Engine or auto trans. Which will die first?

Which will die first?

  • 3.4L Engine

    Votes: 1 3.2%
  • Auto Trans

    Votes: 30 96.8%

  • Total voters
    31

blaze17

New member
350k seems to be the average life of a well maintained 3.4L. What about the automatic transmissions?
 
Register to hide this ad
Trans by far. Most owners will at least try and change the oil. Trans fluid, ah no even despite the WS claim of lifetime.
 
Trans by far. Most owners will at least try and change the oil. Trans fluid, ah no even despite the WS claim of lifetime.
ok, maybe you're correct, come to think about it, the trans DOES have wearable parts, like the clutch pack, and IMO, the torque converter.

so yeah, I can see the trans going before the engine, even with 'perfect' maintenance... but I don't think it'll be at 350k.
 
I would suspect that a well maintained engine would outlive a well maintained auto transmission. Add to that the fact that more owners pay attention to engine maintenance and less so to transmission maintenance and things skew even further towards the trans crapping out first. That's my $.02, anyway.
 
Is a cracked head considered an engine failure? What about a failed head gasket? Engines require a lot more upkeep. Change the fluid and filter on the trans every 30-40k and you're good.
 
350k seems to be the average life of a well maintained 3.4L. What about the automatic transmissions?

I also heard that 96.7% of all statistics are made up - just like this one. Where did you pull the data to justify your statement?

EDIT: Take out the mileage and it would be a more realistic question. However, there are far too many variables that will skew this data. Is it a daily driver, lifted, armor, 35's, supercharged, stock, well maintained, second owner, used as a utility vehicles etc...etc...

IMHO the tranny will go before the engine regardless of the mileage. The 5VZ is a very robust engine.
 
Last edited:
350k mileage aside, I think the transmission is probably the more likely of the two to have a significant failure.

Automatic transmissions have friction plates that are eventually going to go bad no matter how well they're treated. Obviously Toyota has figured out how to make them last a long time, but they won't last forever.

The engine won't last forever either, but if it's properly lubricated and operated within it's designed temperature range it has the potential to last a lot longer.
 
The variable to this question also depends on what modifications have been done to the 4R. Supercharger? yeah; better upgrade the trans or it will not last forever. I am currently working on an upgraded solution for my transmission now. I have a supercharger that has been on the motor for all but 10-15k miles of the 4R's 220k miles.
 
The variable to this question also depends on what modifications have been done to the 4R. Supercharger? yeah; better upgrade the trans or it will not last forever. I am currently working on an upgraded solution for my transmission now. I have a supercharger that has been on the motor for all but 10-15k miles of the 4R's 220k miles.



I want to know what you come up with. I also did the SC when my runner had about 209K. I just try to keep my foot off the skinny pedal... But it's nowhere near as fun!
 
I want to know what you come up with. I also did the SC when my runner had about 209K. I just try to keep my foot off the skinny pedal... But it's nowhere near as fun!

Foot off skinny pedal? ha let me know how that works. Currently I am trying to find a local shop that will rebuild my trans with kevlar plates, up the line pressure, and install a higher stall speed torque convertor. That seems to be the common line of thought for setting up a transmission for a SC.
 
Original owner of my truck had the manual transmission replaced at around 200k miles. The PO didn't know why, but everything else on the truck seems like it was well maintained by the OO (PO, not so much). It must have been something catastrophic to warrant the replacement because I have the receipts for it and it was way over $1k. So the manual can and does fail, I just wish I knew why. For what it's worth, proper maintenance FTW.
 
Original owner of my truck had the manual transmission replaced at around 200k miles. The PO didn't know why, but everything else on the truck seems like it was well maintained by the OO (PO, not so much). It must have been something catastrophic to warrant the replacement because I have the receipts for it and it was way over $1k. So the manual can and does fail, I just wish I knew why. For what it's worth, proper maintenance FTW.

FWIW, my local and trusted Toyota specialist (Jesse at ATLR) said that resting your hand on the shifter with a cup of coffee in your hand (basically applying downward pressure on the shifter) can prematurely wear some bearings, depending on what gear you're in. First time I ever heard that theory, but apparently he's seen it a few times. :crazy:
 
So it looks like I need to start planning for eventual trans failure. So what do people usually do? Have it rebuilt? How much will that cost?
 
I've heard that a number of times over the years. I used to do performance driving events and one of the things the instructors would always say was not to put lateral pressure on the shifter because it would wear on the shims. Of course they might have just wanted to make sure everyone kept both hands on the steering wheel. Ultimately I don't know how applicable any of those things are these days with the advancements in materials and such, but to this day I only touch the shifter when shifting.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
278,306
Messages
3,554,045
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top