External Resi Coilovers... Not King, Icon, Fox, SAW, or Radflo

I believe you are both on different subjects. You don't be able to tell if you have progressive or digressive shocks until you run them. The difference is when the piston moves fast. Either they will get stiffer (progressive) or they will soften (digressive) as the piston moves faster.


Project BeerRunner - http://www.toyota-4runner.org/3rd-gen-t4rs/206385-assburns-2000-limited-build-thread.html

Honestly we probably couldn't tell the difference even if we rode in two different set ups. Unless we were doing baja or something.

I believe [MENTION=63487]A.Wilson013[/MENTION] wrode in both set ups and he currently owns ICON. He said he could not tell the difference. Both were smooth when going fast!

I like the rubber bushing/bump stop on the shaft.
 
Honestly we probably couldn't tell the difference even if we rode in two different set ups. Unless we were doing baja or something.

I believe [MENTION=63487]A.Wilson013[/MENTION] wrode in both set ups and he currently owns ICON. He said he could not tell the difference. Both were smooth when going fast!

I like the rubber bushing/bump stop on the shaft.

It's true that I have been unable to tell (feel) the difference between two VERY similar 3rd gen 4Runners, one with Kings, one with Icons. Around town the ride is pretty rough, and on the same stretches of washboarded out, rough dirt roads, they feel the same to me- getting smoother the faster you go, and the faster the piston gets pumping.

Even riding in a long travel 2nd gen Tacoma with King coilovers and shocks I truly felt no difference on the same crappy road. Around town it felt a bit nicer (see also: softer) but once we were bombing down the road over the washboards it felt arguably the same to me. So similar, in fact, that any plans for long travel (for me) went out the door.

I'm of the opinion that unless you're hitting whoops, bumps, and jumps like an Ultra 4 racer, it won't matter.
 
It's true that I have been unable to tell (feel) the difference between two VERY similar 3rd gen 4Runners, one with Kings, one with Icons. Around town the ride is pretty rough, and on the same stretches of washboarded out, rough dirt roads, they feel the same to me- getting smoother the faster you go, and the faster the piston gets pumping.



Even riding in a long travel 2nd gen Tacoma with King coilovers and shocks I truly felt no difference on the same crappy road. Around town it felt a bit nicer (see also: softer) but once we were bombing down the road over the washboards it felt arguably the same to me. So similar, in fact, that any plans for long travel (for me) went out the door.



I'm of the opinion that unless you're hitting whoops, bumps, and jumps like an Ultra 4 racer, it won't matter.



I haven't been in both to really feel the difference but on small stuff and around town it shouldn't be that noticeable. From what I have read about the two, it has more to do with hitting the real big stuff like whoops, bumps and jumps. Progressive will get stiffer throughout and help keep you from bottoming out as easy where as digressive would soften up on those big impacts. I would say if you plan to hit big stuff often, get progressive shocks. If big stuff isn't something your truck will see much of, get digressive.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Regardless of these being digressive or progressive, are they valved for a 4Runner...?

I'm thinking that's less than likely by the need to "ream" the lower mounting hole and purchase a top plate.

Or will you be re-valving them when you take them apart to replace that hose fitting?

Sure an Icon setup is spendy, but once you buy the reservoir mounts, the top plate, springs and the right hose fitting you're looking at another ~$400 (depending on the prices you're able to find.

Then, for the average user (I don't know if you're doing it yourself or not) you're looking at at least another couple hundred dollars to have these brand new units completely disassembled in order to have the new hose fittings installed, the mis-matched springs installed, and the lower mount "reamed" to fit.

For the average user, that's a good bit of down time, the hassle of finding a shop that will do the work (and do it correctly) and the cost of time and fuel to drop them off and pick them up.

So if you paid $360 (which the average user will not be paying- they're "on sale" for $483.55 each at DSM right now) you're looking at (if you do the work) an extra ~$400 and hours of labor to get something working for your vehicle.

If you don't do the work you're looking at at least an extra $600.

If you buy them at retail you'll be over the cost of an Icon, King, or Fox setup by the time you have them ready to run. In fact, if you ordered through a place like Total Automotive you'd likely be able to purchase an Icon setup with remote reservoirs and the CDC valving.

