Higher load floor to accommodate batteries.
Rumors that they are axing the 4 runner so they can concentrate on the new LC priced at $55k…..
I'm speculating here, but I would imagine that the base Lexus GX with the hybrid comes in 10k higher than the 1958. If the MPG on the hybrid comes in at 22-23, that might be compelling enough for someone interested in the utilitarian offering of the 1958.
BUT, if you can get that engine in a 4Runner?
I think they're going to have to make the 4Runner more compact than the GX/Landcruiser offering, to differentiate it.
Does the 4Runner still come out of Tahara?
Higher load floor to accommodate batteries.
I'm speculating here, but I would imagine that the base Lexus GX with the hybrid comes in 10k higher than the 1958. If the MPG on the hybrid comes in at 22-23, that might be compelling enough for someone interested in the utilitarian offering of the 1958.
BUT, if you can get that engine in a 4Runner?
I think they're going to have to make the 4Runner more compact than the GX/Landcruiser offering, to differentiate it.
Does the 4Runner still come out of Tahara?
I'm having a hard time understanding how Toyota is positioning the Land Cruiser, it slots above the 4Runner to be the premium BOF for Toyota yet there is no mention of X-REAS or any Adaptive Suspension, either basic or premium.
Did I miss it among the multitude of reviews?