Re: Re: 2WD 4Runner
RXvedub said:where you lacated, I have a set left, brand new [/QUOTE
Northern California
RXvedub said:where you lacated, I have a set left, brand new [/QUOTE
Northern California
Atomic 4Runner said:If the traction coefficient is the same for chains on either axle, why not put the chains on the back so you'll feel a lot less vibration?
One other reason: normally the power distribution is 60% Rear /40% Front, and with front wheel spin you get 71% power delivered to the rear axle. If the rear axle spins, the power distribution is 53% Front / 47% rear.
Bottom line: If you're going to have one axle slipping due to no chains, the greatest efficiency can be had with the chains placed on the rear axle. (Sorry for the boring math lesson.) Can you tell I've worked for the govt. too long?
Atomic 4Runner said:If the traction coefficient is the same for chains on either axle, why not put the chains on the back so you'll feel a lot less vibration?
One other reason: normally the power distribution is 60% Rear /40% Front, and with front wheel spin you get 71% power delivered to the rear axle. If the rear axle spins, the power distribution is 53% Front / 47% rear.
Bottom line: If you're going to have one axle slipping due to no chains, the greatest efficiency can be had with the chains placed on the rear axle. (Sorry for the boring math lesson.) Can you tell I've worked for the govt. too long?
RBLACAUSA said:I bought these...Super Z LT
from Pep Boys last year. Haven't used them, but after doing the homework they seem to be the best ones for the Runner. Use 'em on the rear tires only as I don't think there's enough clearance on the front.
Luxury said:I loved the Super Z LT because they were so easy to install. I did drive on some roads that were very scrapped for probably the same 3 miles or so, and mine didn't break. I'd even consider buying them again if they break because the install was so effortless. BTW, I posted pics of them in the thread linked in my signature.