If you HAD to Vote for One...

[wadle5]

I think I am following your line of thought but I don't make a connection to this topic.

Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk

How does it not. It pertains directly to the presidential campaign currently in the running and in this poll? While the legal system used to be full up upstanding individuals it is now not necessarily about what you can prove, but what the other defendant CANT prove. It has moved from ethics and logic and has gone downhill. She is and will continue to be a person with poor judgement, poor ethics, and extremely egotistical. . . . there are good lawyers and then there are horrible people. She is one of those two. A lawyers job to fight for their client in the most ethical way, what she did was not. Although "legal" whatever that means these days she didn't go about it in the most amicable way.

 

[jeremyc74]

I only have one observation. You can instantly tell by the poll numbers that this forum is predominantly male, and white.

 

[ThorInc]

I only have one observation. You can instantly tell by the poll numbers that this forum is predominantly male, and white.

Lol, I think you are spot on!

 

[ndcent]

"Belgium is a beautiful city." - Trump, master of foreign policy.

 

[Nicco61]

Dems looked at Reagan as an actor he didn't work out too bad. If all CEO's were merely representatives/face of their businesses you wouldn't have, Apple, GE etc.

 

[BrianSD_42]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...42ddd2-34dd-11e6-8758-d58e76e11b12_story.html

The GOP’s Senate majority is at risk. Republicans hope they can insulate vulnerable Senate incumbents from the Trump effect, but that is no easy task. Only a clean break with the presumptive nominee will give those senators the freedom to campaign on their own. Even the most tepid of endorsements would leave them answerable to everything he might say or do over the next four-plus months.

Despite the obvious weaknesses of Clinton as a candidate, her campaign operation is now far better prepared to wage a general-election campaign than is Trump’s. The New York billionaire is looking to outsource many of the mechanics of the campaign to the Republican National Committee. But the fundraising needed to underwrite those operations has been slow. State Republican parties could find themselves strapped for money in the fall.

 

[3wbdriver]

I will be voting based on the fact that the next president will be responsible for at least 1 and possibly as many as 4 Supreme Court Justice appointments. You can read any inference from that that you may. I'd like to see at least 2 strict Constitutionalists appointed, if such a person still exists........

 

[Joshfl95]

Not pleased with this entire election cycle... but Trump for sure over Hilary, sadly. I was a fan of her years ago but not anymore.

 

[ChristGilley]

I find it a very bad omen that my first voting experience is gonna be to help decide which terrible candidate will become president


Sent while pulling out a Ford

 

[ndcent]

I find it a very bad omen that my first voting experience is gonna be to help decide which terrible candidate will become president


Sent while pulling out a Ford

Don't feel bad. I voted for Bush in 2000.

 

[jwkilgore]

Based on the last few posts, I'm gonna say it again: If everyone who hates both current candidates votes third party, Gary Johnson will win by a landslide.

I encourage you to watch the Libertarian Town Hall tonight on CNN.

 

[hikenbike]

Based on the last few posts, I'm gonna say it again: If everyone who hates both current candidates votes third party, Gary Johnson will win by a landslide.

I encourage you to watch the Libertarian Town Hall tonight on CNN.

Watching now. They have my vote!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Bean#310]

trump over Hilary for sure.

 

[Gunslinger-13]

I'm not a huge fan of trump, but I'd take full blown AIDS over Hilary the Hildabeast Clinton being President.

She is vile, hateful, a liar, a terrible leader, and embroiled in so many illegal activities it is quite sad that there are even 20 folks here who would cast a its for such a terrible reprehensible excuse for a human being.

If you researched what she has done in her career- the lies, the illegal activity and dead bodies in the wake of her decisions- and can got for her- your Nucking futz!

Obama sucked, Bush sucked, Clinton sucked, Bush sucked, and son on and so forth. Reagan was okay. Pretty much the last 100 years has been shit presidents and our choices are vote for a shit sandwhich or a douche.

Biggest reason I'm voting Trump is SCOTUS. Next Pres will get 1 appointment for sure likely 1-2 more.

If Hilary appoints SCOTUS justice- this country will devolve into civil war within 10 years. She will choose ultra ultra leftist progressives that will dismantle the Constitution and bring about a nightmare.

Can't believe anyone would vote Hilary. She's done so much harm to this country already, and you would give her more power? Just ludicrous!

 

[wadle5]

I'm not a huge fan of trump, but I'd take full blown AIDS over Hilary the Hildabeast Clinton being President.



She is vile, hateful, a liar, a terrible leader, and embroiled in so many illegal activities it is quite sad that there are even 20 folks here who would cast a its for such a terrible reprehensible excuse for a human being.



If you researched what she has done in her career- the lies, the illegal activity and dead bodies in the wake of her decisions- and can got for her- your Nucking futz!



Obama sucked, Bush sucked, Clinton sucked, Bush sucked, and son on and so forth. Reagan was okay. Pretty much the last 100 years has been shit presidents and our choices are vote for a shit sandwhich or a douche.



Biggest reason I'm voting Trump is SCOTUS. Next Pres will get 1 appointment for sure likely 1-2 more.



If Hilary appoints SCOTUS justice- this country will devolve into civil war within 10 years. She will choose ultra ultra leftist progressives that will dismantle the Constitution and bring about a nightmare.



Can't believe anyone would vote Hilary. She's done so much harm to this country already, and you would give her more power? Just ludicrous!

Get ready for the pitchforks as some members here think there is only one right answer.

 

[Planetölogy]

Both candidates are flawed and possibly in cahoots. Trump's continued buffoonery gives credence to the theory that he's running a false flag campaign to ensure a Clinton victory. I will be voting for neither. I do see advantages to a Trump presidency:

1) I believe many Trump supporters would prefer he lose so they can continue attacking the establishment rather than supporting him as POTUS. If he wins we're spared the obnoxious "Don't blame me I voted for Trump" justification.

2) Four years of comedy gold!

 

[ndcent]

My current leaning.

 

[ndcent]

Awesome to see Cruz snuff Trump oh the RNC stage.

That's such a better story that some college drop out nude models plagiarism.

 

[ndcent]

Then theres this...

 

[jeremyc74]

Based on the last few posts, I'm gonna say it again: If everyone who hates both current candidates votes third party, Gary Johnson will win by a landslide.

I encourage you to watch the Libertarian Town Hall tonight on CNN.

I'm watching Johnson closely. I think this is the best opportunity in decades for a third party run, but they needed a rock star and I'm not sure Johnson is it. We have the two most unpopular presidential candidates in the history of modern politics, so it's now or never IMO.

It'd be great to have someone in office who believes in the ENTIRE constitution, not just the parts that go well with their parties platform (which both major parties are guilty of right now).

A person ought to be able to marry whoever the hell they want, while toting an AR-15 and smoking a blunt, and the government should have to have a warrant to see their phone records while they're planning it! :biggrin1: