACK volatility - 15% maximum

Click HERE for an explanation of NOACK Volatility
The prevalent sources of phosphorous in motor oils are additives called zinc dithiophosphates (ZDTPs). Currently, these versatile additives act as oxidation/corrosion inhibitors and aid in the ability of a lubricant to reduce wear. The automobile manufacturers, however, have demanded that lubricants contain a maximum of only .10% phosphorous. Their reason is that some manufacturers believe that higher phosphorous content levels will poison the catalytic converters on their cars before they reach 150,000 miles, which is the number of miles that their vehicles will be required to pass EPA emission standards. There has not been total agreement within the automotive and lubrication industry about whether phosphorous levels over .10% actually do harm catalytic converters in the long run. What they have failed to make allowances for is the NOACK volatility of an oil.
 
Last edited:
...

The maximum allowable NOACK volatility percentage for the new SL/GF-3 passenger car motor oil specification is 15%. Most of AMSOIL motor oils are in the 5% to 8% NOACK volatility range. Studies have shown there is a correlation between NOACK volatility, oil consumption and the amount of phosphorous from motor oil that will end up in the exhaust gasses. Therefore, oils with higher levels of phosphorous but with low volatility, such as AMSOIL motor oils, present no more risk to catalytic converters than low phosphorous oils with higher NOACK volatility. This has also been demonstrated for years in actual application through state mandated exhaust gas testing on our Dealers' and customers' high mileage vehicles using AMSOIL synthetic motor oils. State inspectors are continually amazed at the low emissions levels generated by vehicles using AMSOIL products. So much for poisoning catalytic converters.

AMSOIL INC. has determined that the reduced wear and extended drain intervals achievable with phosphorous levels higher than the API limit of .10% are real benefits for the consumer, and pose no risk to catalytic converters. AMSOIL motor oils, except for the API licensed XL-7500 5W-30, 5W-20 and 10W-30 viscosity grades, all have greater than .10% phosphorous levels, and therefore, cannot be API licensed.

Why Some AMSOIL Synthetic Motor Oils Are API Licensed And Some Are Not

1. Full API licensing puts AMSOIL INC. in an inflexible position. Not only would we find it necessary to buy formula components from specific vendors and be at the mercy of their pricing, we would not be able to make any major improvements to the lubricant formulas for 2 to 3 years, without new testing and the associated costs. To solve this problem, the API must establish basestock interchange guidelines for synthetic basestocks just as they have for other basestocks, as well as develop interchange guidelines for other components too.

2. Full API licensing would impose strict phosphorous limitations on our motor oils. This limitation is the main reason most AMSOIL motor oils are not API licensed. AMSOIL INC. currently disagrees with this limitation and feels strongly that the reduced wear and longer oil and additive life achieved through higher levels of properly balanced phosphorous content is more important than the arbitrary API phosphorous limit that does not give any consideration to the NOACK volatility level of an oil. When chemistry is developed that will provide superior engine wear protection with reduced phosphorous levels, or Noack volatility considerations are put in place, then the phosphorous level will become a non-issue.

Warranties And API Licensed Motor Oils

Fortunately, the law does not allow manufacturers to "void your warranty" simply because of the brand of oil you use, the specifications it meets or the miles you drive between oil changes. To be specific, they cannot deny to fix your broken radio, faulty valve or cracked piston because you used an AMSOIL non-API licensed motor oil, or because you've gone more than 3000 miles since your last oil change. Denial of warranty coverage must be specifically due to an oil related failure. All courts of law will find against any manufacturer or dealership that tries these warranty shenanigans. If any automobile dealership insinuates that your warranty will be void if you use AMSOIL products or utilize extended drain intervals, let AMSOIL INC. know the name of the Dealership, the address, the owner's name and the name of the employee that made this statement. Mail to:

AMSOIL INC.
Attention: Technical Services Department
AMSOIL Building
Superior, WI 54880

or e-mail to [email protected].

They will almost never put it in writing, but if they do, please send us a copy of that, too. Either way, we will send them a letter informing them cease the intimidation of our customers. Click HERE to read a sample letter.

Only if the oil is determined to be the direct cause of the engine problem can a manufacturer or dealership deny warranty coverage for that specific problem. In this situation the AMSOIL warranty would apply, and the AMSOIL Technical Services Department would assist you in processing your claim and in getting the vehicle repaired. That's our pledge to you. AMSOIL INC. sells millions of gallons of oil per year and warranty claims are a rare occurrence. If you ever have a warranty problem with an automobile manufacturer or dealership, AMSOIL will assist you by analyzing the problem and providing data supporting the fact that repairs should be made under the vehicle manufacturer's warranty. If this does not resolve the problem, AMSOIL will submit a claim with our insurance company and request that an adjuster have the vehicle repaired and pursue legal settlement later if necessary. The fact is there never has been an engine failure attributed to the non-performance of AMSOIL products, and we do not expect there ever will be. If it ever did, both AMSOIL and our insurance company would make certain your problem was resolved. Click HERE to see the AMSOIL Limited Warranty.

How Does AMSOIL INC. Ensure Their Products Meet Or Exceed The Minimum Specifications Of The Tests Required For API Licensing?

First, AMSOIL INC. works closely with major additive companies to select the top performing, and usually most expensive, passenger car and heavy duty diesel motor oil additives. These additives have already passed all of the API licensing requirements in a petroleum or synthetic based formulation. Then we work with the additive company to maximize the amount of additive used and to boost the additive package in selected performance areas to achieve an optimum performing additive package for reduced wear and extended drain intervals. This is unlike the vast majority of companies who, because additives are expensive, use the minimum amount of the least expensive additives required to meet the minimum API requirements.

We then utilize a blend of synthetic basestocks with known performance characteristics as a replacement for the petroleum basestocks to optimize performance in areas of lubricity, volatility, viscosity index, oxidation and nitration resistance, pour points, flash points, deposit control, soot handling, emissions, etc. We also will utilize a highly shear stable V.I. improver to ensure viscosity retention throughout extended drain intervals. This replaces the inexpensive and less shear stable V.I. improver used in the API licensed petroleum formula. We do laboratory bench tests before running field tests to verify the superiority of the synthetic formula in actual use. We also continue to monitor the performance of the oil through close scrutiny of tens of thousands of oil analysis tests per year across a wide variety of vehicles all around North America and the World. AMSOIL INC. has been collecting used synthetic oil samples from passenger cars since 1982. No other oil company has such a vast data base of the performance of synthetic lubricants over extended drain intervals.

AMSOIL INC.'s products and formulations outperform API licensed oils. They're engineered that way. Period.

Conclusion

AMSOIL INC. takes pride in never having conformed to industry norms or standards when those standards are contrary to peak performance. We introduced synthetics to the automotive world in 1972 with the first synthetic motor oil to exceed API performance specifications. At that time other manufacturers refused to recognize the superior performance of synthetic motor oils. Now, however, most companies sell synthetic lubricants, vehicles are factory filled with synthetic motor oils and gear lubes, and some manufacturers even offer extended warranties if you use synthetics. AMSOIL has always offered extended drain intervals because the oil was capable of performing for extended drains, and it was the right thing to do for the consumer. Now the entire industry is moving in that direction. Ironically, it was recently published that automotive manufacturers will be recommending extended drain intervals of up to 15,000 miles in the near future because that's what consumers want.

AMSOIL is a company of firsts. That doesn't happen by always conforming to industry norms and standards.

API licensing of lubricants is voluntary, and it ensures automobile manufacturers and consumers that the product meets a set of minimum standards. Should these standards, in the future, be raised to a level consistent with AMSOIL's standards for motor oil performance, AMSOIL will consider licensing all oils. For those that feel pressured to use an API licensed product, we have them and encourage you to use them (XLT, XLM, XLF and PCO). AMSOIL does offer better performing motor oils that are not API licensed for all of the reasons explained in this response. They provide our customers with alternatives to the commodity products typically available in the market today. If you want the convenience of extended drain intervals or the top performance from your vehicle, AMSOIL has taken time to engineer the very best money can buy.
Ed Kellerman
Manager, Amsoil Tech Services
 
Bluto very interesting and informative

"Only if the oil is determined to be the direct cause of the engine problem can a manufacturer or dealership deny warranty coverage for that specific problem. In this situation the AMSOIL warranty would apply, and the AMSOIL Technical Services Department would assist you in processing your claim and in getting the vehicle repaired".

This is the part I was refering too. I would like too see what you get back from Toyota, but I am sure that they will claim that the oil has to have the donut on the bottle, like Mobil 1 does. It's the above quoted statement that concerns me. If I have a oil/lube related problem with my engine while I am under the 5 year 60K mile warranty I don't want to be caught between Amsoil and Toyota while they try to sort it out. I knew of a guy that got caught between Dodge and Fram over a filter that blew-up while he was driving down the road. Dodge claimed it was a filter problem Fram claimed it was a engine oil pressure problem. Dodge stated that he was using a Fram filter that they said was not "authorized" and had been listed as such by Dodge. Took 5 months and many emails by other Dodge Turbo diesel registry members before Dodge decided to fix his Cummins Turbo diesel, during this time he was without his vehicle. I now use Toyota filters and API with the donut on it oil while I'm under warranty. Not a big deal, I just don't want to be in the middle, not worth the hassle, since Toyota filters are easy to get and Mobil 1 is good oil and easy to get. I am sure Amsoil is GREAT oil but that does not mean that something else can't go wrong with the internals of our V8 engine during the warranty period and I don't want to give Toyota or any other large corporation the ability to point their finger at the oil or the oil change interval and say we think it was your fault, trust me with my luck that is what they would do. :mad:
 
Last edited:
Again, Mobil 1 will provide just as good protection as Amsoil. They are both rated at the top of most/if not all tests/comparisons. It's just a matter of that FUZZY feeling.

Koz
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,310
Messages
3,554,079
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top