I went out to look at some household items with the wife today, we both had off , the tire place I was going to drop my truck off at did not have any openings , so we went on our way and always take the 4R. As I was driving down the road I see this FF tire co. so I stop to get a price , look around , get their price on Revos , then I notice the Nokian Vatiiva there , never see it in person , similar design as Revo , but yet quite a bit different when side by side comparison. The peaked my interest ,slightly more aggressive then the Revo. I have done a search and read what people have to say here . As you know I want an AT tire and the Vatiiva seemed like a good choice (visually at least) .
Anyone ..... good , bad , or the ugly ??? Wondering about strength , off road ability , they don't have a P rated (per say) on the tire , but the sales dufus said it's because they are between a P and an LT ( I found the say P metric tire o0n the sire saying UTQG as 460 ) far as strength goes. Thought's ?? The guy there said he never had any complaints and they are "tough off road AT tires" , like he would say anything else....lol.
265/70/17 = $155.00 each + $20 each mt. and balance . about $40 less a pc from Revos .
What does this mean ??
UTQG of the Nokian is 460 a/b
UTQG of the Revo is 500 a/b
Anyone ..... good , bad , or the ugly ??? Wondering about strength , off road ability , they don't have a P rated (per say) on the tire , but the sales dufus said it's because they are between a P and an LT ( I found the say P metric tire o0n the sire saying UTQG as 460 ) far as strength goes. Thought's ?? The guy there said he never had any complaints and they are "tough off road AT tires" , like he would say anything else....lol.
265/70/17 = $155.00 each + $20 each mt. and balance . about $40 less a pc from Revos .
What does this mean ??
UTQG of the Nokian is 460 a/b
UTQG of the Revo is 500 a/b