Don't mean to offend but I hate the 5th gen body style

I don't really like the body style, but over time it will grow on me/people. What I don't like is how cheaply made it feels compared to the 4th Gen and then both compared to the previous generations.

I was honestly hoping the 5th Gen was going to look like a 200-Series Land Cruiser. It's somewhat strange that Toyota strayed so far from the design of their other trucks/SUVs. Call me a wuss, but I like the look of the current LC and Highlander a lot.

Family member works at a Toyota dealer, she says they don't sell very many 5th Gen 4Runners and when they do, it's typically to a female mother. The used 4th Gens go QUICK.

Still would be super happy if Toyota would offer a base Land Cruiser w/ leather as an option and none of the other gizmos.
 
When I first saw them I thought...man toyota really has effed up. The stock tires and ugly wheels just killed it. Not to mention from behind they reminded me of a bus. Then I became a member of this forum and seen what people have been doing with them and they definitely have grown on me a lot! I still love the "flow" of the lines on the 4th gen better but when a 5th gen is equippped...they look really good and I'd darn sure drive one!
 
i don;t like the antenna. that i dont get. i heard it was cause of the tsunami. toyota cut cost.....
 
I don't know about everyone else, but I cannot stand the 5th generation Transformer looking 5th generation body style of the 4Runner. Does anyone know why Toyota changed it so radically?

Don't understand why car companies decide to make such a big change when they have a good thing going for them.

I felt the same way when they moved from the 3rd gen. The 4th gen had to grow on me but the 5th looks great imo.

I guess to each their own
 
I'd have to test drive one before I put the nail in the "I ain't gonna have a 5th gen" coffin. Maybe I'll do that next week just for $hits & giggles. I've already driven the 2012 Highlander. I like the looks and features, but even with my 95% on-road driving, I couldn't stand it. FWD bias and it just felt long, narrow & unsteady.
 
Here is my take on it: the 5th gen looks tough but the 4th gen looks sexy. Either way, I like both. As for 3rd gen and under, great looking trucks but they definitely look dated.
 
4th gen.

The 5th does look too boxy, it's too expensive to be sporting that antenna, the height is nice, but where is the V8 option?

A viable upgrade option for me is the Lexus GX470, but at that price point you don't take it off-roading nor abuse it like you would a 4Runner.

So what are the plusses? It's higher than a stock 4Runner, much like a lifted 4th gen.

Anything else, anything else that makes the 5th gen shine over a comparable 4th?
 
4th gen.

The 5th does look too boxy, it's too expensive to be sporting that antenna, the height is nice, but where is the V8 option?

A viable upgrade option for me is the Lexus GX470, but at that price point you don't take it off-roading nor abuse it like you would a 4Runner.

So what are the plusses? It's higher than a stock 4Runner, much like a lifted 4th gen.

Anything else, anything else that makes the 5th gen shine over a comparable 4th?

IMO (admittedly biased), no. About the only thing I can think of is that the non-limited 5th gens at least have a lever for the T-case (but then again, if that lever just activates an electric servo that shifts the T-case, it's no more reliable than the 4th gens electric dial selector.) I do miss the J-shifter on my 3rd gen, at least with that I always knew I could get it into and out of 4wd, no matter what.

I honestly think that the business office at Toyota realized that the 4th gens offered too much for their price point and their fear was that it was cannibalizing sales from the more expensive LC100 and Lexus line of vehicles. So, I think they made a deliberate choice to "de-content" the 5th gen to move it "down market" so it would not compete with the more "luxury" vehicles Toyota sells.

I also wonder if they made the 5th gen a bit more "off road" friendly because they wanted to dump the FJC and figured they needed a more rugged vehicle to fill that niche.

As others have said, a lifted 5th gen with big tires looks pretty good, but with stock tires they jus look weird, like a hippo on roller skates.
 
What I hate about the 5th gen is the "high beltline." This trend started a few years ago with the Chrysler 300 and it's just gotten worse. It makes vehicles look fat because the lower body is huge and the 'greenhouse' (i.e., the part with the windows) is much smaller.

