Hope for the best prepare for the worst.How are you prepping for the covid-19 virus.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's a chart showing the number of intensive care beds per 100000 inhabitants. There are some interesting conclusions to be drawn from this chart.
 

Attachments

  • 630x356.jpg
    630x356.jpg
    40.3 KB · Views: 112
Last edited:
Here's an interesting video if you have 13 and a half minutes

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/8A3jiM2FNR8" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
RichinRidgewood said:

-The Hamptons are calling on New York Governor Andrew Cuomo to issue a travel ban from the city, to stop New Yorkers invading their towns


Hamptons wants to ban New York virus refugees as Rhode Island sends National Guard to find them | Daily Mail Online
Click to expand...


I wonder if they know that the people invading the Hamptons from NYC, own weekend summer homes there. Without said individuals the Hamptons would be nothing. From west Hampton to east Hampton, Sag Harbor to south Hampton, all very wealthy homes built by those who live in western Nassau county and NYC. If i had the choice to be on lock down, i will pick the home with under ground pool and a tennis court. Its peak season for the summer. This is what the rich and shameless do every year. Next they will cancel the "white party" that will upset more then a few.
 
The covid-19 pandemic could be a once in a century evidence fiasco according to an epidemiologist at Stanford

In the coronavirus pandemic, we're making decisions without reliable data

And an Oxford based research group has stopped using WHO data because it’s faulty, full of errors, useless.

Oxford-Based Group Stops Using WHO Data for Coronavirus Reporting, Citing Errors - Foundation for Economic Education

This hysteria and economic ruin is starting to look like a hoax built on bad data and faulty models, and reported on by those who failed common core.
 
Last edited:
Rapid_Amble said:
The covid-19 pandemic could be a once in a century evidence fiasco according to an epidemiologist at Stanford

In the coronavirus pandemic, we're making decisions without reliable data

And an Oxford based research group has stopped using WHO data because it’s faulty, full of errors, useless.

Oxford-Based Group Stops Using WHO Data for Coronavirus Reporting, Citing Errors - Foundation for Economic Education

This hysteria and economic ruin is starting to look like a hoax built on bad data and faulty models, and reported on by those who failed common core.
Click to expand...

Huh, weird. Stop spreading conspiracy theories. Lol. :boink:
 
Rapid_Amble said:
The covid-19 pandemic could be a once in a century evidence fiasco according to an epidemiologist at Stanford

In the coronavirus pandemic, we're making decisions without reliable data

And an Oxford based research group has stopped using WHO data because it’s faulty, full of errors, useless.

Oxford-Based Group Stops Using WHO Data for Coronavirus Reporting, Citing Errors - Foundation for Economic Education

This hysteria and economic ruin is starting to look like a hoax built on bad data and faulty models, and reported on by those who failed common core.
Click to expand...

There’s lots of information to take in and weed through during the shutdown. Concerning the first linked article:

In the coronavirus pandemic, we're making decisions without reliable data

Thanks for posting this opinion piece. But don’t forget to read the comments at the bottom of the article. They are generally in disagreement with the author.

I agree that we need more and better data to make good plans and decisions. But the author makes no suggestion as how to do this.

I did learn something, though. The word “hecatomb”.

: an ancient Greek and Roman sacrifice of 100 oxen or cattle.
: the sacrifice or slaughter of many victims.

Once again, to get a bigger picture read the comments.
 
RichinRidgewood said:
March 29, 2020

Johns Hopkins Chinese Virus Tracking

World Fatalities due to Chinese Virus to date 31.77k

World Average Yearly fatalities due to flu 647k

Economic Suffering Index (need to find measurement for this)

Dow Jones -21.8%
FTSE 100 -26.8%

Coronavirus: A visual guide to the economic impact - BBC News
Click to expand...


This shutdown is really screwing up the whole world economy. It seems we need to virus test mass quantities of the population, and often, to get the data necessary to decide who and when they go back to work.
 
RichinRidgewood said:
Its good to know there are still some people not effected by the hysteria

'With all the craziness going on in the world, America should show people that this is not something that should shut down countries,' he said

Georgia man who had coronavirus says US is overreacting to outbreak | Daily Mail Online
Click to expand...

I'm pretty confident the 16yr old with no comorbidities on ECMO who's looking at a sub 10% chance of surviving at my local hospital would disagree with the Georgia guy...
 
