Just a FYI for those curious about 4Runner sales. Projected sales for 2012 using simple projections will be around 50,000. Enjoy!
Sales are 50% of what they were 15 years ago.
Just a FYI for those curious about 4Runner sales. Projected sales for 2012 using simple projections will be around 50,000. Enjoy!
I would like to see those sale's numbers in comparison to gas price hikes.....
*poof*
Sales are 50% of what they were 15 years ago.
The 4th gen 4Runner had MUCH stronger sales during its first three years.
2003: 109,308
2004: 114,212
2005: 103,830
But keep in mind gas prices were also a lot less expensive back then as well.
I don't know if I agree with you there. The Highlander back then is pretty much what it is today, just with a slightly different body style. I don't think the Highlander stole many 4Runner sales back then or today for that matter.
Another thing to consider is that there are very few body-on-frame, true 4wd SUVs available today compared to 10 years ago. Most of them are gone now or turned into "softroaders". If you think about it that way, the 4Runner should have a huge advantage for people who still want to buy a new body-on-frame SUV with a true 4wd system. What's left out there these days? Maybe the Jeep Wrangler & the Nissan Xterra? And I think the Xterra is due to be replaced soon.
That is true, but let's not forget that Toyota has offered the Highlander alongside the 4runner for many years now. Both are mid size SUVs, but one is car based and the other is truck based. If more people choose to buy a car-based SUV, there are many, many choices available to them. However, if one wants a true truck-based midsize SUV, the choices are very limited today, much more so than 10 years ago. If the 4Runner today was competing against the same amount of other truck-based mid-size SUVs from 10 years ago, logic tells us that it's market share would be lower, which obviously means fewer sales. I suspect that Toyota decided to continue with a truck-based 4Runner simply because everyone else is abandoning the segment. There are very few players left in this segment today.
I suspect that Toyota decided to continue with a truck-based 4Runner simply because everyone else is abandoning the segment. There are very few players left in this segment today.
I don't know if I agree with you there. The Highlander back then is pretty much what it is today, just with a slightly different body style. I don't think the Highlander stole many 4Runner sales back then or today for that matter.
Another thing to consider is that there are very few body-on-frame, true 4wd SUVs available today compared to 10 years ago. Most of them are gone now or turned into "softroaders". If you think about it that way, the 4Runner should have a huge advantage for people who still want to buy a new body-on-frame SUV with a true 4wd system. What's left out there these days? Maybe the Jeep Wrangler & the Nissan Xterra? And I think the Xterra is due to be replaced soon.
Yes, that's the point I was making. How many BOF midsize SUVs are available today? The Xterra is probably the closest remaing competitor, although its a bit downmarket. The Jeep Grand Cherokee, although unibody, is probably another close competitor, but it's a bit upmarket. This is definitely a niche market these days, not a high volume market at all. That said, I bet the Grand Cherokee is far outselling both the 4Runner and the Xterra.