It’s about emissions not MPGs...
Ethanol helps fuel burn more completely by oxygenating the combustion reaction. Increasing the burn rate produces cleaner emissions.
LOL!!! Making an engine less efficient (as indicated by lower performance and less MPG) doesn't reduce emissions over the long term, as you have to fill up more frequently, thus increasing overall emissions. Methanol is even better at reducing emissions than ethanol, and is cheaper to make. But its performance is so poor in the use of passenger vehicles that it's a no-go.
Like I said, ethanol blended gas being 'environmentally friendly' is a lie, and the use of a major food source hurts not only the vehicle, but hurts the pocketbooks of people by increasing the price of everything. Beef, pork, chicken, corn, and everything that uses gas to be delivered.
As I said, if corn ethanol was a viable alternative, the government wouldn't have to subsidize the industry to keep it in gas.
Even is Brazil, where they use sugarcane instead of corn (which makes more sense, as sugarcane is used only for sweeteners, not animal feed, and doesn't negatively affect prices of of food), the government has to mandate it's use because it's still an economic loser when left to actual market demand.