OME 880 vs 881 paired with 906?

[bpowa]

Well, I currently have stock springs with 906 rears. I like the lift level with the bilsteins.

I was waiting to see if I could find used trd tundra coils but to no avail, and I dont want to pay 280 for a set of springs.

The truck rides fine except for 1 complaint. I get a nose dive when I brake.

I dont have any load so id like to know if anyone paired 881 with 906 and how does it sit with no trim packers? before and after sag?

 

[MTD]

Well, I currently have stock springs with 906 rears. I like the lift level with the bilsteins.

I was waiting to see if I could find used trd tundra coils but to no avail, and I dont want to pay 280 for a set of springs.

The truck rides fine except for 1 complaint. I get a nose dive when I brake.

I dont have any load so id like to know if anyone paired 881 with 906 and how does it sit with no trim packers? before and after sag?

My 880 and 906 setup sat perfectly level, 881's will give you negative rake because they lift stock 4runners 2.5 inches.

 

[bpowa]

My 880 and 906 setup sat perfectly level, 881's will give you negative rake because they lift stock 4runners 2.5 inches.

See. This is what I don't understand. I read others have a level stance with 881' also.. Others say 880 have a rake.

 

[kernel.panik]

According to Wheelers Off Road, the 880s are 365mm free height and the 881s are 375. Both have a 500lb rating, so the 881 should be taller.

I think a lot will depend on if your 906s have settled. I would imagine that newly installed 906s would sit more level with 881s and settled 906 would maybe match 880s.

 

[jluu6r]

I just had new 881/906 springs installed and the front is a 1/2 inch lower than the back.

 

[MTD]

I just had new 881/906 springs installed and the front is a 1/2 inch lower than the back.

I would like to point out that my 906/880's were both used with 5k on them. I'm going to guess that they will sag and your front will be higher than the rear.