Rented an SR5... wow!

JayceeP

New member
So I'll try and keep this brief but I recently travelled to California/Vegas for a 12 day celebratory trip.

We arrived into LAX and took the shuttle over to Alamo where I somehow booked a 12-day "standard" SUV for only $305US (Hyundai Santa Fe or similar). Crazy deal because the rates were usually about $550US for most major car rental companies. I feel like it was a glitch. Anyway...

So, we get to Alamo. Already checked-in online so the rep directs us to the "SUV" line where in expecting to see Santa Fe's, perhaps a Grand Cherokee, Explorer etc. As we were walking I noticed a Black SR5 sitting by some other big SUVs like Tahoes, Suburban's etc. Anyway, we get to the "SUV" line and see a guy occupying a Black Santa Fe that looked decent and I then look in horror as all that remains is a Nissan Rogue, Jeep Compass, and a few other non-SUV vehicles. I immediately walk over to the rep and basically say, these are not the vehicles I was expecting. Without hesitation the rep says, "We've got a black 4Runner.." and before I let him continue any further I say "I'll take it!!!!!!!"

So, all I really wanted to say is how impressed I was with the new SR5's! Much better than the 2013 I test drove when I bought my LE. Nose dive is minimal at most... brakes are a bit grabby. The handling was very impressive and felt as solid as my LE on the highway and around corners. The headroom was awesome because there was no sunroof. The factory touchscreen and sound system were adequate and much better than the 2013 I test drove. I also noticed the 2015 SR5 felt lighter overall and the rear lift gate was also much lighter. Not sure if more lightweight parts are being used.... I doubt the 20" LE wheels make the vehicle feel that much heavier though I suppose the full-time 4wd contributes to the extra weight too.

Fuel economy: noticeably better than my LE and very good overall. Booted it up to San Francisco immediately after leaving LAX and I got just under 21mpg according to the computer despite doing nearly 80mph the whole way (traffic was moving fast) and despite a nearly 1-hour delay in a construction zone on I5. I wish my LE performed this well on the highway. I rarely get better than 18mpg on the highway which is annoying.

In general the refreshed styling, updated gauge clusters etc make the SR5 seem like a reasonable entry level 4Runner and it is definitely an improvement over the pre 2014 models.

Overall, if the refreshed SR5 was available at the time of purchase, I would strongly consider saving close to $10k and going with it over the LE. Some nicer wheels and running boards are all that's missing.

Just thought I'd pass along my comments/experience. I have NOT driven a refreshed LE so I can't compare it.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Damn you!! Just when I was wondering if it was time to trade ...

Here we go again.


Eye-roll-liz-lemon.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Eye-roll-liz-lemon.jpg
    Eye-roll-liz-lemon.jpg
    15.6 KB · Views: 1,299
Damn you!! Just when I was wondering if it was time to trade ...
You'll definitely notice and feel the improvement. Getting close to the new gen though!

Wifey needs a new vehicle. I'm really unsure what to buy and I've become a big believer in Japanese made. Might consider a used GS but I could definitely add another 4Runner and just get a new SR5 and give the wife the LE. If I'm gonna drop $40k... I'd rather have new and used US vehicles are completely not an option with our dollar now. Anyway, you should test one out!
 
Don't think anything besides cosmetic things were really improved upon in '14 when they refreshed them... But glad you liked it. :)
 
Don't think anything besides cosmetic things were really improved upon in '14 when they refreshed them... But glad you liked it. :)
That's correct. Not sure why it felt so much better than the 2013. I also checked and the curb weight for the 2013 and 2015 SR5 is the same... but Toyota also claims all trims and drive lines achieve the same fuel economy and that's certainly not true... at least on the highway.
 
You're comparing a full time 4WD against an RWD.

There's no difference between the refreshed models, unless you get your mitts on the PRO which has a better stock suspension.

I rented a new SR5 in Denver and it was identical to my pre-refresh TE before I lifted it (except in the corners where KDSS kills everything else).
 
You're comparing a full time 4WD against an RWD.

There's no difference between the refreshed models, unless you get your mitts on the PRO which has a better stock suspension.

I rented a new SR5 in Denver and it was identical to my pre-refresh TE before I lifted it (except in the corners where KDSS kills everything else).
I know mechanically there is no difference. All I really said was the refreshed SR5 is way more appealing. Having standard touchscreen/back-up cam, better guages, definitely make a difference. Other gadgetry like the display in the guage cluster showing mpg, digital speed, range etc is nice. It does feel lighter because it is (vs LE), but the tailgate is definitely lighter for some reason... or the arms/shocks have been changed. The nose-dive issue has also been addressed. Also, full-time 4wd definitely has worse fuel economy despite Toyota and fueleconomy.gov. I will admit, my biggest positive is the fuel economy difference vs the LE.
 
Last edited:
I can't speak to the difference between years but we were considering either a Grand Cherokee or a 4Runner and after driving both, the 4Runner blew the Grand Cherokee out of the water. Head and shoulders above
 
I can't speak to the difference between years but we were considering either a Grand Cherokee or a 4Runner and after driving both, the 4Runner blew the Grand Cherokee out of the water. Head and shoulders above

Hey, you just don't understand Jeep (TM) Quality.

If it doesn't catch fire or a wheel doesn't fall off, you're already golden.
 
I also forgot to add it was super comforting knowing we had a 4Runner for our journey through the Mojave as night was approaching and other rural areas of coastal California. Very reassuring :).
 
Hey, you just don't understand Jeep (TM) Quality.

If it doesn't catch fire or a wheel doesn't fall off, you're already golden.

This does not apply to Wranglers though. I have a TJ and that thing is insanely capable and reliable. Only problem with it is the storage space is non-existant
 
This does not apply to Wranglers though. I have a TJ and that thing is insanely capable and reliable. Only problem with it is the storage space is non-existant

Actually I think it does apply to Wranglers. It is insanely capable, not sure about the reliability part. I've heard enough to suggest otherwise.
 
Jayceep you are imagining things nothing has changed in the suspension to reduce nose dive or handling
Well I never said the suspension was changed. However, I did read the brake lines were changed so perhaps it's related to that. I found the nose dive is definitely not like it was on the 2013. With respect to handling, all I meant is I was rather impressed how it handles relative to the LE. I clocked 1,500 miles over 12 days so I had much more opportunity to have a fair comparison as opposed to a test-drive from the dealer. I drove all over California, thru the desert to Vegas, thru mountain passes, LA traffic, the coastal highway 1 from San Fran to Cambria etc. No test-drive can match that :D.

Yours is the 3rd post telling me that there were no major mechanical changes and I know that. My post might be a bit confusing because it wasn't supposed to be just a comparison between the pre-refreshed and refreshed SR5 but also between the refreshed SR5 and the LE that I own.
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
278,312
Messages
3,554,083
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top