Why not 255/85/16?

Dous

New member
So I am still waiting on getting tires, finally getting settled in college...but I am pretty sure I have made my choice

255/85/16 BFG KM2's

The Toyo M/T is also on my mind

My question though, is why don't more people run this size?

Pro's
-Less rolling resistance (narrower)
-Less weight
-Lower cost (BFG is 35 cheaper per tire, equates to 140 cheaper)
-Better on rocks and other rugged terrain off road
-Better MPG
-IMO the 285 looks too wide on these narrow SUV's
-Taller, a TRUE 33. The Toyo MT run 33.5, BFG 33.3.

Con's
-Cuts through deep mud/snow instead of floating
-Slightly less stable on off camber situations
-Usually less sidewall deflection
-Fewer manufacturers for the size
 
Register to hide this ad
Good choice on a tire. I think more people should run 255's more especially with our 4runner since they are underpowered. I wish more manufactures made the size though especially in an all terrain.
 
I used to run those size KM2's and they were amazing in everything I put them in. Loved them and would purchase again. They are a very popular size for DRW trucks.
 
I think the 33x12.5 and 285/75s are more common because most tire buyers like the look of their tires sticking out.

I agree with you, I'd like to see more tires in the 10.5 range. My 255/85 KM2s are in the mail. :D
 
Here's a 3rd gen with 255 Maxxis Bighorns. I think they look really good

5532984738_f34968f91d_b.jpg~original

5532984754_2ff970b4b1_b.jpg~original
 
I have the same problem with those as I do with the Duratracs, though - I wish the tread didn't tail off halfway down the sidewall. It's a shallow thing, I know, Bighorns are awesome tires. I just don't like the look.
 
They should have less rubbing issues too. They should clear the UCAs without any problems. Being narrower, they should rub less on the pinchweld too.
 
More aggressive sidewall is better off road though...

Depends on how far down the sidewall you go, though. I get rolling the lugs off the edge and staggering them, that's good function. But extending a shallow replication of the the pattern halfway towards the rim doesn't buy you anything - that's fashion, and I'm not a fan.
 
Same lift- trim requirments as 285/75/16s?

Or does the increased height and narrower profile require less or more lift and trimming then a 285/75/16? :fro:
 
Last edited:
I have the same problem with those as I do with the Duratracs, though - I wish the tread didn't tail off halfway down the sidewall. It's a shallow thing, I know, Bighorns are awesome tires. I just don't like the look.

Thats why I love the km2, looks super clean, no dumb sidewall crap
 
I love that tire size!!

I have 255/85 Cooper Discoverer ST and very happy!!

With 255/85 the drivetrain suffer much less ( cvs, steering wheel, etc ), the rig feels lighter, lighter drivetrain, etc.

Dous, you'll never regret having them!!

Note: I think 255/85 Toyo is the tallest tires of all brands ( in 255/85 of course ) and I also think they wear faster than km2.

Cheers
 
Last edited:
I'll probably consider them next time I need new tires. I think the extra diameter looks nice, and like you mentioned, I like the idea of it fitting more naturally (and cheaper to boot!).
 
I'm in the market for tires and like the pizza cutter look as well. What kind of lift is needed to get these to fit?
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
278,309
Messages
3,554,071
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top