I agree. What about the gas tank recall on my Ford truck that could cause it to explode into flames?
The only good news source in this country is NPR. ABC isn't bad. Fox is the worst, followed by the rest.
I just heard FORD has issues with their Hybrid Models..something to do with Brake Regeneration as well. STRANGE it didn't make it as "Breaking News" on fox or CNN.
Gas tank? What gas Tank? Ford can do no wrong. It's 100% American! Bullet Proof! You're full of it man! *wink*
Wait...lets not get too far ahead now...didn't the media rip Ford for the Bridgestone rollove ordeal??
The Prius brake problem has everything to do with actual brake performance...or lack of!
.
Gas tank? What gas Tank? Ford can do no wrong. It's 100% American! Bullet Proof! You're full of it man! *wink*
Oh yes, and we can also go waaaaay back earlier in time and bring up the FACT that Ford knowingly continued to produce the Pinto with a design flaw that also caused the car to burst into flames in a rear end collision.
I don't know if anyone here is old enough to remember or perhaps researched that whole mess, but it was proven by internal Ford documents that Ford knew about the problem and made a financial decision to continue producing and selling the faulty Pintos because it would be less expensive to pay for the lawsuits that result from deaths than it would be to recall all of the Pintos on the roads at the time.
Makes you wonder, huh?
That's true. Most "news" today has really become sensationalistic story telling about things that happen around us. Accurate reporting is no fun if it takes the edge off the story. Some outlets don't even pretend to be impartial anymore; their political bias one way or the other can be very obvious.
Have you noticed how the term "breaking news" now seems to mean anything that has happened in the last couple of days, despite the fact that we have round-the-clock, instant access to news through tons of TV channels and the Internet? The term still grabs your attention, but usually only long enough to find that it's old news and you move on.
Toyota has to confront these issues directly in order to get past them. Unfair as it is, Toyota is still a foreign car to many people in the U.S. (Don't mention the fact that the only stock car represented by NASCAR that's assembled in the U.S. is the Camry!) That means that Toyota's image can bad that much faster because people won't give them the benefit of the doubt.
Wasn't that firestone and the explore? just making sure.
That's not entirely accurate. If you research the problem with the 2010 Prius, you'll find that the real problem is with the ABS system, not the actual braking performnce of the vehicle under normal circumstances. In other words, the braking performance of the car is fine, the only complaints are when the car is braking hard on a bumpy road (of course this condition would kick in the ABS) or braking hard on a low friction surface like snow/ice.
Of course the mainstream media omits that kind of detail, so the average Joe thinks that the Prius has brakes that can fail, when the truth is that only the ABS peformance has been identified as a potential problem.
My brother has '10 Prius. The brakes (ABS/electronic brakes) have a delay when you brake over a bump...THUS, IT IS AN ACTUAL BRAKE PERFORMANCE ISSUE!! For that split second over the bump, YOU HAVE NO FREAKING BRAKES! ZIPO, NADA, NONE, ZERO. There is no "potential" problem...IT IS A FREAKING KNOWN PROBLEM. Toyota has fixed this brake problem via software update on the newer Prius.
A modern car should have adequate brakes REGARDLESS of road conditions. How can you dismiss this Prius brake problem simply because on normal, flat roads, it is ok????? I don't get it. Huh?
Wasn't that firestone and the explore? just making sure.
Oh yeah, the fact that THERE IS A DEFINITIVE FIX to the Prius brake problem AND Mr. Toyoda admitting that IT IS A PROBLEM make it pretty darn clear that THERE IS FREAKING PROBLEM!![]()