NO MORE PICS in signature!

Thai said:
I would assume that you guys just post a thread...and then ask no one else to post in it?? I don't know how to JUST ALLOW one person to post while limiting everyone else.

They just put a warning in the thread, such as a sticky, that warns everyone that any post done by anyone other than the OP will be deleted.

It would be up to the mods, since they will have to enforce yet another rule.
 
HB 4X4 said:
They just put a warning in the thread, such as a sticky, that warns everyone that any post done by anyone other than the OP will be deleted.

It would be up to the mods, since they will have to enforce yet another rule.
That's not going to happen, because that means the Mods will have more to do.

People need to do what you do, create a Thread and link that bad boy over into the signature.
 
Fo_SheeZy said:
Yup, this forum is more like yotatech now....
not even close, theres no lieing and backstabbing here, this place is SOOOOO much better :bigok: maybe thats why Im here everyday, lol
 
ric said:
not even close, theres no lieing and backstabbing here, this place is SOOOOO much better :bigok: maybe thats why Im here everyday, lol
Well only related to yotatech as in no sigs, but yeah your right. Everyone here is 10,000x more friendlier than over there!
 
Fo_SheeZy said:
Well only related to yotatech as in no sigs, but yeah your right. Everyone here is 10,000x more friendlier than over there!

ohh ok, then YES, makes more sense now lol :D
 
sn0wrunner said:
... I think toto has a great idea. Some sort of section ...

There's already a modding sticky at the top of the General Discussion section where you can put your links.
 
Due to complaints already, there will not be any exception to the rule of no pics in signature.

Again, sorry about this...hopefully, we can get this all square away when we get the software update.
 
I hate the lack of photos for those that were into it and could keep their image sizes down to reason - but I applaud it for those few cases where someone didn't understand that a 4096x2048 image was simply too much but posted it in their sig anyway. When one has a 22" widescreen monitor, and views a forum in a maximized browser window and STILL has to scroll left to right to read posts because 1 sig in the thread had a massive image in it, something was wrong. Didn't they also get some photo editing (aka resizing) software with those digital cameras? lol :)
 
SubSonic said:
I hate the lack of photos for those that were into it and could keep their image sizes down to reason - but I applaud it for those few cases where someone didn't understand that a 4096x2048 image was simply too much but posted it in their sig anyway. When one has a 22" widescreen monitor, and views a forum in a maximized browser window and STILL has to scroll left to right to read posts because 1 sig in the thread had a massive image in it, something was wrong. Didn't they also get some photo editing (aka resizing) software with those digital cameras? lol :)

That why I had mine no more than 400pixels wide.
 
mine was on the small side as well, i don't remember the exact width, but should have been no problem for even someone w/ an old 15" CRT. Sucks that its easier to change the rules to the most extreme possibility, than to just enforce the rules that most were trying to follow.
 
Thai said:
Due to complaints already, there will not be any exception to the rule of no pics in signature.

Again, sorry about this...hopefully, we can get this all square away when we get the software update.
It's sad that people have nothing better to due than complain and *****...
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,316
Messages
3,554,120
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top