shrub1
Member
They are noticeably louder compared to the Nitto RG R/T. For a brand new MT they aren't bad. Definitely on the quieter side. It's a progressive scale from AT, RT, MT. It'll take some time to feel them out in different conditions but I'll be in some mud this weekend and plenty of rain.
Also, something else to consider. The BFG KM3 is not much bigger than the 285 Nitto RG. This is my only real big complaint. If these came in a 305, I'd say that would be closer to the true size of a 295 RG. These aren't as big as my old 295 Nitto RG's that's for sure. Nitto RGs in 295 were 3 mph off on the speedo. These are almost dead on, just like my 285 Nitto RG's. I also had to space out my fenders and make more room for the Nitto RG's in 295. These fit just fine without my spacing I did on the OEM fender.
In this picture you can kind of see the gap between the fender and driver door. I used a longer bolt and a couple of washers to push out the bottom of the fender to create additional clearance for the bigger 295 RG tires.
![]()
Interesting size compassion re 285 RGs. I am ready for new tires and debating 255/80/17 or perhaps the KM3s in 295 to fill out the wheel wells a bit more.
Does the increase in tire size lead to more aggressive CV boot angles?
Are you even able to get a good center hub to fender measurement with those wheels (due to the hub being so inset?).
How much front end lift are you working with?
Last edited: