255 or 275 help me decide

f99c72fd56d2baecfdda3b26dfdcd976.jpg
e9bcb4efc5a2f6e1d9a11e7a27966737.jpg
08d5771f19ac643ce0023b8a129102ef.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
f99c72fd56d2baecfdda3b26dfdcd976.jpg
e9bcb4efc5a2f6e1d9a11e7a27966737.jpg
08d5771f19ac643ce0023b8a129102ef.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That looks great. You just made up my mind as far as what the SR5 likely gets in the spring when the snows come off. I have 1" in the front so I am hoping they work fine with plenty of clearance. If not, I am no stranger to massaging things a bit.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
 
I wasn't 100% sold on the 255/75's just due to tread width and the type of driving id do (a bit spirited down the mountains).... so I just went big and did 275/70's. I can tell they weigh a lot more than the C's. No rubbing on my stock '16 TE...at least for normal driving. I'm going to check the flex this weekend. The funny thing, my speedo still reads 1mph faster than the GPS on my phone and separate Garmin. I'll report on MPG changes
 
Ya I was worried I wouldn’t like the width but after we got it mounted we both thought it looked better than the 285 did also I think the 8.5” wheel helps it look a little wider it’s looks so much better in person too.
2a44cd492cff71904ecc29c1a8b9eb1c.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Function over form sometimes. From the side it looks perfect. I'm having a machismo issue with the width of the tire, but then if they perform well, stay tucked and give you the mpg you're after, then you can't complain at all. Nice rig!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,310
Messages
3,554,080
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top