ads2539
New member
The reason is for looks, but they make the tire swing a larger arc when turning which creates more interference.
Will a 285 tire rub the UCAs without spacers?
(I have only 255s and 265s.)
The reason is for looks, but they make the tire swing a larger arc when turning which creates more interference.

Will a 285 tire rub the UCAs without spacers?
(I have only 255s and 265s.)
Will a 285 tire rub the UCAs without spacers?
(I have only 255s and 265s.)
Good point, they probably will with a 4Runner wheel. With the stock 17" sport wheels and 285's my tires rubbed the spindle and couldn't even be mounted.
With OP's FJ wheels he *should* be fine. Factory FJ wheels should space the tire out enough it should clear is my guess.
First thing to note is that suspension lifts only clear bigger tires at ride height. As soon as you stuff the tire in the front wheel well, the lift amount doesn't really matter
Second, is that the Caster number itself isn't really a trustworthy measure for the amount of clearance for the tires. As you know, caster is the angle between the line from UBJ to LBJ, and vertical. When lifting the 4runner IFS, while keeping the camber in spec, the caster tends to drop out. This could make keeping the wheels straight on the highway more difficult, wheel not return to center after turns as effectively as stock, etc. JBA UCAs are great for bolt on caster correction back to stock 3* to improve drivability back to stock.
I made a little picture below to try and explain some things better. Background rectangles are reference of LCA mounting positions, and body mount location.
- The main drawback is that +Caster from the UCA brings the tire backwards in the wheel well, as seen in the first image. While increasing drivability, clearance at the body mount and rear of wheel well is sacrificed. If I remember correctly, you mentioned stock UCAs didn't rub as bad as the JBAs, this is likely why. However, your JBAs will ride better than the stock when lifted due to the increase in caster, and I believe there is more UBJ travel on the JBAs, and the angle is corrected to keep them more centered in that travel.
- +Caster from the LCA brings the wheel forward. You can set this by adjusting the cam bolts so the front is all of the way in, and the rear is all the way out. The problem with a fixed position UCA, is that this will likely throw off the camber.
- The capability of adjustable UCAs, like SPCs, allow you to decrease Caster at the UCA, increase Caster at the LCA, and finally adjust the camber into spec. This will result in maximum clearance, with the potential sacrifice of overall caster depending on the tire size. From here, its balancing the tire size with the UCA caster adjustment to get them to fit, while also retaining drivability.
I'm a fan of adjustable UCAs for this reason, but it doesn't necessarily mean they're the best for your setup. JBAs or other fixed UCAs are great, because you can take to any firestone or wherever, and they only adjust the cams like stock would. Most alignment places would never touch SPCs, and lots of people end up aligning them at home.
The offset of the wheel also plays a role in the fitment. As Inv4drZm mentioned, more negative offset from the spacers increases the scrub radius. More scrub radius can also cause the tire to rub things as the wheels turn left and right. This is also a balance, because the increased backspacing from the spacer will help to space the tire away from the UCA. With JBAs especially, the flat part where the UBJ mounts is fairly wide. Without spacers, it may be tight or contact the UCA, but you'll never know without giving it a shot.
So working with what you have, I'd suggest first removing the spacers and seeing if that helps with the rubbing on the body mount. Check the UCA for rubbing there, as discussed above. If that doesn't work, remount the spacers and evaluate chopping the body mount. (side note: if the spacers were previously loctited, you need to clean all the threads really well and remove all the threadlocker remains before reattaching, or the buildup will cause them to reach torque spec before they're at the desired tightness)
Hopefully that makes sense, always a balancing game when fitting bigger tires on a vehicle that wasn't intended to have any more than a 265/65r17 on there
![]()
wow, thanks for the thorough explanation man! You're correct the body mount rub got a little worse with the JBA's. Not a ton, but a little for sure. I would also say the handling on highways / overall responsiveness is better with them. So that adds up per your feedback on them. I wish I would've known this about SPC's before buying the JBAs, sounds like they would have helped but c'est la vie, for now I'll try making the JBAs work. Unless anyone wants to buy them off me here lol.
I'll give taking out the spacers a shot and see what happens, as well as talk with an offroad shop and see what they can do with my alignment. If that doesn't do it, looks like the BMC it is, as well as probably some new front coils for good measure. Are the any aftermarket LCA's that would allow for greater adjustability?