Hard time deciding....

[4RunnerKyle]

I have a 1999 highlander with pretty bad rear sag so it's time to do the whole suspension so I'm going to splurge on an ultimate lift.... Now, I have brand new 265/75/16s... I can't decide on whether to get the 890s or the 906s in the rear as I do mostly expedition travel.... Which of the two rear setups would be the way to go? I will get the billies 5125 either way

 

[t4r4life]

deff not 906, its too harsh of a ride and don't lift enough. 890 would be good if you load a LOT of stuff, personally i would go with 891 if you had to go the OME way.

 

[clemson4r]

deff not 906, its too harsh of a ride and don't lift enough. 890 would be good if you load a LOT of stuff, personally i would go with 891 if you had to go the OME way.

Uhh, other way around on the 890 vs. 891. 891's are for 'heavier loads'

Max

 

[Millerad1651]

I would personally go with the 906s. They are a 2" lift coil, and I felt they were pretty comfortable. If you do a lot of expo traveling, you're more than likely going to have a lot of weight in the back. The 906s will handle the weight pretty well.
If you choose to go with a 3" lift, the 891s are a firmer spring than the 890s, and will handle the weight better. However, your ride may be a bit harsh unloaded.

 

[deverlow]

I've got 891s and OME Nitrochargers in the rear. They're not too firm or harsh but actually feel "solid." It feels very stable and in control and I've got relatively little weight in the back; tool box, cooler, misc stuff and occasionally my spare goes on the roof basket.

 

[t4r4life]

Uhh, other way around on the 890 vs. 891. 891's are for 'heavier loads'

Max

Doe! yeah what ^ said:hiding: