JohnnyT
New member
JohnnyT, hahaha, nice. Well, my "snot" (aka my 6 mo. old newborn) woke up early and decided to wake me too.![]()
Are you impressed that I know what CCW is?? Learned that from you.
Are you proud of me?
JohnnyT, hahaha, nice. Well, my "snot" (aka my 6 mo. old newborn) woke up early and decided to wake me too.![]()
Are you impressed that I know what CCW is?? Learned that from you.
Are you proud of me?
And I'm disappointed at your lack of commentary on my voting record response yesterday. I'm actually looking forward to it.
Ok...yet, we spend a ton of effort and media coverage to ban the word "Easter" or "Christmas" from schools. And we go out of our ways to promote this "Morning after pill" to all ages because we are perfectly OK & accepting with sex at any age...as a safety net. Is our society got our priorities screwed up?
Logically and realistically you are correct. Here's the deal though: We have this document called the Constitution which, to all intents and purposes, is the rule book for our great nation. Good or bad, right or wrong, this is what we have. When the constitution was written, they wanted a separation of church and state, so our government (and lawyers) have thrown common sense out the window in many decisions to try to keep the two apart. There is no amendment for separation of sex and state lol. A lot has changed since that document was written and while I personally think it should continue to be used as the final say there probably needs to be a few more amendments added to reflect change in society as time rolls on.
I am not a medical or psychological guy (dumb engineer) but I will give you my views and maybe it might give a few of you a reason to go "Hmmmm."
Who is to blame for the increasing number of teens having sex? You would think that it has something to do with poor parenting, the changing and degradation of morals, increasingly racier shows on TV or video games and technology but I think it is something much more basic and simple. The answer? Nutrition. Why nutrition? Here you go:
Forget for a moment that girls as young as 12 were having babies back in cave man times. That's too far back and a lot of genetic markers have mutated since then. Let's go back a few hundred years as I consider this to be "modern" times. Right now the average age of a girl's first period is around 12 years old. In the 1800's it was 17 years old. the reason for the huge change is simple nutrition. Today we are much more healthy than they were back then which gives our kids a "jump start" on growth (and reaching puberty) and along with growth comes the changes from child to adult.
So armed with that knowledge you would think that girls would have their first child earlier right? Wrong! In 1970 the average age of a first time mother was 21.3 years old in the US. Now it is 25.4 years old. Yes, the number of teens having babies is increasing but apparently the number of women waiting to have kids until later is increasing at a faster pace. Remember that kids have no desire to have sex until their body changes during puberty. We have made everyone more healthy over the last 100 years or so, which makes girls have their first periods at an earlier age and boys get larger and start puberty earlier and...well, they want to have sex earlier too. I think the increasing age of having their first child going up has to do with birth control more so than anything else.
So what does all this mean? I don't know but I have thought about this subject just a little lol.
Thai, you ignored my question. Do you think education and abstinance would help? In a perfect world that would work, but as we know this isnt a perfect world and teenage girls all over ignore these two things for natural instincts.
Hmmmm....
That's all you got? I at least tried to justify my position with FACT and data while the other posters here... well I will let that one slide. What do you and Thai think about it?
That's all you got? I at least tried to justify my position with FACT and data while the other posters here... well I will let that one slide. What do you and Thai think about it?
I have not done enough reading to give you an educated opinion on it.
Sorry, you lost my respect when you equate snot from your nose to a fetus. I am not all pro-life (kinda in middle), but what you wrote earlier is plain retarded and shows your total lack of understanding. It was rather shocking to read what you wrote and think that it came from someone with a thought process more advance than a tadpole.
Yes, I am sure that SV_DUDE will ban me for saying above... but it needed to be said. Sorry.
So what do you propose, abstinance and education. Thats worked thus far.
If all you can do is discredit me from one stupid remark
If a fetus is considered life then i guess im a murderer for sneezing into a tissue and throwing it out.
WTF?! Seriously, are you a retard?
As for my snot and fetus comment, it was to draw a comparison of the insignifigance of the two. It is not a concious being therefore it shouldnt be seen as murder in some peoples eyes.
Please shut up.