limamike
New member
Thanks pawzitiv, I appreciate the quick response (and don't suppose you're in the market to sell your RRO?):thanks:
Now, for something a bit more, on topic. Has anyone out there compared driving with the rotopax on the roof vs having them mounted lower in the vehicle (either in the cargo area, or on a rear tire mount)?
Since water/fuel are so dense, I'm curious if there is a noticeable difference between having that weight so high, versus keeping it closer to the center of gravity.
Thanks!
I can't imagine it'll make that much of a difference for so little fuel/water. Regular unleaded gas is what, 6.x lbs per gallon? Water is 8.3. So, let's say you're carrying 8 gallons of water on your roof with a weight of ~67 lbs. While I haven't carried liquids at that weight on my roof, I carried close to the same weight in a Storm case (which has a smaller footprint than 2x2 gallon Rotopax or 1x4 gallon Rotopax) from Washington DC to Glacier National Park and back without any issue at all. If the Rotopax are full then you shouldn't have too much shifting around either.