Most comparable aftermarket springs to the tall '99 springs??

[FLYNAVY53]

I've got a 2002 SR5 with 248K miles and sagging springs. Id like to go with the tall '99 springs but obviously finding a set of new OEM units is near impossible and prohibitively expensive.

Are there any aftermarket options that will give me the same minimal lift and factory ride quality? This truck is my daily driver, and doesnt see a lot of weight in the back so I'm not looking for something super tall or stiff.

Thanks for the help!

 

[shadow247]

What is your hub to fender measurement? 5th Gen Rear springs work and gave me 23.5 on the rear with a 200 lb sub box...

 

[the_welfare_wagon]

I might be wrong but I believe that Moog 81088 springs are their version of the 99 talls. Pretty cheap on rock auto

 

[Drew76]

I might be wrong but I believe that Moog 81088 springs are their version of the 99 talls. Pretty cheap on rock auto

Those 81088 are for the fronts, Moog rears are 81041, I had them on for last 5 years with 1.5" spacers on my 2000 Limited, did have the drivers side lean. Hub to Fender was 22.5" driver, close to 23" passenger.

 

[phattyduck]

What is your hub to fender measurement? 5th Gen Rear springs work and gave me 23.5 on the rear with a 200 lb sub box...

Are you sure? The '14 4Runner springs I have on the rear of mine with 10mm trim packers on both and I'm at 22" in the back. These are the OEM 5th gen springs from a good friend of mine...

-Charlie

 

[Spiker Engineering]

Are you sure? The '14 4Runner springs I have on the rear of mine with 10mm trim packers on both and I'm at 22" in the back. These are the OEM 5th gen springs from a good friend of mine...

-Charlie

I'm skeptical too. I had 5th Gen rear springs in my '97 and ended up with a 23" hub to flare - and that's with a 1" BL, and no extra weight in the back. I'd be surprised at anything above 22" with those springs.