LandCruiser
New member
What you fail to consider is that even a single armed person could totally change the outcome. Instead of 20 people (or in your oddly limited scenario 5) you could end up with fewer injuries or lives taken.
I find it funny that the gun grabbers preach that if new laws save even a single life then they are worth it, but ignores that an armed individual could just as well save a life or lives, probably better than some text on paper.
I wouldn't really waste my time. The far left mentality assumes that anyone who carries a gun has absolutely no idea how to use it since only the police and military actually get the necessary high level training to use one effectively. The lefties believe that a gun is more of a crutch, a satisfying of an inadequacy, and more harm than good in a crisis situation.
They feel that gun laws, gun free zones, and other crap are there to keep some kind of ficticious wild west shootouts happening between criminals and gun-carrying citizens.