RichinRidgewood said:
March 29, 2020

Johns Hopkins Chinese Virus Tracking

World Fatalities due to Chinese Virus to date 31.77k

World Average Yearly fatalities due to flu 647k

Economic Suffering Index (need to find measurement for this)

Dow Jones -21.8%
FTSE 100 -26.8%

Coronavirus: A visual guide to the economic impact - BBC News
Click to expand...

Not trying to be a butthead or anything, but just crunching the numbers quickly and basically, and I know that there's still going to be exponential growth for the coronavirus and the R0 and survival statistics are different between the two, but still. Basic crunching with the 32k deaths so far (let's call it 3 months) puts us on track for 128k deaths in a year. That's way lower than the regular flu.

How is the regular flu not overwhelming hospitals yet still killing so many people? Are there just that many people in the hospitals at one time that even though there are lots the hospitals have the capacity for it? Are people more commonly dying of the flu at home?

I'm not trying to downplay the seriousness of the coronavirus. It is very serious, especially with the R0 and survival statistics. I'm of the mind to think that there was some sort of leaked bioweapon incident at the facility near the market. I definitely think the world should rethink its priorities in light of the CCP covering up the coronavirus in the early days and putting the whole world in this craptacular situation. (DON'T PROP UP THE CCP BECAUSE THEIR LABOR IS SO CHEAP AND THEIR SMALL PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION YET STILL NUMERICALLY LARGE MIDDLE CLASS IS LUCRATIVE.) Still, is there something I'm missing when thinking about the basic numbers?
 
One thing we keep hearing is “it’s not as bad as the flu, according to my calculations the deaths are less than the x thousand flu deaths...” etc.

Remember that these Covid-19 deaths do not replace flu deaths. They are in *addition* to flu deaths. And the outbreak is not over. No one knows the ultimate total. There will be more corona viruses in the future. Hopefully the world will respond better next time.
 
Gamma Ray said:
Not trying to be a butthead or anything, but just crunching the numbers quickly and basically, and I know that there's still going to be exponential growth for the coronavirus and the R0 and survival statistics are different between the two, but still. Basic crunching with the 32k deaths so far (let's call it 3 months) puts us on track for 128k deaths in a year. That's way lower than the regular flu.

How is the regular flu not overwhelming hospitals yet still killing so many people? Are there just that many people in the hospitals at one time that even though there are lots the hospitals have the capacity for it? Are people more commonly dying of the flu at home?

I'm not trying to downplay the seriousness of the coronavirus. It is very serious, especially with the R0 and survival statistics. I'm of the mind to think that there was some sort of leaked bioweapon incident at the facility near the market. I definitely think the world should rethink its priorities in light of the CCP covering up the coronavirus in the early days and putting the whole world in this craptacular situation. (DON'T PROP UP THE CCP BECAUSE THEIR LABOR IS SO CHEAP AND THEIR SMALL PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION YET STILL NUMERICALLY LARGE MIDDLE CLASS IS LUCRATIVE.) Still, is there something I'm missing when thinking about the basic numbers?
Click to expand...

Is the Chinese Virus a BIOWEAPON China used to PUNISH HONG KONG but went out of control?


Virus Brings Out Ugly Side of Hong Kong'''s Protest Movement | Time
 
ElectroBoy said:
One thing we keep hearing is “it’s not as bad as the flu, according to my calculations the deaths are less than the x thousand flu deaths...” etc.

Remember that these Covid-19 deaths do not replace flu deaths. They are in *addition* to flu deaths. And the outbreak is not over. No one knows the ultimate total. There will be more corona viruses in the future. Hopefully the world will respond better next time.
Click to expand...

True, especially the addition part, but it's like, there's a gargantuan number of people that die of the flu every year, and nobody seems to care.
 
ElectroBoy said:
One thing we keep hearing is “it’s not as bad as the flu, according to my calculations the deaths are less than the x thousand flu deaths...” etc.

Remember that these Covid-19 deaths do not replace flu deaths. They are in *addition* to flu deaths. And the outbreak is not over. No one knows the ultimate total. There will be more corona viruses in the future. Hopefully the world will respond better next time.
Click to expand...

Is that right? I'm not so sure.

Per the video I posted awhile ago, according to that Dr, every year up to 14% of people counted as having the flu actually have a coronavirus (SARS, MERS, or whatever).

I'd be surprised if people actually get tested in every typical year for the flu vs a coronavirus.

Goes back to what is the excess rate of infection and mortality of this coronavirus vs years past.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 3,430 (members: 0, guests: 3,430)

Forum statistics

Threads
278,315
Messages
3,554,131
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Share this page

Trending content

Back
Top