And they would come assembled, ready to run, to your door.
 
It's true that I have been unable to tell (feel) the difference between two VERY similar 3rd gen 4Runners, one with Kings, one with Icons. Around town the ride is pretty rough, and on the same stretches of washboarded out, rough dirt roads, they feel the same to me- getting smoother the faster you go, and the faster the piston gets pumping.

Even riding in a long travel 2nd gen Tacoma with King coilovers and shocks I truly felt no difference on the same crappy road. Around town it felt a bit nicer (see also: softer) but once we were bombing down the road over the washboards it felt arguably the same to me. So similar, in fact, that any plans for long travel (for me) went out the door.

I'm of the opinion that unless you're hitting whoops, bumps, and jumps like an Ultra 4 racer, it won't matter.

if you valve them to softer setting will it be better in town, the icons
 
They are! I've been driving for about a month! Dec. 23-2.jpg
[MENTION=92536]choff1212[/MENTION]
 

Attachments

  • Dec. 23-2.jpg
    Dec. 23-2.jpg
    26.9 KB · Views: 892
Looking real good, that reservoir is a beast! I'm thinking doing a similar setup pretty soon. Was the picture taken at full droop without limit straps?

Yes that was full droop no straps... YET. Anyone know if these have been run on a 4Runner ever before?
 
I haven't seen anyone run 8" shocks on stock suspension. You may be the first. Also I'd like to see full compression if possible.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Tomorrow... (or I guess later today) I will test out a bit of the full compression of these CO's and see where I am bump-wise! I am still waiting to fork out money to finish the front end off with front bumpstops and limiting straps! So far around town the CO's have been far smoother with small bumps over the previous Toytec Ultimate CO's. Over larger bumps the improvement is even more exaggerated, the rebound is more controlled and the front end of the 4Runner seems to make its way back to ride height without any bouncing whatsoever. In other words, rebound feels DIALED right away, that has been the stand out improvement! Other than that, my springs tend to creak quite a lot more than before. We just had some snow and salt on the roads which can be a factor, but I have washed the rig since then with little improvement. I am also making sure to lubricate the rod ends on the CO frequently along with my UCA's. 126174r.jpg

I got a bit creative over the college break and decided to make a long overdue change ... retrofithalo1.jpg
All done! :dancin:
 

Attachments

  • 126174r.jpg
    126174r.jpg
    74.7 KB · Views: 3,014
  • retrofithalo1.jpg
    retrofithalo1.jpg
    82.6 KB · Views: 1,154
Last edited:
Bump check: Preparing to add bumpstops and straps

Sneak peek of how things went (I will make an official observation post from my computer shortly)
IMG_6372.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6372.jpg
    IMG_6372.jpg
    136.6 KB · Views: 1,184
Bump??

Got to run the 4R through a ditch today... IMG_6359.jpg
Near full bump and still travel left (hard to see) IMG_6358.jpg
IMG_6366.jpg Lots of flex!! IMG_6372.jpg

IMG_6400.jpg About 1 1/4" shock left before extended bumps.

IMG_6380.jpg Droop maxed out! IMG_6364.jpg

Overall very pleased with the front end and rear end equally. I was surprised at the travel amount on the front (useable travel.

Extended bump stops should take care of how close the shock is to maxing out!

I will try to upload a video of the CO's over bumps and the rebound of the 4R.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6400.jpg
    IMG_6400.jpg
    136.1 KB · Views: 1,139
  • IMG_6358.jpg
    IMG_6358.jpg
    138.9 KB · Views: 1,077
  • IMG_6359.jpg
    IMG_6359.jpg
    134.1 KB · Views: 1,142
  • IMG_6362.jpg
    IMG_6362.jpg
    135.6 KB · Views: 1,244
  • IMG_6364.jpg
    IMG_6364.jpg
    133.3 KB · Views: 1,499
  • IMG_6380.jpg
    IMG_6380.jpg
    138.3 KB · Views: 1,197
  • IMG_6366.jpg
    IMG_6366.jpg
    136.7 KB · Views: 1,179
  • IMG_6372.jpg
    IMG_6372.jpg
    136.6 KB · Views: 1,035

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,316
Messages
3,554,121
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top