UTEP
New member
Hi,
I know this has been discussed to death, as I have read pretty much everything on this an YT and other forums. One thing that seems to be ignored is location and orientation. I also put size in my title as my concerns there are part of it.
Location:
Most seem to use the spacers and leave the recommended 1/8" gap. There is plenty of room on my 2000 Limited to get a 70268, the 3/4" 13k btu model, more than an inch away. BUT does it need to be closer so the fan can draw air through it?
Orientation:
Vertical or horizontal? Vertical with hoses above and below on the passenger side seems the best idea but more people seem to mount horizontal with the inlet/outlet both on top. I'm not sure how the tranny circulates fluid but guess it's a lower pressure system. With that in mind the vertical will be able to use gravity on the return...
Size:
Seems most folks in the desert SW use the 70264 model for greater cooling. This is rated at ~14k btu. It has a smaller footprint but is thicker. 2x as thick. My thinking is the thinner should be more effective. I'm probably messing up my physics but it seems a larger flatter/thinner object would cool more effectively than a smaller fatter/thicker surface. I know the 70264,smaller fatter/thicker surface, has more over all surface area but unsure if it is that big of a deal....
I've been accused of over thinking some things...
Warren
I know this has been discussed to death, as I have read pretty much everything on this an YT and other forums. One thing that seems to be ignored is location and orientation. I also put size in my title as my concerns there are part of it.
Location:
Most seem to use the spacers and leave the recommended 1/8" gap. There is plenty of room on my 2000 Limited to get a 70268, the 3/4" 13k btu model, more than an inch away. BUT does it need to be closer so the fan can draw air through it?
Orientation:
Vertical or horizontal? Vertical with hoses above and below on the passenger side seems the best idea but more people seem to mount horizontal with the inlet/outlet both on top. I'm not sure how the tranny circulates fluid but guess it's a lower pressure system. With that in mind the vertical will be able to use gravity on the return...
Size:
Seems most folks in the desert SW use the 70264 model for greater cooling. This is rated at ~14k btu. It has a smaller footprint but is thicker. 2x as thick. My thinking is the thinner should be more effective. I'm probably messing up my physics but it seems a larger flatter/thinner object would cool more effectively than a smaller fatter/thicker surface. I know the 70264,smaller fatter/thicker surface, has more over all surface area but unsure if it is that big of a deal....
I've been accused of over thinking some things...
Warren