GOP Presidential Candidates

Well you know what they say about statistics dropping ... the numbers are usually made up.


This picture is of the US House of Representatives election in Texas in 2004, same day as the Presidential Election.

Texas was Republican by 57%, Democrats won 39% in the US House.

The two pictures above showing a 2004 to 2008 seem to be very wrong.


:peace:

how are the pictures wrong?
 
Lets try and have a productive conversation regarding race and the Republican party

Probably a better idea not to talk about race at all on this thread. Everyone running for President (including the President) wants to avoid the topic and there are so many other good topics.
 
by no means am i saying that this will happen in the event that texas goes blue, however it's happened in the united states before. the electoral college isn't there for the benefit of the people, the idea of it is that the electoral college chooses who it thinks is best for the country, that was the idea at least. popular vote wasn't always considered in presidential elections.

I think you have a misunderstanding of the electoral college system. Electors are generally chosen by their party. That means if the Democrats win, they would send people they choose to vote in the Electoral College process. Meaning, there is a very slim chance they would switch parties.

Yes, electors have gone against the popular vote 83 times before, however none have ever changed the outcome of an election.
 
Are you saying that if the popular vote in Texas were to go blue, the electorates from the electoral college would go against the will of the people and support the Republican candidate or did you mean something else?

...

Yes, electors have gone against the popular vote 83 times before, however none have ever changed the outcome of an election.

now you're just being a troll.

I think you have a misunderstanding of the electoral college system. Electors are generally chosen by their party. That means if the Democrats win, they would send people they choose to vote in the Electoral College process. Meaning, there is a very slim chance they would switch parties.

you're right. my bad.

Well it seems to me that the first picture of a mostly blue Texas implies that Democrats won Texas in 2004. They didnt.

If the blue doesnt represent Democrats then at the min, it is confusing. At least it snagged me up reading from my phone.

sorry for the confusion. not sure why they switched the colors.
 
now you're just being a troll.

How am I being a troll? There is a difference between the electoral college and the electors.

I said electors have gone against the popular vote of their state 83 times, however I said it never changed the outcome of an election. In the end the electoral college vote is what matters, as it is what decides who becomes president, not a few defacto electors. What I said in my question is true, the electoral college has never gone against the will of the people as a whole.
 
Lets solve this. michael833 said it was messed up. Here is a corrected one.
 

Attachments

  • texas-2004-2008 (1).jpg
    texas-2004-2008 (1).jpg
    60.7 KB · Views: 216
The election process goes on way too long. Both parted are to blame. You shouldn't need a year to figure out who you are going to vote for.
 
Rob Portman for VP? I just don't see it. He is bland (have met in person, briefly). Yes, I can't form my feelings on him about a 30 seconds meeting, however that is how voters will judge him that way.

I think it is media hype. Really no news out right now.

Rubio is interesting, however I don't know how much substance is there.

What are you guys thinking?
 

are you implying that this Republican nomination is done??

cuz its most definitely not.

I was elected as a Delegate to my county, district and then state conventions and I can tell you that Romney does not have even close to enough delegates.

Heres some news with the truth about how things are going.

Ron Paul won Colorado, Minnesota, is going to win Iowa, Missouri, Texas and probably Maine.

Edit: Ron Paul also feels very good about Nevada and California...

This is far from over.

for those that dont know how the delegate process works, its even more convoluted than the electoral college or the BCS.. this should help clear it up some.

All Delegates Belong to Ron Paul "The Rachel Maddow Show" - YouTube

Then for some real news telling the real truth about the delegate counts

Ron Paul gets the last laugh in Iowa & Minnesota MSNBC 4/23/12 - YouTube

Fox News Admits Ron Paul Could Win Iowa! - YouTube

Rumors of Ron Paul campaign demise greatly exaggerated | Washington Times Communities

RMSMC :: Santorum Supporters Ensure Ron Paul?s Colorado Delegate Coup Catches Attention of Mainstream Press

If you want more info, I have more. As someone who was part of sending a huge group of Delegates to Tampa from Colorado, I got to be a part of something special.
 
Remember these?

"I promise 100% transparency in my administration.".
"I promise NO NEW TAXES on a family making less than $250K a year.".
"I will allow 5 days of public comment before I sign any bills.".
"I will remove earmarks from PORK projects before I sign any bill.".
"I will end Income Tax for seniors making less than $50K a year.".
"I will bring ALL of our troops home within ONE year."
"I'll put the Health Care negotiations on CSPAN so everyone can see who is at the table!".
"I'll have no lobbyists in my administration."
"I'll close Guantanamo."
"I'll resign if I don't cut the deficit in half by the end of four years."
"I'll unite the people of this great country."

BETTER KNOWN AS LIES.
:shrug:
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,316
Messages
3,554,120
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top