2021 Trail Editions

I think he meant Grand Cherokee. I considered it before pulling the trigger on the 4runner. They are really nice, roughly the same size, and have good off road chops. but I hear many people have catostrophic transmission failures early. When I was test driving at one dealership, I saw three in the repair lot with "transmission dead, will not move" written on the windshield.

That scared me off
Yeah, I figured that's what he meant. I'm not familiar with the differences between the two. I wonder if those transmission failures are on ones with the hot motor. Too much power for the transmission? Drag racing?
 
Sounds like you're looking for a Range Rover Sport? I know JLR absolutely sucks in the reliability department, but RR's are quite capable off-road, and their on road manners are nothing to sneeze at regarding performance.

FWIW, my 2017 4Runner was in the shop about once a month for the 20K miles I owned it (from new) for a variety of issues: strong steering wheel wobble, alignment issues, rear right shock exploding, A/C blower motor loudly vibrating, remote start not working, and one other thing I can't remember.

My 2017 Range Rover Sport has 40K miles on it now, (~25k from me), and has never been to the shop for non-standard maintenance (every 16K miles). It has a SC V8 with 510hp, does 0-60 in 5 seconds, gets about 15mpg city and 19-21mpg highway (both better than my 4Runner) despite having 275/55R20 KO2s, has a big 27.5 gallon fuel tank, and is great off-road. It should do all of those things though considering it was nearly twice the price.

Pretty sure I had a lemon 4Runner and have had the opposite of a lemon RRS, but it's a data point to consider. Most Range Rover issues nowadays are related to the dual-screen infotainment system (freezing, non-responsive, etc. until the vehicle is restarted).
 
Last edited:
My post this morning was my initial reaction after paying sticker to get the "exclusive" AG on our 2020 Pro, which we got first week of October after waiting six months for it to come in. Then I read into this more and realized this is a limited run of 4,000 units across four colors, so maybe 1,000-1,500 extra AGs running around. That's fine, and the Pro is definitely different than the SR5. Looking at what is offered on the new "Trail", (gray TRD Off road wheels, AWD dial from Limited, roof rack, some black trim on grill, rear cargo tray, and a cooler), I'd still have gone with the Pro hands down though I wonder if I can buy an AG cooler separately...
 
It might not sound like it, but I really do agree with you. The 4Runner and the new Tacoma aren't well sorted vehicles in the engine/transmission/gearing department. They need some modernizing and I don't know why Toyota is sitting on their hands for so damn long. The 4.0 and 5AT was pretty great in 2002 when it first hit the show room floors. The 2010 update was pretty nice at the time too.

But here we are now another decade later and you can buy a turbo I6 diesel Tahoe that gets 30mpg and a Rav4 that has 302hp and gets 40mpg. And Toyota's answer for a new version of the 4Runner is painting an SR5 gray and putting a cooler in the back?!? And making a very confusing naming convention. That's just not good enough anymore.

What really bugs me about the 4Runner and esp the Taco is that they are geared high, with a transmission that wants to keep it at the lowest possible RPM (+/- 2K), yet the engines make barely any power in that rpm range. HP/TQ peaks are well over 4k rpm. It's a very mis-matched combo. I saw a dyno chart not too long ago, and at 2k rpm the 4.0 is making about 150h[/150tq. No wonder why it can't pull a modest grade without dropping 2 gears to maintain speed.

Some people have no problem revving the 4R past 4k every time, but that's not my driving style. All of the other vehicles I've owned have had good low end, I'm used to being able to drive with a light foot and let the vehicle shift at 2,500rpm. What makes it worse is how terrible the 4.0 sounds over 3k rpm. Sounds like a blender full of ball bearings.


Back on topic, I wished they'd picked a different name that "Trail". That's almost as bad as Chevy naming their new crossover the "Blazer".

And I'd be pissed if I just bought a new Army green PRO just for the color.
 
As an SR5 owner, I'm smitten with how Toyota was able to troll both Pro and Trail owners in one fell swoop.

You know the Trail owners are saying "Awe shit, that sucks." :sobbing:

And the Pro owners are currently drafting strongly worded letters to Toyota Corporate in order to communicate their butt hurt. :argue:

Toyota will respond with something that in essence says "We give zero fvcks about your feelings. Go ahead and buy a Jeep, b!tch."

To which some will go out and buy Jeeps, but will inevitably come crawling back with their tail between their legs and Toyota will be right there waiting, like a drug dealer with the goods. :spy:
 
Last edited:
I do not necessarily disagree with your statement, especially your closing comment. I do however think that the Cherokee is a substitute for the 4Runner while the Wrangler may be less so. While I believe it is now built on a car body the Cherokee line certainly represents an alternative to the 4Runner especially for those who might consider 2WD 4Runner. In any event, the entrance of the Bronco in the market will certainly impact everyone in the market space if the hype and apparent anticipation in the market extends into robust sales.

I think you mean GRAND Cherokee? It's always been a unibody, btw. It's not necessarily a "car body", in the way a RAV4 is basically an AWD Corolla.

I THINK the current WK2 Grand Cherokee is based on the same platform as the previous gen Mercedes MClass SUV. It's a holdover from when M-B owned Chrysler.

I think the earlier Grands were more of a competitor to the 4R, The first two generations of Grands had solid front axles, and could easily be built to be trail beasts. The current gen has lost some capability by having 4 wheel independent suspension, and all models below the Limited come standard with a single speed t-case, you need to get at least a LTD to get low range.

IMO the fact that they're unibody is immaterial to me. I think for this class of vehicle having a full frame is overrated, it's not like it gives a large towing capacity on the 4Runner, and on a Toyota it's just one more thing to rust out.

A unibody Grand Cherokee can come with a 5.7 V8 and tow up to 7200 lbs, so in towing and power it easily outclasses the 4R. The potential trade-off is reliability and resale.

I had a 97 Grand Cherokee, btw. Had the straight six and was very reliable for the 12 years and 165k that I owned it.
 
... I'd still have gone with the Pro hands down though I wonder if I can buy an AG cooler separately...

I'm guessing a Kong cooler is way better than what is sure to be an overpriced Toyota cooler. I have a couple of Kong coolers, and they are awesome. Made in the US, lifetime guarantee, and hand over fist better than Yeti -- KONG Coolers - Coolers
 

Attachments

  • Kong-50-Cooler-Gorilla-Gray-rt_1024x1024.jpg
    Kong-50-Cooler-Gorilla-Gray-rt_1024x1024.jpg
    30.8 KB · Views: 1,018
  • rps20200206_214227.jpg
    rps20200206_214227.jpg
    102.9 KB · Views: 952
  • rps20200206_214251.jpg
    rps20200206_214251.jpg
    141.7 KB · Views: 930
  • rps20200206_214343.jpg
    rps20200206_214343.jpg
    100 KB · Views: 935
  • rps20200206_214318.jpg
    rps20200206_214318.jpg
    130 KB · Views: 924
LMAO and I'm sure it's pissing off all the Pro bro's :D

I have a Pro and I laughed. He is, for the most part, correct.

The people who seem angriest are the ones who now have to “share” their super special color. Like, wtf, grow the hell up.
 


I'm reading all wheel drive...

Toyota Brings Back Trail Edition for 2021 4Runner, Tacoma, Tundra

All of the trucks are based on the SR5 model and are offered in either rear- or all-wheel-drive models.

from the car and driver web link. I agree that is a big change but it does say AWD not 4WD. Assume Car and Driver knows the difference. Maybe you all are correct? but it says AWD

Official Toyota press release only states 4WD, no mention of AWD in the Trail editions section:

Toyota Rolls Seven 2021 Special Editions Into Chicago Auto Show - Toyota USA Newsroom
 
I'm dubious of Toyota's 4,000 vehicle claim. Remember when Upper Deck claimed they only made a limited number of Ken Griffey, Jr. trading cards? Downfall of the company it was.

I am particularly dubious since finding TRDPRO production #s are very hard to come by. Happy there are < 1,200 Quicksands left and dropping....
 
I'm guessing a Kong cooler is way better than what is sure to be an overpriced Toyota cooler. I have a couple of Kong coolers, and they are awesome. Made in the US, lifetime guarantee, and hand over fist better than Yeti --

So you like your cars made in Japan but for the coolers made in the US is the way to go? ;)
 
It's all good. AG is a great color as is Cement. At least Toyota listened to their customers who wanted more of these colors. Still, they shouldn't hype the specialty colors for the Pro anymore if this is what they are going to do going forward. I guess we shouldn't be surprised since the Tacoma has done this for a while now. It's one of those wish I would have known because it'd be a choice between the SR5 and Pro, which is a significant savings. I still think wife would have went Pro in the end, but it is nice to have the option now for those currently in the market.
 
You are absolutely correct! However, in light of tittle of this thread, "Trail" of 2010-13 years are “original” when it comes to current (5th gen) 4Runners and that what I was referring to.



They had trails in 14-16 as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
They had trails in 14-16 as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He said "original" 14-16 aren't that they are 5.5's, but whatever semantics.

What is a mega-sized crock of sh!t, the 10-16 Trails all had MTS/Crawl/r-locker/KDSS and all the other bells and whistles. The "new" Trails have none of that and come with a fkn cooler? Seriously. Some straight-up marketing bullsh!t right there! :doh:
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,312
Messages
3,554,083
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top