New NY gun law

Nothing qualifies me for an opinion, but if you must ask, my response would be that i have seen way too much violent crime in my life. I as well see no reason for the general public to possess full auto assault weapons. Wouldn't it much nicer if the Mexican drug Cartels shot everyone with paint ball guns ?
It is also interesting that most violent crimes in the same category as the the one at hand, are always committed by white, middle class, or upper middle class people that are actually intelligent, or above average IQ'S.
Sure going out and blowing crap to hell with a full auto weapon is fun, but that does not mean that any num nuts should be able to go purchase one. I get the 2nd amendment blah blah blah, bottom line, these weapons are built to kill and that is it, want to play with one, join the service or become a LEO.

I am so sick of this nonsense! Most violent crime is not committed by law abiding citizens. It is unfortunate, that a very small minority of "unstable" individuals happen to have access to these weapons and commit horrific crimes, but you can't really believe that most violent crime in this category is committed by "white middle class, or upperclass people". Wake up! There is so much of this going on in our inner cities (mostly perpetrated by gangs) that never makes the news because it happens so often. Just look at Chicago or other major metropolis'.
 
Originally Posted by blue dog
Nothing qualifies me for an opinion, but if you must ask, my response would be that i have seen way too much violent crime in my life. I as well see no reason for the general public to possess full auto assault weapons. Wouldn't it much nicer if the Mexican drug Cartels shot everyone with paint ball guns ?
It is also interesting that most violent crimes in the same category as the the one at hand, are always committed by white, middle class, or upper middle class people that are actually intelligent, or above average IQ'S.
Sure going out and blowing crap to hell with a full auto weapon is fun, but that does not mean that any num nuts should be able to go purchase one. I get the 2nd amendment blah blah blah, bottom line, these weapons are built to kill and that is it, want to play with one, join the service or become a LEO.


I am so sick of this nonsense! Most violent crime is not committed by law abiding citizens. It is unfortunate, that a very small minority of "unstable" individuals happen to have access to these weapons and commit horrific crimes, but you can't really believe that most violent crime in this category is committed by "white middle class, or upperclass people". Wake up! There is so much of this going on in our inner cities (mostly perpetrated by gangs) that never makes the news because it happens so often. Just look at Chicago or other major metropolis'.

I forgot to mention....as you may already know, it is almost impossible to purchase and use a "full auto" weapon in this country without extensive background checks and huge licensing fees.. Furthermore, if you look at the statistics, "legal" owners of "full auto" weapons DO NOT have a history of committing horrific crimes!
 
bonnie and clyde.....that's why the ban in 1938 came down in the first place (among others)...:dance:


haha....but we're not seriously talking about changing those laws are we? i personally think there's nothing wrong with the class III structure as it stands....

Funny. But I meant after that of course. Someone else brought it up and I thought I would comment on it lol.
 
So many things I want to say....I'll go with this:

Please (please please please please) educate yourself on your evidence before you use it. It's just like firearms - safety first.

how about we just mention that happened during the last assault weapons ban (modified or not) and it changed nothing and just leave it at that....

north hollywood
February 28, 1997

AWB
September 13, 1994, - September 13, 2004,
 
Yeah, that is exactly what i said. Don't be a d#$%^&s, it is not becoming of you. Yet typical.
As of right now, you are one of those people i would classify a SHOULD NOT OWN a weapon. All it takes is one outburst of stupidity on your part to be lumped in the category. People like you are more detrimental to the pro gun lobby, and you do not even understand why.
Have you ever seen in person someone who was shot in the face ?
Have you ever been next to someone that was gut shot so bad that the the outcome was nothing more then death, as you watched ? Have you been in an active war ? Have you ever been shot at ? Or shot at someone due to being in fear of your life ? Until you have been in a life or death situation, i could care less what kinda super pro gun, my rights are being violated BS you put forth. But to try to spin my words to further your absurd agenda, just hurts your cause even more. I guarantee that i have far more firearm experience and training then you do or probably most here, and i say it again, the general public does not need FULL AUTO assault weapons.

This has got to be one of the most ridiculous statements that I've read (today). So because you *think* you have more firearms training than everyone else, you know what is best for the rest of us? Nevermind your absurd assumption that you are somehow a "tactical god", but the mere fact that you use that ludicrous statement to backup your belief that you know what's better for the rest of us makes me question your ability to own a firearm. If this is how you form opinions, I'd hate to see how you make decisions when decisions count. You passing judgment on someone else in a discussion about Rights disgusts me. Saying someone does not have the capacity to own firearms because they disagree with you is a sign of weakness and embarrassing (for you). In fact, by your posts, I'm not even sure you know the difference between a semi-auto AR15 and an "assault weapon".

Getting shot in the gut? Shot in the face? Active war? WTF does that have to do with ANYTHING? If you have to cite this BS to give yourself a position of authority, then you lost before the conversation started. Most people who have seen this crap don't use it as a badge of honor or a resume piece for use on an internet forum.

And FYI - some of us did time with Uncle Sam and played (are playing) Marine/Soldier in some shitty places.

Oh, and if you're actually a LEO, then you are reeeeeeeeeeally stretching your credentials and experience. In fact, if you are actually a LEO, I'd say "stay in your lane". You are not = to vets with multiple tours in either training or fracked-up experiences regardless of what your 511 pants and tactical vest tells you.

Bottom line - the your experiences have absolutely NOTHING to do with the value of your argument. Oh, and while full-auto is awesome, it is irrelevant to this thread.
 
Last edited:
90% of the content is irrelevant to this thread. I asked for it to be locked since it's going nowhere, but no luck.

haha, you're kidding right, the admins and crew love this sort of thing, flailing retards fighting on the internet is amusing, but hey you gotta feed 'em every now and again, eh?:tongue1: a few pages there were pure gold!
 
I am so sick of this nonsense! Most violent crime is not committed by law abiding citizens. It is unfortunate, that a very small minority of "unstable" individuals happen to have access to these weapons and commit horrific crimes, but you can't really believe that most violent crime in this category is committed by "white middle class, or upperclass people". Wake up! There is so much of this going on in our inner cities (mostly perpetrated by gangs) that never makes the news because it happens so often. Just look at Chicago or other major metropolis'.

What i said was that crimes like the crime at hand are always committed by white middle class intelligent people, not all violent crime.
 
This has got to be one of the most ridiculous statements that I've read (today). So because you *think* you have more firearms training than everyone else, you know what is best for the rest of us?

Again, not choosing for you, just giving my opinion on the matter of owning FULL AUTO WEAPONS.

Nevermind your absurd assumption that you are somehow a "tactical god",

Again, learn to interpret what has been said, instead of stretching things to further your agenda.


but the mere fact that you use that ludicrous statement to backup your belief that you know what's better for the rest of us makes me question your ability to own a firearm. If this is how you form opinions, I'd hate to see how you make decisions when decisions count. You passing judgment on someone else in a discussion about Rights disgusts me.

Again, i simply gave my opinion, yet fanatics like yourself, flip out.


Saying someone does not have the capacity to own firearms because they disagree with you is a sign of weakness and embarrassing (for you). In fact, by your posts, I'm not even sure you know the difference between a semi-auto AR15 and an "assault weapon".

I am really only familiar with the Daisy Red ryder.

Getting shot in the gut? Shot in the face? Active war? WTF does that have to do with ANYTHING? If you have to cite this BS to give yourself a position of authority, then you lost before the conversation started. Most people who have seen this crap don't use it as a badge of honor or a resume piece for use on an internet forum.


Umm ok, learn to interpret what you read.

And FYI - some of us did time with Uncle Sam and played (are playing) Marine/Soldier in some shitty places
Oh, and if you're actually a LEO, then you are reeeeeeeeeeally stretching your credentials and experience. In fact, if you are actually a LEO, I'd say "stay in your lane". You are not = to vets with multiple tours in either training or fracked-up experiences regardless of what your 511 pants and tactical vest
Bottom line - the your experiences have absolutely NOTHING to do with the value of your argument. Oh, and while full-auto is awesome, it is irrelevant to this thread.


Who i am and what i do, you will never know. I have accomplished my mission here , hook line and sinker, sucked in the fanatics,and got them all in a huff. You showed yourself and your true colors by your rant.
By the way, your an idiot, and in no way should even own a sling shot.
Well, i am going to continue to kick puppies now, have a great night.
 
Who i am and what i do, you will never know. I have accomplished my mission here , hook line and sinker, sucked in the fanatics,and got them all in a huff. You showed yourself and your true colors by your rant.
By the way, your an idiot, and in no way should even own a sling shot.
Well, i am going to continue to kick puppies now, have a great night.

Lol...."mission".

My interpretation is no better than your ability to put thoughts to words.

OK, warrior, why don't you break it down barney style for me?
 
Last edited:
it is pretty disappointing. I enjoy a good debate, but most of this is just High School bickering. Insult each other, take shots then try to get in the last word. This is why I suggested it be closed. Of course, I couldn't mention that without invoking a typical "anti-moderator" comment from someone :/
 
Who i am and what i do, you will never know. I have accomplished my mission here , hook line and sinker, sucked in the fanatics,and got them all in a huff. You showed yourself and your true colors by your rant.
By the way, your an idiot, and in no way should even own a sling shot.
Well, i am going to continue to kick puppies now, have a great night.

Nobody who has the super-secret skills you are trying desperately to imply, would ever mention them on a forum like this.

By the way: You're, the contraction of you are.
 
What i said was that crimes like the crime at hand are always committed by white middle class intelligent people, not all violent crime.

Sorry, but I really do not believe there is a correlation between a person's race or intelligence as the significant factor for which these crimes are committed. I would try staying away from using words like "always".

- Ft Hood massacre (classified as a random act of workplace violence, not terrorism).
- DC sniper shootings

Both were not committed by "white middle class intelligent people".
 
Oh-boy-here-we-go.jpg

Conn. Senators to Unveil Assault Weapons Ban Legislation | NBC Connecticut

Feinstein revives assault-weapons ban

Majority Leader Harry Reid has said such a ban might clear the Senate but doubts it could pass the House of Representatives.

Who i am and what i do, you will never know. I have accomplished my mission here , hook line and sinker, sucked in the fanatics,and got them all in a huff. You showed yourself and your true colors by your rant.
By the way, your an idiot, and in no way should even own a sling shot.
Well, i am going to continue to kick puppies now, have a great night.

wow...mall security maybe? do you really think you trolled us ? like you jumped in at the very end of the thread to throw your two worthless cents in and some how managed to troll the entire thread? heck if anyone should claim troll rights it's either me or doc, haha, depends on how you look at it, either way you sure do think alot of yourself, at least i know i'm a moron....:wave:
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,316
Messages
3,554,120
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top