JayceeP
New member
Easy fellas. Just thought I would share my experience as threads pop up from time to time about whether BOF is really needed for a poster inquiring about the 4Runner.
So the first question I assume I will be asked is , "WHY?" Well I just got back from a 9-day vacation from South Florida and rented from the Fort Lauderdale airport. I don't like driving cars and didn't want to pay for a Yukon or Tahoe so I settled on the standard SUV category which was initially "Jeep Grand Cherokee or similar" then switched to "Hyundai Santa Fe or similar." Would have been cool to try out a JGC but oh well. Anyway, when we went to the the parkade, the guy basically grabbed the first vehicle he saw which was a 2013/2014 AWD Grey Chevrolet Traverse.
Not a bad looking vehicle. Initial observations were that it had lots of room and the driver seat leg room was awkward as my right knee/leg was against the centre console. A few inches wider and longer than the 4Runner. I didn't find it much better in terms of on road handling/driving.
For the overall trip which included a highway journey up to Disney for 2 days it was actually a pretty decent vehicle to drive. MPG wasn't really any better than the 4Runner. Did 75-80mph up the FL Turnpike to Orlando and computer said I got as high as 21.3MPG but by the time I filled up after some Orlando driving the computer was at 19.9 and I calculated 18.9- so off by 1MPG so I may have only been getting low 20s on the highway. Not bad but the 4Runner can easily get that at the same speed so I was sort of surprised.... Especially given the claim that crossovers are more efficient. The Traverse is a 4,700lb vehicle though. Power was decent but I noticed it hit higher RPMM's when accelerating from lights and whatnot.
It had 2nd row captains chairs and full 3rd row seating that collapsed into the floor quite nicely. Lots of trunk space. With no frame to worry about and lower floor line you can really notice the difference in vertical trunk space. My gf's 11y/o seemed to like it quite a bit as a passenger with more controls for climate and sound in the back.
One feature I really grew accustomed to was the parking assist lines on the back-up camera and the alert when approaching objects. Very helpful- wish I had it but I believe the 2014 4Runners are equipped now.
Another feature the 4Runner really needs is the automatic lift gate. Loved this feature. Button was on the fob and on the lift gate. Miss it already.
I prefer the cruise control buttons on the actual steering wheel with volume/seek controls on the back-side on the steering wheel. Small item but convenient.
Overall, I became used to and quite comfortable driving the Traverse after 600+ miles. I would not buy one over a 4Runner but if there was a big price difference I could consider this cross-over segment. The high end Traverse is priced only a couple grand cheaper than the Limited but they probably offer more incentives. Though it is more practical in terms of space and family comfort, the looks, feel and capability as a driver are not worth it. The 4Runner just feels tighter and more like a tank with better power and interior comforts as a driver. When it comes time for my own kids, however, a cross-over really could make a lot of sense.... for my wife
So the first question I assume I will be asked is , "WHY?" Well I just got back from a 9-day vacation from South Florida and rented from the Fort Lauderdale airport. I don't like driving cars and didn't want to pay for a Yukon or Tahoe so I settled on the standard SUV category which was initially "Jeep Grand Cherokee or similar" then switched to "Hyundai Santa Fe or similar." Would have been cool to try out a JGC but oh well. Anyway, when we went to the the parkade, the guy basically grabbed the first vehicle he saw which was a 2013/2014 AWD Grey Chevrolet Traverse.
Not a bad looking vehicle. Initial observations were that it had lots of room and the driver seat leg room was awkward as my right knee/leg was against the centre console. A few inches wider and longer than the 4Runner. I didn't find it much better in terms of on road handling/driving.
For the overall trip which included a highway journey up to Disney for 2 days it was actually a pretty decent vehicle to drive. MPG wasn't really any better than the 4Runner. Did 75-80mph up the FL Turnpike to Orlando and computer said I got as high as 21.3MPG but by the time I filled up after some Orlando driving the computer was at 19.9 and I calculated 18.9- so off by 1MPG so I may have only been getting low 20s on the highway. Not bad but the 4Runner can easily get that at the same speed so I was sort of surprised.... Especially given the claim that crossovers are more efficient. The Traverse is a 4,700lb vehicle though. Power was decent but I noticed it hit higher RPMM's when accelerating from lights and whatnot.
It had 2nd row captains chairs and full 3rd row seating that collapsed into the floor quite nicely. Lots of trunk space. With no frame to worry about and lower floor line you can really notice the difference in vertical trunk space. My gf's 11y/o seemed to like it quite a bit as a passenger with more controls for climate and sound in the back.
One feature I really grew accustomed to was the parking assist lines on the back-up camera and the alert when approaching objects. Very helpful- wish I had it but I believe the 2014 4Runners are equipped now.
Another feature the 4Runner really needs is the automatic lift gate. Loved this feature. Button was on the fob and on the lift gate. Miss it already.
I prefer the cruise control buttons on the actual steering wheel with volume/seek controls on the back-side on the steering wheel. Small item but convenient.
Overall, I became used to and quite comfortable driving the Traverse after 600+ miles. I would not buy one over a 4Runner but if there was a big price difference I could consider this cross-over segment. The high end Traverse is priced only a couple grand cheaper than the Limited but they probably offer more incentives. Though it is more practical in terms of space and family comfort, the looks, feel and capability as a driver are not worth it. The 4Runner just feels tighter and more like a tank with better power and interior comforts as a driver. When it comes time for my own kids, however, a cross-over really could make a lot of sense.... for my wife
Last edited: