GGFerrier's 2000 Limited Build Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
[MENTION=144462]Sean K.[/MENTION] While I appreciate your shenanigans, 4Reak is not uninvolved. He has every right to comment after all he was the target of the first post by Mike. As for the wheels... That deal was made outside of T4R.org and had nothing to do with this forum until Mike (a person uninvolved in the agreement) brought it here. It was made outside T4R and that's where it should have stayed.

There was a disagreement and was settled by the two parties involved outside T4R. That's all the juicy detail you're getting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I appreciate your honesty as well as your confidence. My tool bound logic was clearly a clever remark towards an amatuer who doesn't want to hear experiences based on factual findings from a 10 year, all-I've-ever-known-as-a-human, Mechanic. However, my arguement would be as follows:

Competence would be shown with a display of success IMO. When a person becomes more and more successful (or in this case, continues to be competent) they then have the luxury to afford those super expensive tools. That's why successful businessman drives Mercedes and not Hyundais. Yeah, both get you where need to be, but at some point you have the ability to step your game up if you're successful at what you do. He's a hobbyist. Good for him and all of us that like to tinker. Hands on is a lost art.

These Craftsman users probably flip the extra buck for the expensive truck parts however. Short cutting tools, paying out the ass for an oil filter. It's an interesting conundrum isn't it?
JFYI: I'm an equal opportunity tool user. Whatever gets the job done. My original comment was directed at an individual who did not display the needed knowledge nor skills to play major league. He's playing College ball, I'm about to retire as MVP.

No offense intended in the slightest....but I know 4 Master Mechanics and a few that have zero certification that are actually better mechanics than the guys that are "papered"...and the majority are 20+ year guys. Granted, these examples are purely anecdotal.

The point is: people are individuals. We all excel at some things and suck at others. While I agree that higher priced tools are typically better quality....I also know that most every one of those mechanics I just mentioned have come to the same realization I have: you only have so much money. If the tool will do the job without breaking and costing the mechanic money in lost hours of work, then there is little argument to be made to spend the extra money on that tool rather than putting it towards other tools that give additional capability and money making ability.

I doubt seriously that you disagree.....it *seems* your comment was mostly an attempt to use (what you thought was) a clever catch phrase and now you've repeatedly defended it. It's human nature.....we say something that can be interpreted as incorrect and we try to defend it. I'm not blaming you....nor do I harbor an ounce of ill-will towards you over it.

Your style of banter is a lot more like what I'm used to on Pirate and something that frankly, is sorely lacking around here. Busting balls is funny....but around here, people have pretty thin skin it would seem and I'm not at liberty to dive in to the depths I could while batting the ball back to your side of the net. ;)

Just a side note.....I'm not elitist at all in terms of the way I write. I am VERY careful about the wording I choose and I do so to convey meaning. Sometimes it's more concise to use "big" words......other times, I admit to being overly wordy in hopes of trying to clarify. Regardless, to claim that as hypocrisy is an abuse of the term...but whatever. This is how I write. I don't have to justify or change it for anyone else, nor will I.


Regardless, best wishes to you....I think it quite admirable that you were willing to help someone out on the forum with a brand new baby at home. I wish the baby and momma all the best as well.
 
Hey thanks! Look at that: humanity! Appreciated sir.

I also appreciate your correct use of the word "regardless". So help you if you used the dreaded "irregardless"!

Cudos!
 
[MENTION=144462]Sean K.[/MENTION] While I appreciate your shenanigans, 4Reak is not uninvolved. He has every right to comment after all he was the target of the first post by Mike. As for the wheels... That deal was made outside of T4R.org and had nothing to do with this forum until Mike (a person uninvolved in the agreement) brought it here. It was made outside T4R and that's where it should have stayed.

There was a disagreement and was settled by the two parties involved outside T4R. That's all the juicy detail you're getting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm glad you're enjoying it.....as I've told others in the past repeatedly, the best way to shut me up is to ignore me.

Now....

If you're a member of this forum and you ever intend to sell anything here....it is relevant. The fact that you're not willing to be forthcoming would *suggest* (not prove), that you know something about the deal wasn't on the up and up.

But whatever....your reputation is the most valuable thing you have. If you don't wish to defend it....that is totally your prerogative.

PS. Are you sure it was considered "settled" with the other party to their satisfaction?
 
Hey thanks! Look at that: humanity! Appreciated sir.

I also appreciate your correct use of the word "regardless". So help you if you used the dreaded "irregardless"!

Cudos!

You mean kudos? LOL.....

Not that I'm a grammar Nazi.....Lord knows I've mistyped plenty.
 
I'm glad you're enjoying it.....as I've told others in the past repeatedly, the best way to shut me up is to ignore me.

Now....

If you're a member of this forum and you ever intend to sell anything here....it is relevant. The fact that you're not willing to be forthcoming would *suggest* (not prove), that you know something about the deal wasn't on the up and up.

But whatever....your reputation is the most valuable thing you have. If you don't wish to defend it....that is totally your prerogative.

PS. Are you sure it was considered "settled" with the other party to their satisfaction?



Is this mike using a different account? For some not involved and with no skin in the game you sure keep going with it. Asked and answered bud.

Ignore you so you get the last word on my build thread... not on your life!
 
c7d430036eaa47268f2e7a00f75f177a.jpg
 
Is this mike using a different account? For some not involved and with no skin in the game you sure keep going with it. Asked and answered bud.

Ignore you so you get the last word on my build thread... not on your life!

Last word? WTF are you even talking about? Ignore means....don't respond to me....not "don't ever respond again in your own thread". Wow....did that really need to be explained?

Apparently. SMH.

I keep going simply b/c you keep responding to me. When I run out of things to say back, I'll stop or when you stop responding to me, I'll stop replying back to you. That simple.
 