To me it makes cars look like they are in a comic book or cartoon.

Now, having said that, one thing about 4runners is that with factory-sized wheels and tires, they look odd. I guess Toyota must have realized that a lot of people put bigger tires on, so they make the fender wells extra large. Which is fine, but if the owners keep the stock, small wheels, they just look weird.

I saw a 3rd gen yesterday with stock sized wheels and even it looked odd to me, whereas a 3rd gen with a nice, slightly oversized wheel/tire combo looks awesome.

And I've noticed the same thing with the 5th gens. The ones with stock sized wheels look terrible (especially the limiteds with their hideous 20 inch "wagon wheels." Seriously, that's marginally OK on a car but on an SUV it just looks awful.)

But put some meatier tires on it and it looks pretty good, especially with a mild lift and an ARB or similar bumper.

I have grown to light the exterior of the 5th Gen, I hated it at first. But over the years its grown on me and after seeing one or two seriously built up rigs with bumpers, tire carriers, lights, ect its got a certain toughness to it that I like.

That being said, the high belt line is something I'm not a fan of. Its the reason I am not interested in the 5th gen as a vehicle (that and the lack of the 4.6L V8) the high belt line shrinks visibility on the vehicle compared to my 4th gen, it also screws up the interior. one thing I love about my 4th gen is that with the seat as low as possible (I like being closer to the center of gravity in my cars) I can comfortably rest my arm on either the armrest or the window sill with the window down. In the 5th gen my arm is a little more than 90 degrees and becomes uncomfortable to do so. The high belt line also moved the position of the window switches and along with the hybrid Tundra/FJ Cruiser interior is just not as comfortable as the 4th Gen.

The 5th gen has some interior pieces and features that I do like (I like the option of a manual shift lever, or even the dial selector with the safety button.) But overall the vehicle is just not as comfortable as my 4th gen and IMHO the 4th Gen is one of the best "curvy" SUVs on the market.
 
I agree. I can't stand it either. How do people even see out of these vehicles? I'm sure little kids in the back seat love looking at door handles instead of the scenery going by.

They're too busy staring at their iDistractions

I used to not like the look of the 4th Gen, then I started shopping for one and it grew on me enough that it's now my favorite. My biggest disappointment with the 5th Gens is no V8. I love my V8!
 
It does look unbalanced with stock tires. I still prefer the V8 4th Gen for all-round use, and the 3rd Gen for serious off-roading (some trails are tight here). I wish they would bring back the V8 option and put the 4.6L in the 5th Gen.
 
Personally, I like the 4th gen styling over the GX470 and 5th gen 4Runners. The only part of the new 4Runner I like is the increased height. We have a GX and 4th gen- GX is kinda ugly in the back.
4th gen>5th gen>GX470- my rankings :)
 
While I dislike the 5th addition, I still give it credit. At least they didn't make is all curvy and crossroad, like many other models out there. It still looks like a truck. I prefer the later 4th generation. I bought a 2003 4runner originally. The start of the first part of the 4th generation, as my wife says, looks like a station wagon. I hate the boxed off wheel wells.
 
i really like the 5th gen's. If they werent priced insane i would have gotten one. I love my 4th gen but really if you put them next to eachother there is mass amounts of similar design qualities just updated.

Also they're a lot bigger inside which helps for a Sasquatch like myself.
 
What's funny to me is that I was driving a 3rd gen and didn't really like the 4th gens until the 5th gen came out. Once the 5th gen came out, the 4th started looking better and better to me.

After a long trip in June, I realized my 3rd gen just wasn't up to the task of towing so it was either get a 4th gen or get something else. Main contenders were Xterra or the 05+ Pathfinder. X-terra was attractive to me only because of the possibility of getting it with a manual tranny, but after looking at them I realized that the MT was the only thing the X had going for it.

The Pathy is actually a very appealing vehicle to me and IMO just as good looking as the 4th gen. As I said above, the main reason I decided against the Pathy was the limited aftermarket, IRS, and lack of a multi-mode T-case.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,317
Messages
3,554,129
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top