All of that besides maybe the Nav issue points to a lack of research. I mean the mpg is notoriously bad, it’s a body on frame truck (KDSS helps), and it’s a relatively old, none SC/Turbo’d V6 mated to a 5 speed transmission.
But if you want to feel better about the purchase, you can drive my old 98 Explorer Sport for a few days. There is no nav, the radio doesn’t light up (you have to wait for a commercial to know what station your on), somehow it feels even more body on frame, it has 60ish less hp, and it has worse mpg and a smaller fuel tank.
Your 4Runner will feel like a Range Rover after that.
I heard the mpg sucked and people were complaining about the power, but I also have the same powertrain in a tacoma, so I figured people were just over exaggerating the issues, as the power feels fine in my taco... The 4runner we bought, we found in flagstaff, which is a lot higher in elevation than phoenix (where I live), so while I did notice the power difference, I chalked some of it up to the altitude. I didn't realize it would be THAT much worse in power than the tacoma, and get worse mpg too.
I bought it used, so I missed most of the stuff I'm complaining about on the test drive, because I was kinda preoccupied with listening for odd noises, and making sure everything worked, ect.
It wasn't until I really started driving it, that these became annoying.. I mean, why isn't there a carseat tether on the 3rd row seats?! lol
I was kind of also under a time crunch to buy it, as I had a full price offer on my car I was selling, plus the 4runner was a really good deal.
Other than the GX, the 4runner is basically in a class by itself for its offload capability and reliability, so even if I knew all of this, I would have probably still went with it. It just kinda sucks, that these are even issues with everything else that's out, and the price point the 4runner is at.
I guess I'm just venting. Thanks for listening. haha.