Previous generation 4Runner was better

I ran 13.4-5s stock and 13.3 with just a JoeZ intake tube (drop-in filter) and a cat back. When stock I have beaten stock Gs everytime (at least a dozen times). The only stock car in my class that was right there was the 335i.

Koz

Wow, congrats. Even if in 2008 the IS350 was offered with AWD (it wasn't), it was/is too small a car for me at 6'3" with 2 kids. With a manual boost controller, exhaust and a true drop in K+N my Laser went [email protected]. Not bad for a 15.0@93 stock car ;)
 
This is funny. Neither of you have 4Runners and yet you are posting here arguing about some little car. Do they not have a forum or something?

Even though I do not own a 4Runner anymore I'm probably the biggest 4Runner/Toyota loyalist on this site!

Koz
 
Funny, 4th gen owners whine in a 5th gen forum.

Whoa!! Don't throw us (4th geners) in the same basket. I love my 4th gen, but I really like the 5th gen. I don't think the last version was better. Its just different. When the 4th gen came out, I hated it (I had a 3rd gen at the time). I eventually warmed up to it. When the 5th gen came out, I hated it. Now, I really like it. Most likely my next truck. Both trucks have different missions. The 4th catered to the more "main stream" buyer. The 5th doesn't. At the end of the day, they are bulletproof trucks that do their mission extremely well. Everything else is BS (subjective)
 
cuz,
well that makes everything ok then

ps my wife's 2012 5.0 mustang that is way faster that your little thingy thing. In fact it can b!tch-slap that BMW 335 into the cheap seats.
 
cuz,
well that makes everything ok then

ps my wife's 2012 5.0 mustang that is way faster that your little thingy thing. In fact it can b!tch-slap that BMW 335 into the cheap seats.

The Mustang GT needed 420hp to be able to finally beat the IS. I've embarrassed many of the previous V8 Mustangs! You may want to be very carful lining up against a slightly modded 335, it could be a very humbling experience.

Koz
 
The Mustang GT needed 420hp to be able to finally beat the IS. I've embarrassed many of the previous V8 Mustangs! You may want to be very carful lining up against a slightly modded 335, it could be a very humbling experience.

Koz

I call BS on you ... you ain't beat no 5.0 with that kitten, the new M3 can almost hang with it, but a 335 is not even close. I did learn that a white supra with 2 asian guys in it near Houston that is damn fast.
 
Last edited:
Is there a "This thread is stupid" button?

Cause I wanna push it. No offense meant... but I REALLY wanna push it.
 
I call BS on you ... you ain't beat no 5.0 with that kitten, the new M3 can almost hang with it, but a 335 is not even close. I did learn that a white supra with 2 asian guys in it near Houston that is damn fast.

Apparently you don't line up very much. Until Ford put over 400 hp in the GT (which they came late to the party) that little kitten was quicker. The M3 can almost hang, now that's funny. How quick do you think the new stock GT is, or how quick have you gone?

Koz
 
Since we are so far off subject anyways . Did anybody see the Lexus LFA on Top Gear last night on the History Channel.Great show! It did get spanked by Tanner's 600+ HP Ford Fiesta that pulls 0-60 in 2.2 seconds.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/A5R-oi91bd4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
The Mustang GT needed 420hp to be able to finally beat the IS. I've embarrassed many of the previous V8 Mustangs! You may want to be very carful lining up against a slightly modded 335, it could be a very humbling experience.

Koz

I own a "slightly modded" 335i (in my garage), and its a its about a 12.7-9ish car, but you guys are talking two totally different cars. Mine is a 4 door touring car and a mustang is an american muscle car.

The mustang might beat it in a 1/4 mile race, but in the real world of driving on the street its not even close to being a "drivers" car. Its rough all over and unrefined (as are all muscle cars) and I think would be miserable to drive more than 2 hours at a time. They list it as a lower 12 sec car but 95% of owners can even drive them into the 13's. I would venture to say that most people with a car capable of sub 12 sec can't drive it to that point, its more that just mashing down the gas when the car gets 2' sideways at 80 mph. I have buddies that have 8-9 sec big block turbo mustangs and they are fast - if they are running, but miserable to be in for more than a night cruise.

BUT Don't get me wrong if i was looking for a american muscle car i would get one, they are great for what they were built for. As a touring car not so much.

As for the IS350 - great car and a good comparison to the 335i. Probably a little more dependable than the 335i, but its still drives very "toyota ish" - which isn't a bad thing, its just the truth. The 335i is still more of a drivers car. All that being said when I get a new 4 door sports touring car it will be the IS350 or whatever is out in 2015.


To tie it back to 4Runners its like comparing a 4Runner to a Jeep Unlimited - the Jeep is great at one thing - off road, take that bugger on a long trip and its not so much fun, wobbles, tracks terrible, poor drivers vehicle, etc.
 
Last edited:
you seen these test?

2011 Ford Mustang GT Premium First Test - Motor Trend

2011 BMW M3 Coupe vs. 2011 Ford Mustang GT Comparison - Motor Trend

2011 Ford Mustang GT vs 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS vs 2010 Dodge Challenger SRT8 Comparison - Motor Trend

her last one was a 06 GT with 3.55, it was pretty fast, but
this one is 3.73 + brembo (bone stock) and just stupid fun

gt2.jpg
 

Attachments

  • gt2.jpg
    gt2.jpg
    42.2 KB · Views: 526
Since we are so far off subject anyways . Did anybody see the Lexus LFA on Top Gear last night on the History Channel.Great show! It did get spanked by Tanner's 600+ HP Ford Fiesta that pulls 0-60 in 2.2 seconds.


that is a badass car!
 
Last edited:

Weird -I've never seen this and the verdict is almost the exact same as what I said.

""Randy's response? "God bless America! Let's hear it for the Mustang. To me, that is a giant win for the Mustang GT because the BMW is such formidable competition."
What about us? Do we take Randy's advice and name the Mustang, even in defeat, the winner? No. Although it may test better, cost less, and lap faster in the hands of (an exceptionally) common man, on this day, the Mustang is beaten fair and square where it matters most. But that's not the reason we are loath to call the Mustang America's M3.

A Mustang is a Mustang. Always has been, always will be, no matter how close it comes to knocking off one of the world's finest sports cars. Even if it had fully scalped the Bavarian, that wouldn't change the fundamental ethos of a legend 46 years in the making: fast, fun, and within reach of everyman. It's not America's M3. It's America's Mustang.""


Yes the Mustang is a great American Muscle Car, but they are totally different machines. Also I have owned a sub 12 sec 1987 fox body coupe, fun but different still.
 
Last edited:
Weird -I've never seen this and the verdict is almost the exact same as what I said.

Yep I have read them too, check out the data and charts, pretty damn close across the board. The 2 M3 that I've data on were almost as fast but I pulled them both (me alone+ 1/2 tank 93), the next one may be faster.

For $32K/OTD it will sure puts a big fat smile on your face.
 
Last edited:
Weird -I've never seen this and the verdict is almost the exact same as what I said.

Yep I have read them too, check out the data and charts, pretty damn close across the board. The 2 M3 that I've data on were almost as fast but I pulled them both (me alone+ 1/2 tank 93), the next one may be faster.

For $32K/OTD it will sure puts a big fat smile on your face.

As Motor Trend and I have now both said - a drivers car is not all about speed or track times.

PS: we got to teach you how to quote things properly. Leave the {/QUOTE} at the end or else its all screwed up. You've done it twice in a row.

BACK TO COMPLAINING ABOUT THESE JUNKY 5TH GENS!
 
Last edited:

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,309
Messages
3,554,070
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top