atomic punk
New member
Awful.
The visible signs of wear at only 25k is downright awful.
The visible signs of wear at only 25k is downright awful.
I am with you guys, I don't know what the problem is. I have driven mine for 2+ years in everything from heavy rain to heavy snow coming down on highways in upstate New York to 12+ inches in NJ and MD with none of the problems reported. No traction problems at all (I have the 4WD V-8). I have towed a boat and pulled it up a ramp w/o traction problems.sharp4runr said:Yup, I too must not be flogging my 4Runner enough![]()
Lone Ranger said:I am with you guys, I don't know what the problem is. I have driven mine for 2+ years in everything from heavy rain to heavy snow coming down on highways in upstate New York to 12+ inches in NJ and MD with none of the problems reported. No traction problems at all (I have the 4WD V-8). I have towed a boat and pulled it up a ramp w/o traction problems.
I don't doubt that you can get better tires, but the Dunlops are not particularly bad tires and not something you should be getting rid of at 5 or 10K miles for no other reason than some postings on the Internet. I wouldn't necessarily buy them as replacement tires, but I wouldn't toss them out prematurely either if you already have them on a truck.
I think there is a bit of unsupportable feeding frenzy or piling on going on here - someone posts something negative, and suddenly everyone is a critic. I don't mean to criticize the posters or start a flame war, but I wonder how many were doing things that would cause any tire to break loose?
Kmvreter said:I'm just driving normal. Like noted above, these Dunflops have deteriorated over time. The first sign of pulling into traffic with a little pep in wet conditions (lots of that this year) and they want to break loose. I throw her into 4x4 and away I go. You may not notice this if you have a V8 with fulltime 4wd. They aren't dangerous but I shouldn't have to use the good capabilities of the truck to compensate for the poor traction of the tires.
atomic punk said:My stock Dunlops are balanced, rotated, and the T4R's front end is aligned according to schedule. And I travel 97.4% on road. So it's nothing that "I" am doing to cause them to prematurely wear. It's a negative bandwagon thing at all - especially when it comes to treadlife. Treadlife is not subjective, it's objective. A drunken village idiot can look at tires and see if there is tread or no tread.
Alot of people think the stock tires are bad, alot of people think they are good. That lends me to believe that the Dunlops' reliability is not repeatable, and that anyone purchasing a set is just gambling that they will be happy with them. Meanwhile, when I hear and read (from multiple sources) that 9 out of every 10 people with Revos or Michellens LOVE their tires, I'm more inclined to spend that extra money on those, knowing that my chances of being happy with them are WAY better.
(steps down off box)
tomhaney1 said:... There's an old saying that there are two things you should never comprimise on- shoes and tires.
atomic punk said:3 things....
and #3 is a good education, never comprOmise on that! j/k
![]()
tomhaney1:
I meant to speak only of the reliability of the workmanship and quality of these particular stock tires, not Dunlop in general. I hear ya - I had a set of Dunlop Radial Rover A/Ts on my jeep a few years back and I was happy with them. Since they were way less expensive than BFG & Michelin, I had to take it for what they were worth, and they proved to be a good value for the $$.
nyc4runnin said:im guessing that all the people that have the dunflops have sport editions ???? :awais:
nyc4runnin said:im guessing that all the people that have the dunflops have sport editions ???? :awais: