Yassss! I'm totally in for a BMW/3rd gen thread!
That being said, I have a 2000 Limited that I also want to manual swap. I feel, though, that the auto is easier off road.
If I manual swap it, I kinda want to V8 swap it at the same time, and keep the multimode 4wd.
Yes, an auto is probably easier in all situations, just push the pedal and go.
My BMW and Yotas include...
-Me: E39 M5 Dinan S2 and a 3rd Gen 4R
-Wife: E92 335i, a 100 Series Cruiser and a 3rd Gen Taco (and a pre-BMW 1971 Mini coming over from England
In for the BMW/3rd gen thread as well. Looks like there are a few of us.
I only compared because I had to drive both down I-405 in stop and go traffic. The short throw of the BMW shifter with the ZHP/M3 weighted knob is pleasurable and the light clutch didn’t irk me in traffic.
I wanted to keep the miles off the BMW and the 3rd gen manual T4R wasn’t as pleasant to drive in traffic, and I wanted full time AWD and better fuel economy so I bought a Subaru Outback 3.0R. Bad decision - I should have grabbed a ‘99-00 Limited instead. That Subaru’s real world city fuel economy is 15.5 mpg on premium fuel (Subaru claims 18) and its radiator is undersized for the 6 cylinder leading to cooling issues when driving over mountain passes in the summer.
And I didn’t realize how much I’d miss the toughness of a BOF truck.
Real world Subaru gas mileage stinks. I've never understood how Subarus have the green crowd endorsement. My 80s Civic hatch got over 40 mpg when empty and I could fit 4 people (no luggage, helmets only) and 4 MTBs on top (barely).
Although all of my current cars get bad gas mileage (my E150 motovan giving the 100-Series a challenge for worst, but also hauling 7-8 people), most of them are better than Subarus. I'd rather have a small diesel car than a Subaru - those truly get good MPG.