First of all, we should move this discussion to the thread I created for it





Secondly, saying you're not a grammar Nazi, but then calling one out for grammitcal infractions is hypocritical...

But I digress.


You made the first reference to grammar with your comment on the use of the word "irregardless"....I was making a joke that you (clearly) didn't get since you were feigning offense to the word "irregardless" yet committed a grammar error yourself when you spelled kudos wrong.

I pointed out the irony of your mistake.....which doesn't make one a grammar Nazi. And it was meant as a joke.....apparently I should have included you in the thin skinned group here on the site.
 
Last edited:
You made the first reference to grammar with your comment on the use of the word "irregardless"....I was making a joke that you (clearly) didn't get since you were feigning offense to the word "irregardless" yet committed a grammar error yourself when you spelled kudos wrong.

I pointed out the irony of your mistake.....which doesn't make one a grammar Nazi. And it was meant as a joke.....apparently I should have included you in the thin skinned group here on the site.



Ahhhh don't tell me we're done playing?? I was just getting started my good man...

I just don't want to liter this particular thread. I'm a huge fan of organization, borderline OCD. So come on over to the sh!t talking thread and let it LOOSE!

(Pssst... My skin's so thick the U.S. Government has me on contract to harvest it and use it on submarine hulls)
 
Ahhhh don't tell me we're done playing?? I was just getting started my good man...

I just don't want to liter this particular thread. I'm a huge fan of organization, borderline OCD. So come on over to the sh!t talking thread and let it LOOSE!

(Pssst... My skin's so thick the U.S. Government has me on contract to harvest it and use it on submarine hulls)

No, we can continue if you'd like.....I just don't know where the thread you're referencing is located and I highly doubt this site has a truly no holds barred thread...

Where's the fun in it if one can't use his full arsenal?

As for you just getting started.....

These seem to be the best exhibits of your internet keyboard fighting skills.....

There's no doubt he's gonna go with you bro. Done STELLAR work so far. Plus the over-the-pants handy is a killer incentive as well as the meat you're serving up on a regular basis.

I don't tell you how to fight fires, don't tell me how to fix cars. There's a reason your garage is full of "CRAFTSMAN" tools. You're a craftsman. I'm a professional.


And while the homoerotic references are pretty funny....I'm also pretty sure it's the kind of fare that would violate the TOS here.

Seems like you're kinda one dimensional and limited to d!ck jokes. :) Whatever floats your boat though, bro. I'm not here to judge. ;)
 
No, we can continue if you'd like.....I just don't know where the thread you're referencing is located and I highly doubt this site has a truly no holds barred thread...



Where's the fun in it if one can't use his full arsenal?



As for you just getting started.....



These seem to be the best exhibits of your internet keyboard fighting skills.....









And while the homoerotic references are pretty funny....I'm also pretty sure it's the kind of fare that would violate the TOS here.



Seems like you're kinda one dimensional and limited to d!ck jokes. :) Whatever floats your boat though, bro. I'm not here to judge. ;)



I referenced trash talk thread, post #189 should have a link to it. I also mentioned and quoted you to it so perhaps your vast knowledge of computing and Internet skills will warrant a search including my sweet awesome tag name and something like "trash talk" to establish the necessary treasure. Don't feel bad man. Some of us just take a little longer to get off that hamster wheel. Kids these days am I right?

And yes, it's unlikely to be a full blown Aristocrats Joke, but I'm a gentleman. There's a certain way we civilized folk can poke fun at one another in a creative way.

It's unfortunate you see my humor one-dimensionally. Not only do I have missionary, I also have cowgirl, and the lazy dog. No big deal ;) I did say I've been with upwards of 3 different ladies.

I don't talk smack about other's rigs nor ladies (I'm a gentleman remember) and since I know nothing more about you than just another body in my way when the apocalypse hits, it's hard to make a clever witty remark.
 
[MENTION=144462]Sean K.[/MENTION] I get it, you identify as an ******* and that self identification is a cornerstone of your personality. Trouble is your not an *******... you're just annoying. You think that going on someone's build thread and offering an opinion that no one asked for, in a discussion you're not involved in means you're an *******, wrong you're just annoying. You say things like I'll stop if you ignore me, again not an *******... just annoying.

So we can keep going and completely destroy the continuity of my build thread. I have no emotional attachment to it.

Clearly you came here looking for a fight and looking to ruin this thread. So congrats, you've done both.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I referenced trash talk thread, post #189 should have a link to it. I also mentioned and quoted you to it so perhaps your vast knowledge of computing and Internet skills will warrant a search including my sweet awesome tag name and something like "trash talk" to establish the necessary treasure. Don't feel bad man. Some of us just take a little longer to get off that hamster wheel. Kids these days am I right?

And yes, it's unlikely to be a full blown Aristocrats Joke, but I'm a gentleman. There's a certain way we civilized folk can poke fun at one another in a creative way.

It's unfortunate you see my humor one-dimensionally. Not only do I have missionary, I also have cowgirl, and the lazy dog. No big deal ;) I did say I've been with upwards of 3 different ladies.

I don't talk smack about other's rigs nor ladies (I'm a gentleman remember) and since I know nothing more about you than just another body in my way when the apocalypse hits, it's hard to make a clever witty remark.

I appreciate how much of a shine you've taken to me (next you'll be inviting me over for hot showers......given your obvious penchant for gay jokes, LOL)....but frankly, I have pretty low interest in 'trash talking' with you.

Maybe some other time.

Only thing I really planned to say with regards to you in this thread was this:

The correlation of tool brand to level of proficiency is hardly proof of competency.

And I've made that point. It's not even something you could argue, so I don't see us having need for additional correspondence.

Grilling some steaks now though.....maybe later. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,313
Messages
3,554,090
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top