When I got the pressure to buy
an extended warranty at Toyota, I told the salesman, "Are you saying that this Toyota is such a POS that I need an extended warranty? man, I better cancel this deal and check out the Hondas down the street." That stop the salesman in his tracks and left him flapping his gums with no sounds coming out.
Actually I have never purchased an extended warranty and here's why. Like all insurance policies, it is a gamble, a calculated risk. You are not really buying a 100,000 warranty. You are buying a 64,000-40,000 mile warranty. Toyota has a 3/36,000 bumper to bumper, and a 60/60,000 for engine and drivetrain, so you are paying lots of money for the balance of the 100,000 miles.
If something goes wrong, it normally goes wrong within 15,000-25,000 miles. If the car was made right, and it does not conk out within that time, it would normally run pretty well for the next 85,000-100,000 before it just plain old wears out. Wear and tear is not covered by waranties. Only DEFECTS. SO when a part just pains wears out, you're SOL.
If you do need work for something between the factory warranty and the extended warranty period, will it cost as much as you paid for the warranty? The cost has to greatly exceed the price of the warranty to make it worthwhile as you probably slapped the cost of the warranty onto the price of the car and financed it so you're paying price of warranty plus interest....so what could go wrong that would cost $1,100-$1,900+ to repair in that time frame? Dodge, Ford, Chevy, I would say yes, that is a higher risk. Toyota, I think, is minimal risk.
So far, having owned 2 new VWs, one used Volvo, new Ford Mustang--that went into the shop about a dozen times under warranty, but still ran OK until 125,000 miles, Chevy Tahoe--that went into the shop about 1/2 dozen times under warranty, but no problems till 140,000 miles and still runs at 270,000 miles, and this 4Runner, I have yet to lose on my gamble.