Source?
I have provided links to government websites that provide statistics and facts.
Again, "When it comes to violence, nearly every figure suggests that increased presence of guns correlates with higher levels of injury and death"
"Within the US, areas with high gun ownership have higher rates of these problems."
"Still, in cases where a homicide occurs in a home, the presence of a gun there is correlated with increased risk, even after controlling for things like drug use and previous arrests."
Isn't this just logical? If someone pulls a gun on me, and I then pull my own gun, the odds of someone getting shot in this situation have NOT GONE DOWN. To think so is insane.
"Regular citizens with guns, who are sometimes tired, angry, drunk, or afraid, and who are not trained in dispute resolution, have lots of opportunities for inappropriate gun use,"
The problem with that analogy is that it is the next door neighbor who is committing all the violent gun related crimes. US gun crime rates are way higher.
A better analogy would be the guy who's neighbor believes every member of his household should be armed, but can't figure out why his kids keep getting shot.
This is bananas. Did all of you even read the article?