Anyone running this suspension combo?

CrazyNorwegian

New member
I currently have 5100s up front with stock shocks in the back. I was going to put the 5100s in the back but I also plan on switching the rear springs to ome. I really don't like how the car rights right now with just the 5100s in the front...feels like I don't even have shocks in the back. Now my question is Should I go with ome shocks in the back since I'm going to put in ome springs? I've read the ome shock/springs go very well together. Or will the fact that I have 5100s in the front and ome in the back make the car drive weird.
 
Register to hide this ad
I ran 5100's (OME 880 springs) on a 2003 Tacoma... Did not like them at all and ended up switching to the full OME suspension kit for the Tacoma. After that I decided to run OME for future lifts or suspension replacements on my 4WD's.

OME on the 4R will maintain the factory rake though.
 
I ran 5100's (OME 880 springs) on a 2003 Tacoma... Did not like them at all and ended up switching to the full OME suspension kit for the Tacoma. After that I decided to run OME for future lifts or suspension replacements on my 4WD's.

OME on the 4R will maintain the factory rake though.

How stiff are the ome shocks compared to the 5100's. I just don't want the back end to be looser the the front like it is now. Feels like the back end of the car is twerking more then miley cyrus in stop and go traffic with the stock shocks
 
How stiff are the ome shocks compared to the 5100's. I just don't want the back end to be looser the the front like it is now. Feels like the back end of the car is twerking more then miley cyrus in stop and go traffic with the stock shocks

Stiff however, they backend does not "twerk". The shocks and springs on the front react the same as the rear springs and shocks. it's a very solid suspension.
 
Stiff however, they backend does not "twerk". The shocks and springs on the front react the same as the rear springs and shocks. it's a very solid suspension.

It's a bit difficult to compare bilsteins on a Tacoma with rear leaf springs and a bed vs. a 4runner with coils and a passenger compartment. The 4r will inherently ride softer than the Tacoma.
 
OP, I just helped [MENTION=100172]Jim82[/MENTION] install the exact setup you are referring to (Bilstein 5100's in the front set to 2.5" and Bilstein 5100's/OME 895E's in the rear. He is happy with the setup so far. Maybe he will chime in to give his input after having this setup for a couple months now.
 
[MENTION=102715]CrazyNorwegian[/MENTION] knowing what I know now, and if I were to do it over again, I would go with my current setup again. I love the height, the ride, the stiffness, the handling, cornering and response. I feel more connected with the vehicle and far more in control. I experienced that "floaty" feeling people have referred to, before the lift, on highway speeds, and if i'm honest, after the lift, too, but not as severe. However, the wheel spacers seemed to have cleared that up. I know that setting the caster to 4+ will make even more difference, but, I have stock UCA and unable to achieve that with the lift.

I don't do any hardcore off roading at all, but I spend a good amount of time on Forest Service roads 5-7k feet up in the mountains of the PNW. I wanted a setup that gave me more confidence in handling, not to say I was unable to to handle the truck with stock suspension. But, I want to be able to read the road and terrain through the bumps and road conditions so I can better respond. I believe the Bilsteins provide that.

For the same reason I enjoy the OME rear springs. I used the information below, which I believe I got from another user on t4r.org, but don't remember the original post:
Stock oem springs are 180lbs
SAW 1.5" lift 213lbs, 18% stiffer than stock
OME 895E 2" lift 260 lbs 44% stiffer than stock
OME 895 2.5" lift 260 lbs 44% stiffer than stock
OME 889 3" lift 260 lbs 44% stiffer than stock
Superflex 2.5" lift 218 lbs 21% stiffer than stock

I went with the 895E, because i wanted it to be stiffer than stock; though, all springs listed are stiffer. I know there are a few guys on here running the SAW with the Bilsteins, and seem to be very happy and there are many of us running the Bilsteins w/OME rear springs. I went with the "E" because I did not want over 2in in lift.

My guess is most people are fairly happy with their setups and hopefully did enough research prior to, to make an informed decision. One that they may or may not regret based on a change in their needs. If I was not happy with mine I'd pull it and start over.

Get the best setup for the money you want to spend. I think it was Socaltrail who was just challenging people to ride in his 4Runner, and was giving a rave review on the Icon. Not sure if it was Stage 1 or one of the many others. But, seems he's just as happy as I am, because his setup fits his needs perfectly.

All the research that led up to helping jbstrd install my lift, I read that it's better to replace all four corners with the same shock. So you're riding stiff in the front and mushy in the rear. That sounds like a bad combo. I'd personally be more concerned with getting my shocks on the same page before the rear springs. But, seems you're on top of that already.

Also, I quite literally read all 100+ pages of this. I wanted to know what people were running and the pros and cons with their choices. I suggest you do the same.

Hope this provides some kind of insight on the combo you're looking at.
 
I would do the SAW springs and 5100's in the rear unless you tow a lot or carry 200lbs in the rear often. [MENTION=65614]Antman[/MENTION] has that setup and looks great. Most OME stuff is meant to be used as a system and not really mismatched.

Here is some of my research from a few years ago on OME stuff. http://www.toyota-4runner.org/5th-gen-t4rs/86509-info-ome-lifts.html

Also I have OME 884 w/ 90010 struts and toytec superflex w/ OME 60020s waiting to go on my rig here in a couple weeks.
 
Last edited:
I would do the SAW springs and 5100's in the rear unless you tow a lot or carry 200lbs in the rear often. [MENTION=65614]Antman[/MENTION] has that setup and looks great. Most OME stuff is meant to be used as a system and not really mismatched.

Thanks Jordan!

I do love the SAW springs with the 5100's, and I tow A LOT and have probably at least 100# of stuff in the back with my new storage box... (I have the airbags as well, but it doesn't sag enough with my boat attached to require filling them past the 7 PSI I run in them daily -basically nothing).

The nice thing about the SAW springs is they provide a nice compliant ride, while still being stiffer than stock, but take all the side-to-side Sway A Way (get it?). They work great...

My .02 :yo:
 
Wow, I didn't expect such a great response out of my question. Thank you everyone who responded. It seems most people are happy with the bilsteins on any setup, so that may be what I'll do. I'm also leaning towards the saw springs now instead of ome. Again thanks for all the responses and info.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,310
Messages
3,554,080
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top