I am late to the market for some studded winter tires for my 2004 4Runner SR5 V8.
I really like the Nokian Hakka 8 in the 16 inch (265/70R16), but there is no stock left in Canada. There are 17 inch tires available (265/65R16). Unfortunately my existing winters are on 16" rims, so I would need to buy new rims.
Any thoughts on running 17 inch vs 16 inch in terms of traction, ride, handling and pothole dangers?
Other option would be to wait until next fall. Even the Pirelli Winter Ice Zero is only available in 17" in a suitable size.
The Nokian LT2 available in 16", but it seems to be older technology with fewer studs, and I wonder if a 10 ply LT2 is overkill. Does anyone have experience with the Nokian Hakka 8 studded vs Nokian LT2 studded?
I am restricting my choices to factory studded tires.
Thanks in advance for your advice!
Greg
I really like the Nokian Hakka 8 in the 16 inch (265/70R16), but there is no stock left in Canada. There are 17 inch tires available (265/65R16). Unfortunately my existing winters are on 16" rims, so I would need to buy new rims.
Any thoughts on running 17 inch vs 16 inch in terms of traction, ride, handling and pothole dangers?
Other option would be to wait until next fall. Even the Pirelli Winter Ice Zero is only available in 17" in a suitable size.
The Nokian LT2 available in 16", but it seems to be older technology with fewer studs, and I wonder if a 10 ply LT2 is overkill. Does anyone have experience with the Nokian Hakka 8 studded vs Nokian LT2 studded?
I am restricting my choices to factory studded tires.
Thanks in advance for your advice!
Greg