I know this has been covered several times but recently I read that some people are using moly in the slip yoke. I read many years ago that moly is designed for metal parts to slip past one another and not allow them to roll. Which wouldn't wouldn't be good for needle bearings in a ujoint but good for the slip yoke.
However, there is a diagram somewhere on this forum that shows NLGI #2 multi purpose being used in all slip yokes and all Ujoints except the 3 zirks aft the Tcase on a 4wd. In which case moly is used in the latter.
I've been following the diagram against my better judgement but I'm thinking that moly should be used in the slip yokes and multipurpose in all the Ujoints including the ones aft the Tcase. Curious as to what the masses here are doing.
I actually did a stupid amount of research on this topic and posted my summary here:
http://www.toyota-4runner.org/3rd-gen-t4rs/97006-drive-prop-shaft-greasing-guide.html
Toyota is inconsistent in what they specified. Toyota dealerships are inconsistent as well; it seems they typically only use 1 type of grease, probably MP. And there is a pretty good record out there of people using Moly grease in high speed bearings.
Its a safe assumption the engineers at Toyota specified it a certain way for a reason.
I am also am an engineer and understand its 2 grease types for some reason. A reason I don't need to understand completely. What I do understand is that the expert on the 4runner driveshaft determined it was 2 grease types.
I have little doubt there was a discussion at Toyota about this very issue. It drove extra complexity into the drawing, the assembly, the maintenance documentation, parts inventory requirements for the model, etc, etc. A company, especially one like Toyota, would not add complexity unless it was required to meet some performance or life threshold.
... off soapbox.
- cheers
Automotive engineer here; I used to think this way too, until I started working more closely with the car companies. They have not thought through every little detail of the vehicle the way we think they have. I think it is completely reasonable to believe that they specified different greases, but didn't really understand why they specified them. They do that kind of thing all the time.
Here's the conversation they probably had at Toyota... "Hey engineer, you need to specify a grease for the service manual." "Oh, uh, I used Moly grease in my testing..." "That's more expensive, is regular grease sufficient?" "Uh, probably, but I don't know for sure because I only used moly grease in my tests..." "Oh, well we better specify moly grease then."
Then a year or 2 later: "Hey, why do we specify Moly grease for the slip yokes? It's more expensive, we could save money be specifying regular grease" "Uh, I don't know, the guy that did the testing on this works for Honda now" "well shoot. We really want to reduce cost here. Can you see a reason not the use regular grease?" "No, but VW and Honda both specify regular grease in their's" "Oh, well then it's probably fine. Done and done, we just saved $30k per year. Bonus for us!!!"
Trust me, those kinds of conversations happen. I have heard them. I have been in them. It's engineering judgement, and there is no way around it.